Madhya Pradesh Court December 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pramod Kumar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-28-2015
Heard on this first application for bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C filed on behalf of the applicants Pramod and Shaikhar in Crime No.287/2015 registered by P.S. Mungwani, District-Narsinghpur for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354-A read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. As per the prosecution case, the prosecutrix, who is 15 years of age, was going alone to answer call of nature at about 5:30 a.m behind the High School. She was intercepted by accused persons Pramod and Shaikhar. Shaikhar said that he liked her and Pramod picked her up and they were taking her away. When the prosecutrix raised an alarm, her aunt who was passing by, reached the spot. At the same time, the watchman of the school also reached the spot, thereafter, the applicants escaped from the spot. It has been submitted on behalf of the applicants that the charge-sheet in the case has been filed. The applicants have been in custod...
J.B. Mangharam Mazdoor Sangh Thr Vs. J.B. Mangharam Karmchari Union Th ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2015
With the consent of parties, the mater is heard finally. In this writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has assailed the validity of the ex parte interim order dated 16.11.2015, by which, the Industrial Court has stayed the order passed by the Registrar, Trade Union dated 31.10.2015 and has fixed the case for final arguments on 15.12.2015. 2. Facts giving rise to filing of the writ petition, briefly stated, are that petitioner is a registered. Trade Union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926. The petitioner as well as respondent No.1 are the Trade Unions Registered under the provisions of the Trade Unions Act. It is the case of the petitioner that respondent No.1 is a Union sponsored by the Management of the Undertaking and is no longer enjoying the support and faith of the majority of the workmen of the industry. The petitioner-union submitted an application under section 17 of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to...
Shankar Sharma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition by way of Public Interest Litigation. The petitioner's contention is that he is a social worker and has no personal interest in the matter. He is aggrieved by posting of Patwaris by the Collector, Shivpuri in the year 2014. The petitioner's contention is that there were 38 posts available and 39 Patwaris were appointed meaning thereby one person is in excess. Ithas been further argued that the Collector has not followed the prescribed procedure for appointing the Patwaris as per the M.P.Land Revenue Code. The petitioner has prayed for the following relief. A. That as per direction Annexure P-1, P- 2 and P-3 the inquiry against misconduct of the Joint Collector Smt.Neetu Mathur be directed to be conduct by the authority above rank of Collector which is Additional Commissioner Gwalior and Commissioner Gwalior and the posting list of the Patwari which has been issued by the Joint Collector Shivpuri dated 01.03.2014 by her own...
Deputy Director of Income-tax (Investigation), Ujjain Vs. Nayan Kothar ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
S.R. Waghmare, J. 1. These two petitions are taken up together since they arise out of the same cause of action and are therefore, decided by this common order, which shall govern both the petitions. 2. By Writ Petition No. 4941/2014 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Dy. Director of Income Tax (Investigation) Ujjain is aggrieved against the order dated 23/4/2014 passed by the JMFC, Badnagar, Ujjain in Case No. 01/2014, whereby the JMFC ordered that security be paid for the supurdgi of the cash and silver that were to be handed over to the petitioner Income Tax. 3. Whereas, Writ Petition No. 5602/2014 under Article 226 read with Article 19(g) of the Constitution of India has been filed by Rupam, Rajendra P. Gorecha and Nayan Kothari against the Income Tax Department being aggrieved by withholding of the silver bullion without any authority of law. 4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 11.3.2014, information was received by the petitioner department from t...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›