Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N.M. Purushvani Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Ho ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
M.Cr.C.No.16209/13 29.01.2014 Shri Manish Datt, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Yogesh Soni, counsel for the applicants. Shri Yadavendra Dwivedi, learned P.L.for the State/respondent. Heard. On behalf of the applicants, this petition is preferred under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants as they are under apprehension of their arrest in connection of Crime No.14/10 registered at Police Station AJ.Bhopal for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 427 of I.P.C.and also under Section 3(1) (x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter in short the Act).Applicants counsel after taking me through the averments of the petition as well as the impugned order placed on the record so also by referring the copy of FIR of Crime No.527/10, registered at Kamla Nagar, Police Station Bhopal, argued that long before, the complainant Dalchand ,being their servant was working as Watchman at the disputed place...
Smt. Kishwar Sulatana Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
Misc. Criminal Case No.3922/2013 29.01.2014 Shri G.S.Ahluwalia, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Akhilendra Singh, Govt. Advocate for the respondent no.1/State. Smt. Shimla Jain, Advocate for the respondent Nos.2, 3, and 4. Present petition has been preferred against the order dated 18.3.2013 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in Criminal Revision No.41/2013, affirming the order dated 10.10.2012 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Satna under Section 133 of the Cr. P .C.in Criminal Case No.3/2012, directing for demolition of house in question in which petitioners hold a tenanted shop. According to petitioners/tenant, brief facts are that in the suit property petitioners run a cycle shop. Respondent is trying to dispossess the petitioners forcibly without adopting due process of law. Petitioners have preferred a civil suit against the respondents for declaration of tenancy and permitting them to restrain from causing any damage to the suit property. While respond...
Dushyant Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
Writ Petition No.5648/2013 29.1.2014. Shri Manish Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Government Advocate for the respondent-State of M.P.on advance notice. Heard. Vide present petition, the petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to appoint him on compassionate ground in lieu of death of his father. Father of the petitioner was employed as Accountant in Janpad Panchayat Birsa, Jila Panchayat Balaghat. He died in harness on 17.3.1997. That, an application was filed by the petitioner's mother for appointment on compassionate ground which was considered and vide communication dated 27.10.1999, the petitioner's mother was informed that for want of vacancy, no appointment on compassionate ground can be given. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application for appointment on compassionate ground on the anvil that he has now attained majority. The claim of the petitioner has been turned down vide communication dated 23.8.2012 on the ground that as per...
M/s Infra Developers Vs. the Secy.,Govt.Of Mp. Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
M/s Infra Developers versus State of MP & ORS.Writ Petition No.5785 / 2008 28/01/2014 Shri V.R.Rao, learned Sr.Counsel with Shri Kapil Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Government Advocate for the respondents/State. Challenging the action of the respondents in issuing a recovery order dated 15.4.2008 Annexure P-1 at the instance of the Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, petitioner has filed this writ petition. Petitioner was granted a contract vide written agreement Annexure P-2 on 14.2.2006 for widening and strengthening of road from K.m.1 to K.m.17 in National Highway No.86. Certain dispute arose in the matter of execution of contract and finally the dispute is now pending consideration before the M.P.Arbitration Tribunal in accordance to the arbitration clause available in the agreement. Grievance of petitioner is that without adjudication of the dispute in accordance to the arbitration agreement and in an illegal manner the revenue re...
S.K. Ghosh Vs. Smt. Apra Shahi Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justic ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
1 C.R.No.295/2013 C.R.No.295/2013 29.01.2014 Ms.C.V.Rao, learned counsel for petitioner. Shri Dhanraj Singh Choudhary, learned counsel for respondent No.1 & 2/plaintiffs. None for respondent No.3 though served. With consent of learned counsel for parties the matter is heard finally. This Civil Revision is directed against order dated 13.03.2013 in civil suit No.254-A/2012 passed by XII Civil Judge Class-I, Jabalpur. Vide said order an application preferred by the petitioner/defendant No.1 under Section 11 and under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') has been dismissed. Suit at the instance of respondents No.1 & 2/plaintiffs is for declaration, possession and permanent injunction in respect of 50 square feet of land appurtenant to the Duplex situated over land bearing diversion plot No.86-A/Bungalow No.1796 & 1796-A Unit No.D, Mauja Gorakhpur NB605 Ratan Colony, Jabalpur admeasuring 900 square feet built up area 1380 square feet ...
Ashok Kumar Chandanani Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
- 1 -1 M.Cr.C.No.8131/2013 29/1/2014 : Shri Abhay Shanker Pathak, learned counsel for the applicants. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Govt. Adv.for State/respondent. Seeking quashment of a criminal case registered against the applicants being Criminal Case No.23462/2008 pending before the Judicial Magistrate FiRs.Class, Bhopal for offence punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC, this application has been filed. Applicants herein entered into an agreement with respondents No.2 and 3 whereby it was agreed to between the parties for selling of 1.23 acres of land situated in Village Bairagarh, Tehsil Huzur, District Bhopal for a total consideration of Rs.91 Lacs. It is said that respondents No.2 and 3 proposed purchaser of the agreement and as per the agreement a sum of Rs.2 Lacs in cash, Rs.3 Lacs by Cheque dated 1.1.2007, Rs.5 Lacs by Cheque dated 2.1.2007 and Rs.10 Lacs on a subsequent date was paid as advance. It was agreed upon that the remaining amount shall be paid in three equ...
Dr. Kartar Singh Lahari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Give ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
Writ Petition No.2439/2013. 29.1.2014. Shri V.A.Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Rawat, Panel Lawyer for the respondents-State. Heard. PetitioneRs.Social WorkeRs.by way of present petition, seek direction to the respondents to operate and maintain Eye Hospital situated at Community Health Centre, Baihar, District Balaghat and to provide all facilities like doctORS.nurses, equipments and medicines at the said hospital. Respondents, on being noticed, have filed response stating therein that the Hospital in question was opened at Baihar with the aid and help of World Bank for the benefit of the tribal public in the year 1997 and presently, eye patients are being attended and treatment is being administered to them through various eye camps organized from time to time and in the year 2012-13, in Community Health Centre, Baihar, 97 operations have been successfully conducted. It is further contended that a regular specialist and ophthalmic assistant could not be posted...
Amlok Singh Tuteja Vs. Dr. Lakhan Lal Ahirwar Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
1 W.P.No.20354/2013 Writ Petition No.20354/2013 29/01/2014 Shri Ashok Lalwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on admission. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred by the petitioner assailing order dated 11.09.2013 passed in civil suit No.446-A/2008 by V Additional District Judge, Bhopal; whereby, application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') filed by the petitioner seeking impleadment in civil suit at the instance of respondent No.1/plaintiff has been rejected. Suit by respondent No.1 is for specific performance on an agreement dated 23.12.1990 and for declaration of sale deed dated 10.02.2000 executed in favour of defendants No.2 and 3 in respect of land bearing KhaSr.No.647 admeasuring 2.06 situated in village Bhouri, patwari circle No.25, Revenue circle 3, Block Fanda, Tehsil Huzur, District Bhopal as null and void and for execution of sale deed in his favour. Petitioner,...
Radheshyam @ Gablu Raghuwanshi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgeme ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
- 1 -1 M.Cr.C.No.137/2012 29/1/2014 : Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Govt. Adv.for the State. This is an application filed by the State Government under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C.seeking leave to appeal to challenge a judgment dated 30th August, 2011 passed by the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Sessions Trial No.677/2010 whereby the respondents have been aquitted of an offence under Section 392 of I.P.C.It was the case of the prosecution that on 16.4.2010 at about 7.30 in the evening complainant, a married lady was going to the market along with her husband for purchasing milk and bread, when two persons came in black motercycle and snatched her gold chain. Matter was reported to the police authorities and based on the material collected by the police authorities at the stage of investigation respondent was prosecuted. However, finding the prosecution to have failed to prove the allegation, the respondent has been acquitted and challenging the acquittal, this application is filed se...
Dileep Kumar Pandey Vs. Rewa - Sidhi GramIn Bank Judgement Given By: H ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
Writ Petition No.14917/2013. 29.1.2014. Shri R.S.Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Shroti, learned counsel for the respondents. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that issue raised in this petition is covered by the decision rendered in Writ Petition No.196/2013 [Rajesh Kumar Patel versus Madhyanchal Gramin Bank and others].decided on 3.12.2013, in the following terms - "Grievance raised by the petitioners vide these batch of Writ Petition is against the order dated 12.12.2012 whereby General Manager, Madhyanchal Gramin Bank has issued directions to all its branches that after amalgamation of the Rewa Sidhi Gramin Bank, the services of daily rated workers engaged in the constituent Bank would be placed at the disposal of Private Agencies who would henceforth be the agency to provide the daily wageRs.Madhyanchal Gramin Bank is a Regional Bank which has come into existence with amalgamation of three Regional Rural Banks, viz, Madhy...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »