Mumbai Goa Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajendra Kumar S/O. Shrem Kumar Vs. the State of Goa
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
By this appeal, the appellant (hereinafter, referred to as the accused) takes exception to the judgment and order dated 22nd December, 2008, passed by the Special Judge, at Mapusa in Special Criminal Case No. 1/2008, convicting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the Act for short) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) and in default, to undergo further imprisonment for one year. The accused has been granted set off in respect of the period of detention in terms of Section 428 Cr.P.C. 2. The appellant was accused No.2 in Special Criminal Case No. 1/2008 filed against two accused pursuant to a raid conducted by PW.7 Punaji Gawas, attached to the ANC Police Station, Panaji on the basis of a specific and reliable information received on 23.10.2007 that one lady and one man would be coming near Dipti's Bar and Restau...
Suresh Baban Kakodkar and Another Vs. State of Goa and Others
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Dec-06-2012
Oral Judgment: (U.V. Bakre, J.) Heard Mr. Usgaonkar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mrs. S. Mordekar, learned Additional Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 3. None present on behalf of the respondent No.2. 2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs: (a) That this Hon'ble court be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction or order commanding the Respondents no.1 to 3 to grant permission for construction of Residential Building and compound wall in plots 6-B and of 7-B of survey No.143/1 (part) of Cacora Village, Quepem Taluka as per the lay out plan approved by Town and Country Planning Department Quepem vide their letter No.TPQ/CT Q-CCR 143/05/237, dated 30/03/2005, (b) Further any other writ, direction, order setting aside the impugned letter of the Respondent no.2 dated 21.6....
Dr. Prakash Mutagi, Asst. Professor of Goa Engineering College Vs. Sta ...
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Dec-06-2012
Oral Judgment: (A.P. Lavande, J.) Heard Mr. Pangam, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Mahambrey, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3 and Mr. Ferreira, learned Assistant Solicitor General for respondent no.4. None appears on behalf of respondent no.5. 2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks direction to respondent no.4 to issue ex-post facto concurrence to his tour to France in order to facilitate the clearance of TA/DA final bill and direction to respondents no.1 to 3 to release and pay to him his salary for the month of December, 2006 and to pay all his consequential dues to which he is entitled in view of voluntary retirement. 3. The case of the petitioner is as follows:- In the year 2003, the petitioner was serving as Assistant Professor in Goa Engineering College. All India Council for Technical Education granted approval to the petitioner for attending International Conference at Paris for presentation of paper on a particular subject. An amoun...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›