Madhya Pradesh Court May 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kallu Khan Vs. Wakf Intajamiya Committee and Another
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-05-2014
Rohit Arya, J: 1. This appeal by plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree dated 24/6/2010 in Civil Appeal No. 16A/2009 confirming the judgment and decree dated 27/6/2009 in Civil Suit No. 10-A/2009. 2. Facts in nutshell are to the effect that plaintiff/appellant claims to be in possession of the suit shop on monthly rent of 200/-. The suit shop belongs to Wakf Intajamiya Committee and he is in possession thereof as a tenant on monthly rent payable to the defendant no. 1. He has paid rent upto February, 2007, however, defendant no. 2 appears to have become Manager by constituting a separate Wakf Intajamiya Committee and served a notice upon appellant/plaintiff to vacate the aforesaid premises, hence, plaintiff was in confusion as to whether defendant no. 1 or defendant no. 2 is managing wakf property and, therefore, he also served a notice upon defendant no. 1 dated 29/1/2009 and in response thereto plaintiff was required to vacate the suit premises and since he was threate...
Badrilal Patidar Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Another
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-2014
Prakash Shrivastava, J: 1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the Order dated 20th June, 2011 passed by the respondents cancelling the empanelment of the petitioner for allotment of retail outlet dealership. 2. In brief, the respondents had issued the advertisement dated 16/10/2009 inviting applications for allotment of retail outlet at "Tanodia" (on right hand side on Ujjain Kota Road), District Shajapur in open category. The petitioner had filed an application in pursuance to the advertisement on 10/12/2009 along with the relevant documents. The petitioner was called for the interview on 13/6/2010 and thereafter the results were declared and the petitioner was placed and empanelled at Sl.No.1 in the list of selected applicants. Thereafter the petitioner had received the impugned communication dated 20/6/2011 cancelling the empanelment, therefore, the petitioner after making a representation to the respondents has approached this Court by way ...
Dileep and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Police Station ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2014
B.D. Rathi J. 1. The present judgment shall govern the disposal of both the cases (Cr.A.No.103/1999 and Cr.A.No.507/2003). Criminal Appeal No.103/1999 under Section 374 of the Code has been preferred by the appellant/accused against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 11-02-1999 passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Bhind in S.T. No.93/1998 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304-B of IPC and sentenced to undergo 10 years' rigorous imprisonment. Criminal Appeal No.507/2003 under Section 378 of the Code has been preferred by the State against the same judgment whereby respondents (remaining accused persons) have been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 304-B of Indian Penal Code (in short IPC ). 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the marriage of accused Dileep and Kalpana had taken place on 26-05-1994 at Bhind. After marriage Kalpana started living at village Kanathar and prior to death she was ...
Ramu and Others Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh through Police Station ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2014
B.D. Rathi, J. 1. This appeal, under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.11.1999 passed by Special and Sessions Judge, Shivpuri (M.P.) in Special Sessions Trial No.122/97 whereby all the accused/appellants have been convicted under Section 148 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. They have further been convicted under Section 302/149 of IPC and under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life each with a fine of Rs.2,000/- each with default stipulation. 2. At the outset, it may be mentioned here that since appellants No.2 and 8, namely Sardar Singh and Sarwanlal Rawat, have died and their names have been deleted vide orders dated 24/06/2009 and 21/12/2012, hence, this appeal stands dismissed against them as abated. Now, the appeal will survive only against rem...
State of M.P. and Others Vs. Magilal Bohare (deceased) through LRs. As ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2014
B.D. Rathi, J: 1. This appeal has been preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent (M.P.) on being aggrieved by the order dated 24/9/94 passed by the learned Single Bench of this court in Writ Petition No.834/86 (Mangilal and others v. State of M.P. and others). 2. The facts leading to filing the appeal may be summarised as under:- On 9/2/1961, Tehsildar, Guna auctioned some of the plots comprised in Survey No. 883 and 656/1, which was duly sanctioned by the Collector and thereafter sale certificates were issued to the concerned persons. The petitioner Mangilal and others who came up before the writ court were such of the persons in whose favour sale certificates were issued. Later on, it was found by the superior authority that process of auction initiated on the orders of the Collector was against the provisions of law. Thereafter, the matter was again taken up and notices were issued to the petitioners. But at the time of conclusion, it was opined by the Collector that since req...
Vijay Bajaj Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh through Principal Secretary, T ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2014
B.D. Rathi, J. 1. Present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petition on being aggrieved by the order dated 6/2/14 as well as 27/4/13 as per Annexures P/1 and P/4 passed by the State (Transport Appellate Tribunal, Gwalior, in Revision No.218/13 and by the Regional Transport Authority, Sagar, i.e. respondent No.2, herein, praying for following reliefs: (i) Issuing a writ of certiorari or any suitable writ, order or direction by quashing the impugned orders dated 27/4/13 and 6/2/14 (Annexure-P/4 and P/1) passed by the Respondent No.2, RTA and STAT, respectively. (ii) Passing of any other order/direction, which may deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be passed. (2) On going through the pleadings and averments, it emerges that the petitioner is a holder of regular stage carriage permit bearing No.14/Damoh/2005-06 on Hatta to Jabalpur via Bangaon Damoh Abhana, Taijghar Tandukheda Pandajhir Patan Nunsar Route for ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›