Mumbai Aurangabad Court June 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahavirchand S/O Suganchand Deoda and anr. Vs. Ashaykumar S/O Bhavarsi ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Jun-29-2011
1 Appellants herein are raising exception to the order passed by Arbitral Tribunal on 11.05.2011. 2 Appellants and respondents are the partners of a partnership firm named and styled as `M/s Paras' and dealing in the business of sale of clothes manufactured by Raymond Mills on retail basis. There arose certain differences between the partners, which led to filing of an application by respondent no.1 herein, being Arbitration Application No.03 of 2008, seeking appointment of Arbitrator to resolve disputes and differences between the parties. Considering the arbitration agreement incorporated in the Deed of Partnership, this Court directed appointment of panel of arbitrators. The panel consists of two Chartered Accountants - each one suggested by either of the parties and a Presiding Arbitrator is appointed by this Court from amongst the names of retired High Court Judges suggested by both the parties. Shri Justice N.P.Chapalgaonkar, retired Judge of this Court, is appointed as Presiding...
Manikrao S/O. Krishnathrao Salunke Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Jun-29-2011
1. This appeal is filed against judgment and order of Special Case No. 8/1995 which is decided by Special Judge, Osmanabad. The appellant is convicted and sentenced for offences punishable under sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [ "PC Act" for short]. 2. It is the case of the prosecution that original complainant Prabhakar Kardhore was working in army at the relevant time and he had some matter pending with Tahsil Officer Omerga, District Osmanabad. The complainant belongs to village Kate-chincholi, District Osmanabad where there was earthquake on 30.9.1993. It is the case of the complainant that he was having a separate house in the village and it collapsed in the earthquake. It is the case of the complainant that partition had taken place amongst complainant and his two brothers in the year 1984 and due to partition he was having 1 H. 34 R. agricultural land in his village. 3. For rehabilitation of persons affected due to afo...
Vithal Mhasuji Gadhe Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Jun-17-2011
1. The challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment and order dated 7-12-2000, rendered by the learned IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 16 of 1998. 2. It appears that the accused nos.1 to 5 faced the trial under Sessions Case No. 16 of 1998 for the charges levelled against them under Sections 498-A, 306, 323, 504, read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, and the appellant herein i.e. original accused no.1 was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 306 and 323 of Indian Penal Code, and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months, for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code, and was also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 3000/-, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months, for the offence punishable under Section 30...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›