Madhya Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Feeroj Akhtar Ansari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given B ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
1 W.P.No.1836/2014 W.P.No.1836/2014 06.02.2014 Shri A.K.Rawat, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri S.S.Bisen, Learned Government Advocate for respondents/State. Petitioners initially appointed as Shiksha Karmis under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998. Subsequently, being absorbed as Sahayak Adhyapaks in pursuance to the Madhya Pradesh Adhyapak Samvarg (Employment and Conditions of service) Rules 2008 and granted regular pay-scale with effect from 01.04.2007 seeks direction to the respondents to grant regular pay-scale from the date of their initial appointment as Shiksha Karmi. During the couRs.of submission, it is being stated by learned counsel for petitioners that similarly situated persons have approached this Court vide writ petition No.602/2010(s) : Mohanlal and ors.v.State of Madhya Pradesh decided on 22.01.2010 & writ petition No.4720/2013 : Jitendra Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh and these...
Vivek Kumar Khare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
1 W.P.No.2134/2014 W.P.No.2134/2014 06.02.2014 Shri R.P.Dubey, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri S.S.Bisen, Learned Government Advocate for respondent/State. Petitioners initially appointed as Shiksha Karmis under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998. Subsequently, being absorbed as Sahayak Adhyapaks in pursuance to the Madhya Pradesh Adhyapak Samvarg (Employment and Conditions of service) Rules 2008 and granted regular pay-scale with effect from 01.04.2007 seeks direction to the respondents to grant regular pay-scale from the date of their initial appointment as Shiksha Karmi. During the couRs.of submission, it is being stated by learned counsel for petitioners that similarly situated persons have approached this Court vide writ petition No.602/2010(s) : Mohanlal and ors.v.State of Madhya Pradesh decided on 22.01.2010 & writ petition No.4720/2013 : Jitendra Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh and these ...
Smt. Sushma Verma(soni) Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Give ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
1 W.P.No.1569/2014 W.P.No.1569/2014 06.02.2014 Shri A.K.Chaturvedi, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri S.S.Bisen, Learned Government Advocate for respondents/State. Petitioners initially appointed as Shiksha Karmis under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998. Subsequently, being absorbed as Adhyapak in pursuance to the Madhya Pradesh Adhyapak Samvarg (Employment and Conditions of service) Rules 2008 and granted regular pay-scale with effect from 01.04.2007 seeks direction to the respondents to grant regular pay-scale from the date of their initial appointment as Shiksha Karmi. During the couRs.of submission, it is being stated by learned counsel for petitioners that similarly situated persons have approached this Court vide writ petition No.602/2010(s) : Mohanlal and ors.v.State of Madhya Pradesh decided on 22.01.2010 & writ petition No.4720/2013 : Jitendra Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh and these pet...
Rajesh Phulmari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Ho ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
1 W.P. No. 1143 Of 2013 6.2.2014 Shri V.D.S Chouhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Government Advocate for respondent State on advance notice. Heard on admission. Order dated 25.10.2012 passed by Chief Medical and Health Officer, Balaghat is being assailed vide this petition; whereby, claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground in lieu of death of his father Shri Sharad Phulmari has been negatived on the ground that the petitioner's father was employed on Workcharged and Contingency Paid Establishment. Father of the petitioner was engaged as Driver on the Contingency Paid Establishment and died in harness on 24.9.1999. His widow received family pension from the department. She also expired on 3.9.2009. The petitioner thereafter filed an application for appointment on compassionate ground in ...
Brijesh Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
1 W.P.2015/2014 Writ Petition No.2015/2014 06.02.2014 Shri K.C.Ghildiyal, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Government Advocate for State of Madhya Pradesh on advance notice. Heard on admission. Communication dated 30.11.2013 by the Chief Medical & Health Officer, Rewa; whereby, the petitioners have been informed as to reasons why they are not eligible for being appointed as Pharmacist (contractual) has been assailed. The petitioners also seek quashment of select list dated 31.07.2013 and for direction to consider the candidature of the petitioners for appointment as Pharmacist (contractual).Relevant facts in nutshell are that the applications were invited on 26.12.2012 for appointment as Pharmacists, Data Entry Operators and Support Staff on contract basis in National Rural Health Mission from the persons having requisite qualification. The last date for submitting the applications was 15.01.2013. The petitioners though Diploma/Degree in Pharmacy were not registe...
Smt. Shilpi Mishra Vs. State of M.P. General Administration Department ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
1 W.P.No.1642/2014 W.P.No.1642/2014 06.02.2014 Shri Sankalp Kochar, learned counsel for petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Government Advocate for State of Madhya Pradesh on advance notice. Heard on admission. While seeking quashment of order dated 28.02.2013, petitioner also seeks quashment of clause 2.2 of order dated 22.01.2007. Whereas, by order dated 28.02.2013 claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground in lieu of death of her father has been negatived on the ground that she does not fall in the category of person who are entitled for appointment on compassionate ground as stipulated in clause 2.2 of the circular No.C-3-7-2000-3-,d Bhopal dated 22.01.2007. Clause 2.2 of the circular dated 22.01.2007 stipulates : **2-2 fnoaxr 'kldh; lsod dk iq=].vFkok vfookfgr iq=h vFkok ,slh fookfgr iq=h ftlds ifr dh e`R;q gks pqdh gks vFkok tks rykd'kqnk gks].fdUrq 'krZ ;g gksxh fd ,slh vfookfgr].fookfgr vFkok rykd'kqnk iq=h fnoaxr 'kkldh; lsod dh e`R;q ds le; ml ij iwoZr% v...
Dhrmendra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
M.Cr.C.No.9151/2013 5/02/2014 Shri Priyank Choubey, Advocate for the applicant. Shri C.K.Mishra, GA for the respondent/State. Heard finally. This is the second application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail. The fiRs.application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 18/04/2013. Applicant has been arrested on 22/12/12 in connection with Crime No.940/12 registered at P.S.Motinagar, District Sagar for the offence punishable under sections 307 later on 302, 404 read with section 34 of IPC and section 25 (b) of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that after withdrawal of fiRs.application, the witnesses Rewaram and Arjun have been examined before the trial Court. They have not supported the prosecution case. It is further submitted that as per prosecution at the time of incident, applicant was having a lathi. The deceased sustained as many as four lacerated would out of which one on left eyebrow and second on right leg. The injury said ...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Onkar Singh Judgement Given By: Hon'bl ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
1 M.C.C.No.2051/2005. 5/2/2014. Mr.Rahul Jain, Dy. Advocate General for the applicants. None appears for the respondent, even though served. Seeking review of an order passed on 19.4.2004 in W.P.No.2645 of 2013, this application has been filed. Learned Single Bench of this court on 19.4.2004 disposed of the aforesaid writ petition directing the respondents to grant certain monetary benefits in the matter of payment of gratuity along with interest. It is pointed out by Shri Rahul Jain that the order was passed in the writ petition only on the ground that inspite of granting repeated opportunities, no return has been filed and in the absence of the return, an order was passed. It is the case of the State Government that the return was filed and it was available on record. The original records of the writ petition No.2645 of 2013 are available with us. It is seen that in the said records, the return filed by the State Government is available. The return is dated 24.3.2004 and it is seen t...
M/s Garden Pick Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India Judgement Given By ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
W.P.No.2053/2014 05/02/2014 Shri Ashish Shroti, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Shri Praveen Chaturvedi, Advocate for the respondents. Heard, counsel for the parties. This petition takes exception to the decision of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur dated 10.1.2014 in S.A.No.187/2013. The petitioner, in effect, is challenging the auction process in respect of Plot which is owned and possessed by him. The auction process has been completed by the respondent-Bank on 20.1.2014 by accepting highest bid given by Baibhav Patil of District Harda. Challenge to the said auction process before this Court is, essentially, on two counts. Firstly, about the irregularity committed by the Bank which precedes the stage of Section 13(4) of the Securitisation And Reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement Of Security Interest Act 2002 (for short the Act).The question is: whether the petitioner can be permitted to challenge the said infirmity at this belated stage having allowed the process from th...
Suyash Packaging Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: H ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
Writ Petition No.2059/2014 05.02.2014 Shri Abhishek Oswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Agarwal, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State. Heard counsel for the parties. As short question is involved, petition is taken up for final disposal forthwith, by consent. Although three separate orders have been challenged in this writ petition, however, if we were to accept the grievance of the petitioner in relation to the third order, the appropriate couRs.would be to relegate the parties before the Appellate Tribunal for reconsideration of annexure P/7, which was the application filed by the petitioner under Rule 61(4) of the M.P.V.A.T.Rules, 2006. Therefore, we would confine this order to the efficacy of the decision of the appropriate Authority on the said application dated 11.7.2013, annexure P/8. Although, the petitioner relied on the medical evidence in support of the ground that he could not remain present on the date of hearing of the appeal listed before the Appe...