Madhya Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Biresh Kumar Singh Vs. State of M.P. and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
1. This revision has been filed by the applicant under Section 397/401 of the Cr.PC being aggrieved by order dated 5-8-2013 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sidhi whereby the application filed by the applicant under Section 451/457 of the Cr.PC for releasing the vehicle on Supurdginama has been dismissed. 2. The facts, in short, giving rise to this revision are that the applicant is a farmer and owner of Tata-407 vehicle bearing No. MP 53-GA-2054. He sent his driver with vehicle to purchase Sand for his personal use (for construction of his house). The driver was having all valid documents of vehicle and also having transit pass to transport the Sand. Despite that, the prosecution has registered an offence as Forest Offence Case No. 471/20 on 23-6-2013 against the driver for the offence punishable under Sections 27, 29, 39 and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act alleging that he was unauthorisedly transporting the Sand from the protected area, i.e., Son Ghariya Wild Life Sanctuary...
State of M.P. and Others Vs. Omprakash Kumud and Another
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
This intra court appeal is directed against the order dated 24.01.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.2724/2006 (s). As there is a delay of 159 days in filing the appeal, IA No.9139/2007, an application seeking condonation of the delay has been filed. On due consideration of the application, we find that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Accordingly, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. With consent, heard finally. The respondent herein filed the aforesaid writ petition seeking direction to the appellants to comply with Kramonnati order dated 30.06.2000, which was passed in his favour. The Writ Court, after exhaustively dealing with the issue involved in the matter, allowed the writ petition in following terms: - After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record it is apparent that the petitioners were allowed benefit of Kramonnati on completion of 12 years of service in the scale of Rs.3,500-80-4,700-100-...
Narendra Singh Verma Vs. State of M.P. and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge is made to the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 10.7.2013 (Annexure P-1) by which petitioner s promotion to the post of Inspector vide order dated 31-5-2013 has been cancelled purportedly on the premise that the Review Petition No. 385/2012 filed by the State Government was pending consideration before the High Court seeking review of order dated 4-5-2012 passed in Writ Petition No. 2959/2012. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner in the Writ Petition No. 2959/2012 had challenged the legality and validity of the order of punishment whereby penalty of withholding one increment with cumulative effect for one year was imposed upon the petitioner. That writ petition was allowed in the light of the judgment passed by the Principal Seat in Dal Chand Ahirwar s case in Writ Petition No. 2897/2007 and one reported in 2012 (1) MPLJ 67, Nandkishore Vs. State of M.P., on the premise that the order of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›