Mumbai Aurangabad Court April 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay S/O Madhavrao Suryawanshi. Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-20-2011
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 28.2.2001, rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nilanga in Sessions Case No. 10 of 2000, thereby convicting the appellant herein i.e. original accused no.1 for the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer R.I. for one month with fine of Rs.300/, in default of payment of fine to suffer further R.I. for seven days; and also convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer S.I. till rising of the court with fine of Rs.50/ and for non payment of fine amount further to suffer S.I. for one day, and also directing that both the substantive sentences to run concurrently, and the appellant herein questioned the said convictions and sentences in the present appeal. 2. In fact, the appellant herein (original accused no.1) and his wife, namely Kachrubai i.e. original accused no.2 faced the trial for the off...
The State of Maharashtra Vs. Bhagwat Naroji Chavan and ors.
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-01-2011
Judgment 01. Heard learned counsel for the parties.02. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.1.2000 rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Purna, District Parbhani, in Regular Criminal Case No.485 of 1997, thereby acquitting the respondents herein (original accused) for the offences punishable under Sections 326 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.03. The factual matrix of the matter, which gave rise to the present appeal, is as mentioned below;It is the case of the prosecution that on 27.4.1997 at about 22.00 hours at village Satephal, in front of statue of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, the accused persons, in furtherance of their common intention, asked the complainant Prabhakar Eknathrao Chavan as to why he had filed application for closure of their liquor shop, and they abused him. It is alleged that accused No.1 Bhagwant Chavan assaulted the complainant by an axe, and accused No.2 Dnyaneshwar Chavan caught hold of the complai...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›