Mumbai Aurangabad Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shyamal Vs. State of Maharashtra Through The Secretary Women and Child ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
S.S. Shinde, J. 1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking directions to the Respondents to appoint the petitioner as Anganwadi Karyakarti (Sevika), as she is already working as Anganwadi Madatnis in the light of the Government Resolution dated 5th August, 2015. There is a further prayer seeking direction to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to decide the representations dated 13th March, 2013 and 7th March, 2013. It is further prayed that, the respondents be restrained from filling in the post of Anganwadi Karyakarti (Sevika) in Anganwadi No.79 at Pethsangvi, Tq. Omerga, Dist. Osmanabad. By way of amendment on 10th April, 2013, further petitioner has prayed for quashing the selection process initiated by Respondent No.3 for appointment of Anganwadi Sevika (Karyakarti) in Anganwadi No. 79 at Pethsangvi, Tq. Omerga, Dist. Osmanabad, and by way of further amendment on 17th March, 2015, further relief is claimed to quash and set aside the selection process/recruitment process initiated by Respondent No...
Vasant and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-21-2015
1. The first application is filed for relief of quashing of F.I.R. No. 10/2014 which is registered at Loha Police Station, Nanded for the offences punishable under sections 5, 32 (B) and 33 of Bombay Money-Lenders Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) and also for the offence punishable under section 420 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'I.P.C.' for short). The second application is filed by the applicants for permission to produce some documents. Both the sides are heard. 2. Copies of police papers were made available. The other side has filed reply affidavit to oppose the application. In the second application, the applicants have produced copies of some sale deeds executed in favour of applicants by the original complainants, debtors. 3. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by one Assistant Registrar, Officer appointed by the State Government, for implementation of provisions of the Act. The debtors had approached Police S...
Mahadevi Vs. Gopal
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-20-2015
Per Court: 1. This application is filed under Section 24 of the CPC by the applicant/ wife seeking transfer of H.M.P. No. 163 of 2014 pending before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, to the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ambajogai. The respondent is the husband of the applicant. 2. The parties had got married on 11-03-2012 at Saygaon, Tq. Ambajogai. It is alleged that on account of some ill-treatment and in view of the failure on the part of the applicant to fulfill alleged demands by the respondent/ husband, she was driven out of her matrimonial home by the husband and his close relatives. Since then, applicant resides at Sayagaon, Tq. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed. 3. The applicant has filed two proceedings against the respondent/ husband which are pending before the competent Courts at Ambajogai. Misc. Criminal Application No. 62 of 2014 is preferred by the applicant under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and which is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Firs...
M/s. Shivshakti Bioplantic Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anoth ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-20-2015
1. The proceeding is filed for quashing of the FIR No.5/2015 registered in Hadgaon Police Station for offences punishable under section 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by the Agriculture Officer in respect of fertilizers found on the road when sale of the fertilizer was going on. The incident took place on 31-1-2015. Both the sides are heard. 2. The incident took place on Hadgaon Tamsa Road. One truck bearing No. MH 26 AD 669 was stationary on the road and the sale of bags containing fertilizer was going on. Farmers had gathered and coolies were there for carrying the bags. When the officers including the complainant reached there and started making enquiry, persons who had gathered including the coolies went away. 3. On the inquiry made by the Agriculture Officer persons who were with the truck showed bilti of Navbharat Fertilizer. No other record was found with regard to the ...
Krishna Kautik Valvi and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-20-2015
S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, heard finally. 2. The brief facts leading for filing the present Petition, disclosed in the memo of Petition, are as under: (a) By the instant petition the petitioners are seeking directions against the respondent no. 1 to 4 herein to grant the benefits of Career Advancement Scheme to the petitioners by considering the petitioners' earlier services. (b) In the year 1995, by following due process of law, the petitioners have been appointed as lecturers in their respective subjects. The petitioners have been appointed by duly selection committee and the said appointments have been approved by the respondent no.4 University. At the time of appointment of the petitioners, the NET/SET qualification was not essential and the same was made compulsory w.e.f. 04.04.2000. That apart, at the relevant time, the candidates of having NET/SET qualification were not availabl...
Gnyanoba Tejrao Hake Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secreta ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-18-2015
S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith heard with the consent of the parties. 3. This Petition takes an exception to the Judgment and Order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, dated 06.05.2011, in Original Application No.270/2011, and also to the termination order dated 03.02.2004 issued by the respondent No.3 and the impugned communication dated 26.09.2008 issued by the respondent No.1, with further prayer for reinstatement in service with continuity of service from the date of termination and pay petitioner all the consequential benefits as per the seniority. It is also alternatively prayed that, the respondents be directed to act upon the directions issued by the respondent No.1, to the respondent No.3 dated 31.08.2005 and the petitioner be appointed afresh without giving him the benefit of his past service with the respondent No.3. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that, he has passed H.S.C. Examination. The respondent No.3 issued an adve...
Deelip and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through its Chief Secr ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-18-2015
S.S. Shinde, J. Writ Petition No. 514 of 2015 is filed with following prayers: B. The impugned Judgment and Order dtd. 4.9.2009 passed by the Ld. Member of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad Bench Aurangabad in Original Application No. 1024/1999, may kindly be quashed and set aside and all the pensionary benefits may be given to the petitioner, by issuing writ against the respondents no.1 to 5, by treating the period 13.06.1965 to 29.06.1966 as pensionable period by condoning the broken period in service of the petitioner. C. The respondents No.1 to 5 may kindly be directed or ordered to reconsider the pensionary benefits with all the consequential benefits to the petitioner. 2. Writ Petition No. 6146 of 2014 is filed with following prayers: B. The impugned Decision/Order bearing Outward No. Pra.Ka.Na./Ashta/A-3/2013/2789 dated 03.04.2013 passed by the respondent No.3, may kindly be quashed and set aside and the period of petitioner from 13.07.1965 to 29.07.1966 may be tre...
Vyankatesh Shikshan Sanstha Latur Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
Oral Judgment: (S.S. Shinde, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, heard finally. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, he invited our attention to the resolution passed by the petitioner Management, wherein one Shri. Mukta Shivmurti Manmathappa, was appointed as Headmaster. He further submits that, his proposal was sent to the Education Officer for approval by forwarding letter dated 8th November, 2013, addressed to the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad Latur. It is further submitted that, Respondent No.4 voluntarily agreed before the Education Officer to give up his claim for the post of Headmaster by promotion, though he was senior most teacher. The learned counsel invited our attention to the letter written by Shri. Nagade addressed to Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Latur dated 8th November, 2013, and submitted that, the contents of the said letter were written by said Shri. Nagade in presence of Edu...
Sudhir Sambhaji Maldode Vs. South Central Railway and Others
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith heard with the consent of the parties. 3. By way of filing present Petition, the petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents to pay an amount of travelling allowance, conveyance allowance and holiday encashment to the petitioner of the period of 09.02.2010 to 03.02.2013. Brief facts disclosed in the memo of the Petition are as under: 4. It is the case of the petitioner that, the petitioner came to be appointed on 17.04.1984 as a Constable in Railway Protection Force. The petitioner came to be promoted to the post of Head Constable. Petitioner met with an accident and has undergone operation of total hip replacement. The Medical Authority of the respondents declared the petitioner unfit for armed force duty and recommended for alternative employment of sedentary type of job by Certificate dated 06.02.2010. It is the further case of the petitioner that, on 08.02.2010, the petitioner resumed his duty at RPF Outpost,...
Subhaschandra Balchandra Badjate Vs. The Director General, Central Exc ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
1. The petition is filed for relief of declaration that the arrest of the petitioner was illegal, the seizure of amount of Rs. 45 lakh from possession of the petitioner was illegal and the proceeding like adjudication under the Central Excise Act cannot be held against the petitioner. Relief of return of the aforesaid amount seized by the officers of the Central Excise is also claimed. Both the sides are heard. 2. The petitioner is share holder of majority shares of one private company by name M/s Rutuja Ispat Private Limited Company situated at Jalna, Maharashtra". Shri. Shailesh Badjate and Shri. Sushil Badjate, two sons of the present petitioner, are the Directors of the company and on the record they are conducting the business of this company. The petitioner and his two sons are living in the same premises situated in Jalna where the office of the company is also situated. 3. There was specific information to the officers of the Directorate General of Central Excise (Intelligence)...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »