Madhya Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shriram Genral Insurance Co.Ltd. Having Its Branch Office at Plot Vs. ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
:: 1 :: Misc. Appeal No.909/2013 20.2.2014 Shri Aditya Narayan, learned counsel for appellant. Shri Anoop Shrivastava, learned counsel for respondents. Heard. The judgment passed in present appeal shall also govern the final disposal of Misc. Appeal No.1109/2013. Both these appeals are directed against the Award dated 5.12.2012 passed by VIII Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bhopal; whereby, in lieu of death of Rohit @ Monu Dubey, 20 year-old-son of the claimants in an accident which occurred on 16.11.2011, when the offending Vehicle, bearing No.MP-04-GA-1254 dashed at the motorcycle driven by the deceased leading to the death and severe injuries to pillion-rider, an amount of Rs.4,08,000/- has been awarded. Both these appeals are in respect of quantum. Whereas, the Insurance Company : Appellant in Misc. Appeal No.909/2013 alleges that with wrong application of deduction towards personal expenses compensation on the higher side has been awarded. The claimants, on the other h...
Alok Kumar Sharma and Anr. Vs. the State of M.P. and Ors. Judgement Gi ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
W.P.No.4494/2000 & W.P.No.608/2000 20/2/2014 Shri Raman Patel, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for the respondents State Government. As common questions of law and facts are involved in both these petitions they are being disposed of by this common order. In both these cases petitioners were working in the Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission in District Sidhi. By the impugned order dated 1.10.2000 passed by the Collector of the District concerned who is also the Director and Implementing Authority of the Mission, as their services have been terminated, these writ petitions were filed in the year 2000. According to the petitioners they were appointed for working in the Mission under the Shiksha Guarantee Scheme Introduced for providing basic education to children particularly in rural area and under the Education Guarantee Scheme they were appointed in non formal education centres operated in the remote areas by the Panchayat concerned. It is said that...
Mohan Singh and Ors. Vs. the State of M.P. and Ors. Judgement Given By ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
W.P.No.4494/2000 & W.P.No.608/2000 20/2/2014 Shri Raman Patel, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for the respondents State Government. As common questions of law and facts are involved in both these petitions they are being disposed of by this common order. In both these cases petitioners were working in the Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission in District Sidhi. By the impugned order dated 1.10.2000 passed by the Collector of the District concerned who is also the Director and Implementing Authority of the Mission, as their services have been terminated, these writ petitions were filed in the year 2000. According to the petitioners they were appointed for working in the Mission under the Shiksha Guarantee Scheme Introduced for providing basic education to children particularly in rural area and under the Education Guarantee Scheme they were appointed in non formal education centres operated in the remote areas by the Panchayat concerned. It is said that...
Ku. Jyoti Yaduwanshi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given B ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
W.A.No.116/2014 20.2.2014 Shri A.D.Mishra, counsel for appellant. This appeal is directed against an order dated 29.1.2014, by which a writ petition preferred by the appellant seeking a direction to the respondents for issuance of online advertisement for her appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-II, has been dismissed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for appellant that though the appellant is an untrained candidate, but in the light of Clause 10 of Schedule II of the M.P.Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak (Employment and Conditions of Contract) Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred as 'Rules of 2005' for short).still she be considered for the post. It is also submitted that 91 posts are still lying vacant because of non-availability of qualified persons, so untrained persons may be appointed as per Clause 10 of Schedule II of the Rules of 2005 on the aforesaid post. We have considered the contention of the appellant, who reiterated the same which was raised before t...
Smt.Gauri Bai Vs. General Manager Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Jus ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
1 W.P.No.184/2007(s) Writ Petition No.184/2007 (s) 20.02.2014 Shri Rakesh Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner. Heard on admission. Petitioner seeks direction to respondents to release pension since 08.12.1990 and appoint her or her son on compassionate ground in lieu of death of her husband. Pleadings reveal that husband of the petitioner was employed as Clipman at Shivpuri Mines, Western Coal Field Area Limited, Pench Area Parasiya. He was dismissed from services for remaining unauthorized absence since 07.06.1988 by order dated 08.12.1990. That, in 2004 the petitioner sought declaration from the trial Court in civil suit 46-A/2004 decreed on 24.09.2004, as to civil death of her husband, on the ground that, for seven years his whereabouts are not known. On the strength of the declaration in civil suit, petitioner approached the Authorities for pension and compassionate appointment. The question is when once removed from services on a charge of unauthorized absence, whether on the b...
Brijendra Singh Vs. Secretary School Education Department Judgement Gi ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
WRIT PETITION No.613/2014 1 19.02.2014 Shri Anirudh Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioneRs.It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioners that in terms of the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998, the petitioners would be entitled to grant of regular pay scale of the post of Shiksha Karmi. However, such a claim is not being considered, therefore, this writ petition is required to be filed. It is contended that identical claim was made before the Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.602/2010 (S) by certain teachers of the similar category namely Mohanlal & others and the said writ petition has been disposed of vide order dated 22.01.2010 directing consideration of the claim of the persons like petitioneRs.It is, thus, contended that similar treatment may be given to the petitioneRs.This Court in the case of Mohanlal (supra) has passed the following order : Accordingly, without commenting upon the mer...
Bhailal Tiwari Vs. Lalmani Pathak and Anr. Judgement Given By: Hon'ble ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
Criminal Revision No.1047/2003 19.02.2014 Shri Akhil Sinha, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Akshay Namdeo, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.2-State. Heard on PUD received from Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa. The PUD is sent by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa vide letter dated 26.11.2013 that the matter was registered in the year 1993 and the record of the trial Court was requisitioned by this Court in the year 2003 and in such circumstances the trial is held up. Looking to the delay in the trial whereas no proceeding was proceeded further in the present revision, it would be proper to send the record of the trial Court back to the trial Court so that the trial Court may proceed with the trial. Consequently, PUD dated 26.11.2013 is hereby disposed off with a direction that the record of ST No.58/1993 be immediately sent back to the trial Court. At this stage, as prayed by learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard. The applicant has challenged the order dated 2...
Smt. Damyanti Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
Writ Petition No.21259/2011 19.2.2014. Shri Anand Chourasiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 4. Shri Y.M.Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Heard. Additional documents filed vide I.A.No.10845/2013 are taken on record. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is directed against order-dated 1.11.2011 passed by Additional Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar; whereby, while dismissing the appeal preferred by the petitioner against order- dated 14.7.2010 passed by Additional Collector, Sagar, has affirmed the appointment of respondent no.5 on the post of Anganwadi Karyakarta Anganwadi Centre Village Padrai. Selection for the post of Anganwadi Karyakarta, Anganwadi Centre Village Padrai was taken recouRs.to by the Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project Jaisinagar District Sagar in furtherance to the policy of the State Government vide Circular No.F-3/2/06/50/2 dated 10...
Venkat Udyog, Khandwa Vs. N.K.Mishra Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
CRR. No.1471/2005 19.2.2014 Shri Sameer Seth and Shri Ranjeet Singh, counsel for the applicant. Heard on admission. The applicant has moved the present revision against the order dated 18.8.2005 passed by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa in Criminal Revision No.85/2004 whereby the order dated 6.5.2004 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Criminal Complaint No.2304/2002 was set aside and complaint was dismissed. The facts of the case in short are that the applicant moved a criminal complaint through the holder of power of attorney for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against the respondents, which was registered and vide order dated 6.5.2004 objection made by the respondents was dismissed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and charges were framed. In the revision the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa found that the cheque was issued to the applicant Usha Rani because she was the Proprietor of the concerned industr...
Satguru Cement Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Giv ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
Writ Appeal No.603/2010 19.02.2014 None for the appellant. Shri Vivek Agrawal, learned Govt. Adv for respondent Nos.1 and 3. IA No.7363/10, an application for condonation of delay. There is delay of 98 days. Considering the reasons, stated in the application, in the interest of justice, the delay in filing this appeal is condoned. The matter is considered on merits. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.1.2010 by which the Writ Court has declined to vacate the ad interim writ and directed that the matter can be heard after the return is filed in this appeal. The objection is that the matter relates to the Mining Lease of an area at Dhar, which falls within the jurisdiction of Indore Bench of this Court and no cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this court. The order dated 28.1.2010 passed in W.P.No.8612/2009, reads thus :- 28.1.2010 Shri M.L.Jaiswal, Senior counsel with Ms.Annapurna Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.K.Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate for r...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »