Madhya Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maharana Pratap Academy Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Give ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
1 W.P.No.12282/2010. 24.2.2014. Shri Deepak Awasthy, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned G.A.for the respondents. The petitioner sought the following reliefs : 1. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue to direct the respondents to act in accordance with permission granted vide letter dated 6.2.2009 (Annexure P.5).2. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction that letter dated 11.9.2009 (Ann. P.10).issued by the respondent No.2 has not application to the petitioner. 3. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue any other writ, directions, order which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case. It is submitted that the petitioner is a recognized institution, empowered to issue certificate for Computer Education. Entire case is based on the strength of letter dated 6.2.2009 (Ann. P.5).It is submitted that on the basis of Annexure P.5, the relief as prayed in the petition ...
Devendra Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
Devendra Kumar Mishra & ORS.versus State of M.P.and Others Writ Petition No.17372 / 2013 (s) 21.02.2014 Shri Amaresh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Amit Pandey, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondents/State. The petitioners claim grant of regular pay scale from the initial date of appointment. The benefit is claimed by the petitioner in the light of the order passed by the Division Bench at Indore Bench of this Court, in W.A.No.346/2008 (Smt. Usha Ranawat versus State of M.P.and others).dated 18-12-2008. By the aforesaid order passed, more than 25 writ appeals claiming similar benefits were decided and it was directed that the benefit of pay fixation in the regular pay scale from the initial date of appointment shall be made to the petitioners therein. In fact the Division Bench has upheld the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in various cases and while deciding the writ appeals in para-19 the following directions were issued by the Division Bench: 19. In vi...
Smt. Abha Goel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
Smt. Abha Goel versus State of M.P.Criminal Revision No.1921 / 2012 21.2.2014. Shri Mahendra Saraf, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Amit Pandey, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. Challenging the order dated 18.6.2012 passed by the Additional Session Judge Umariya in Sessions Trial No.66/2011 framing charges of offence under Section 420, 467, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of IPC against the applicant, this revision petition has been filed. Complainant Tara Singh Gond filed a complaint indicating that by manipulating bank record fraud has been committed and a sum of Rs.15,000/- has been misappropriated by the present applicant and one Shri Rajesh Pandey, who are working in the Satpuda Narmada Kshetriya Gramin Bank. Based on the same an FIR was lodged, investigation was conducted and charges were framed. Except for contending that without appreciation of documents and material available on record charges have been framed no material is adduced before this court as to how fram...
NajimuddiIn Saiffi Vs. Bhopal Nagrik Sahkahari Bank Ltd. Judgement Giv ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
1 M. Cr.C.No.13083/13. 21.2.2014. Shri Vivek Baderiya, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Surendra Verma, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard. This petition is preferred on behalf of the applicant under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the order dated 16.8.2013 passed by 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Criminal Revision No.343/13, affirming the order dated 22.5.2013 passed by the JMFC, Bhopal in a Misc. Criminal (Private complaint) case No.5299/08, whereby in a proceeding filed by the respondent under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act the right of the applicant to cross-examine the respondent's witness the complaint himself has been closed. After taking me through the impugned orders of the subordinate courts along with the papers placed on record, the counsel of the petitioner argued that on the aforesaid date fixed for cross-examination of the respondent's witness the counsel of the applicant namely Shri Arun Sharma being out of station was not av...
Devendra Singh Vs. the Board of Revenue Gwalior Judgement Given By: Ho ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
- 1 -1 W.A.No.1019/2013 21/2/2014 : Shri Anand Chourasiya, learned counsel for the appellants. This appeal has been filed under Section 2(1) of the M.P.Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, challenging an order dated 12.9.2013 passed by the Writ Court in W.P.No.14878/2013. The appellants herein Shri Devendra Singh and another had filed writ petition and in the writ petition challenge was made to an order Annexure P/6 dated 7.5.2013 passed by the Board of Revenue exercising the powers of revision and interfering with an order dated 10.3.2004 passed by the Naib Tahsildar, Ghubara in a Revenue Case directing for modification of entries made in the revenue record with regard to the disputed land in question. Two grounds have been canvassed to challenge the order of the Board of Revenue. The fiRs.ground is that against the order passed by the Naib Tahsildar, a revision under Section 50 of the M.P.Land Revenue Code was not maintainable before the Board of Revenue exercisi...
Rajbhan @ Rajman Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
1 M. Cr.C.No.2320/2014. 21.2.2014. Shri S.D.Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Arvind Singh, learned P.L.for the respondent/ State. Heard. This petition is preferred on behalf of the applicant for modification of the order dated 3.2.2014 passed in M. Cr.C.No.895/2014, granting bail to the applicant Rajbhan in connection of Crime No.272/2013, registered at Police Station Naigarhi, district Rewa. As per averments of the petition the father's name of the applicant is Mahavir Yadav and same was stated before the Sessions Court on filing the bail application and pursuant to it the same was stated by the Sessions court in rejection order dated 8.1.2014 but on filing aforesaid M. Cr.C.No.895/2014 before this Court due to typographical error happened in the office of the applicant's counsel the name of the father of the applicant was stated as MahadeV Yadav instead of Mahavir Yadav. So, on allowing such petition in the aforesaid bail order the father's name of the applicant Mahade...
General Manager Vs. Summi Lal Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
Misc. Appeal No.1973/2012. 21.2.2014. Ms.Kanak Gaharawar, learned counsel for appellant. Shri Amit Shukla, learned counsel for respondent. There is delay of 307 days in filing the present appeal. I.A.No.9480/2012, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay. The appeal, as apparent, is directed against award- dated 5.5.2011 passed in Case No.96/06 by the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Labour Court, Jabalpur. Being aggrieved, appellant preferred a Review Application No.49/2011. The said application was dismissed on 21.3.2012 by the Commissioner. It is contended that since the appellant was prosecuting the review application diligently and hopeful of being successful in the said application; however after its rejection, since the appellant was relegated of the status, being burdened with the award, steps were taken for challenging the same and in pursuance thereto, some delay has occurred. Respondent, on being noticed, has chosen not to fil...
Dr. Rajendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
W.P.No.2909/2014 20.2.2014 Shri K.C.Ghildiyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State on advance copy. The petitioner, who was holding the substantive rank of Chief Medical and Health Officer equivalent to the post of Deputy Director Health Services, was made to officiate on the post of Joint Director, Health Services. The petitioner was placed under suspension vide an order dated 2.12.2013 issued by the State on the ground that there were certain irregularities committed by the petitioner while discharging the duties on the said post. Later on, the State Government after receipt of the reply of the petitioner, revoked the order of suspension and posted him on his substantive post of Deputy Director, Health Services, Bhopal. The said order dated 11.2.2014 is called in question in this writ petition. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner was having no lien on the place of posting, b...
Ram Gopal Singh Vs. the State of M.P. and Ors. Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
1 W.P.No.6412/2005 20/02/2014 Shri S.K.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents-State. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, heard finally. The only grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is that while exercising the power of disciplinary authority, the petitioner was placed under suspension and a charge sheet was issued to him by the Principal of College at Betul. The enquiry was conducted, some sort of report was received and ultimately, a final order was passed in the enquiry on 15.3.2004 contained in Annx.P/15. The petitioner was not visited with any penalty, but only this much was said that the petitioner will obtain a medical fitness certificate with respect to his mental condition from the District Medical Board and will give his joining along with the said certificate on the post of Assistant Grade-III in the Government College at Obedullagan...
Smt. Kamla Bhalavi Vs. Assistant Commissioner Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
WRIT PETITION No.2091/2014 1 20.02.2014 Shri Pradeep Naveriya, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The writ petition is filed against the order passed by the respondent No.1 but as required, the State is not impleaded as a party in the writ petition. However, to safeguard the interest of the petitioner, who is not to suffer on account of lapses on the part of the counsel for the petitioner, on an oral prayer, the State is directed to be impleaded as a party in the writ petition. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 28.01.2014 issued by the respondent No.1 by which changing the posting of the petitioner as Superintendent of the Girls Hostel, the respondent No.2 is posted in her place. The only reason assigned in the said order is that some sort of complaint was received against the petitioner, said to be made by an Association on 28.01.2014. No opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner in respect of such complaint and impugned order...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »