Mumbai Aurangabad Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jeevan S/O Abajirao Ghogre Patil Vs. the Mayor and Others
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: May-11-2012
Oka, J. 1. These two Petitions can be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment and order. In Writ Petition No. 5073 of 2011, this Court passed an order on 14th September 2011 directing that the Petition shall be heard finally at the stage of admission. The issue involved in Writ Petition No.5073 of 2011 is as regards the appointment of the leader of the opposition in the Municipal Corporation of City of Nanded-Waghala. (hereinafter referred to as “the said Corporation”). FACTS IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5073 OF 2011 2. It will be necessary to make reference to the facts of the case in brief. In Writ Petition No. 5073 of 2011, the challenge is to the order dated 7th July 2011 passed by the Mayor of the said Corporation, by which the Mayor purportedly granted approval to the appointment of Respondent No.2 in the said Petition, Shri Mahesh @ Balu Khomane as the leader of the opposition in the said Corporation. 3. The result of the general ward elections of the said Corporation ...
Kiran S/O Narhari Wattamwar and Another Vs. the Collector and Others
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: May-07-2012
1 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. 2 Petitioners in both the petitions are elected councillors of Municipal Council, Loha, District Nanded. Petitioners are declared disqualified to continue as Councillors of the Municipal Council for remainder term by the District Collector, Nanded on 18.02.2012 on consideration of Disqualification Petition No.49/2011 presented by Respondent No.3 - Gajanan Subhashrao Suryawanshi under Section 3(1) (a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 and under Rule 6 of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987. 3 The General Elections to Loha Municipal Council were held in the month of November 2008 and in all 17 Councillors are declared to be elected including the petitioners. The petitioners belong to Congress (I) political party. There are six members belonging to Congres...
Uttam Ganpat Ubale and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through th ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: May-05-2012
Oral Judgment: (Naresh H Patil, J.) 1) Heard. 2) Rule, made returnable forthwith. By consent heard finally. 3) These petitions raise identical issue in respect of payment of rental compensation and interest under Government Resolution dated 1st December 1972 and Government Resolution dated 2nd April 1979. In the group of 22 petitions, in Writ Petition No.21 of 2010 and Writ Petition No.6190 of 2010, the petitioners contend that their applications for claiming rental compensation and benefit under Government Resolution dated 1st December 1972 and Government Resolution dated 2nd April 1979 have been kept pending by the concerned Collectorate / Special Land Acquisition Officers. The learned Additional Government Pleader, Shri. K.B. Choudhari, on instructions of responsible officers, submits that possession of the subject land was taken after issuance of Section 4(1) notification under the Land Acquisition Act 1894, therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for claiming rental compensati...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›