Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajiv Chadha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'b ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
W.P.No.2126/2013 08.01.2014 Shri Akshay Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Shri Aditya Khandekar, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. Inviting attention of this Court to the order sheet dated 25.02.2013, it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that since the statement was made by learned Government Advocate that all actions against the petitioner are taken on the strength of the directions issued by the Regional office, M.P.State Pollution Control Board, no return was required to be filed by the State, the Pollution Control Board has been impleaded as a party. Upon notice of the writ petition a return has been filed, by respondent No.4. It is seen that this Court has allowed the petitioner to transport the mineral extracted before 03.03.2012, and for the said purposes transit passes were to be issued by the respondents/State. The statement is made today that the transit...
M/s K. Kapoor and P.R. Mahant Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgemen ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
Writ Petition No :: 21753 / 2013 M/s K. Kapoor and others versus State of MP and others 08.01.2014. Shri Saket Agrawal for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, Dy. Advocate General, for the State. Petitioners are licensed contractors and have been granted contract by the Railway Administration in the matter of carrying out certain business activities by establishing Food Stalls in the Railway Station. They feel aggrieved by notice- dated 26.7.2013 Annexure P/1, issued by the Chief Health and Food Inspector, Central Railway, Khandwa directing them to get registered and obtain license under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. According to the petitioneRs.the statutory date for obtaining the said license has been extended by the Central Government to 4.2.2014 and, therefore, before 4.2.2014 no coercive steps can be taken against them. It is indicated that the petitioners have already taken steps for obtaining the license and the prayer made is that before 4.2.2014, no action be taken ag...
Sunil Dubey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'bl ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
W.P.No.21054/2013 (Sunil Dubey versus State of MP and others ) 08.01.2014 Shri A.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by notice Annexure P/2 dated 23.02.2013 initiating the proceedings against the petitioner under the provisions of M.P.Lok Parisar (Bedakhali) Adhiniyam, 1974. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner pursuant to the aforesaid notice filed a reply before the authorities on 24.04.2013 and the matter is pending before the said authority. It is submitted that the petitioner was an employee of the respondent/Corporation but was superannuated under the V.R.S.Scheme against which the petitioner approached this court by filing W.P.No.11543/06(S) which has been allowed with a direction to the respondents/authorities to re-examine the matter and take a decision afresh till then status quo in respect of the order of superannuati...
Ravendra Singh Vs. Sonu Rajak Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
Ravendra Singh versus Sonu Rajak & ORS.Writ Petition No.1383 / 2013 8.1.2014: Shri Pramendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Shri N.S.Ruprah and Shri Aditya Narayan, learned counsel assisted this Court on request for resolving the dispute involved in the matter. Challenge in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is made to an interlocutory order dated 16.11.2012 passed by the MACT Katni rejecting an application filed by the petitioner. Petitioner is owner of the vehicle in question bearing No.M.P.20D-0102 (Maruti 800 Car).The vehicle met with an accident within the jurisdiction of Police Station Naurozabad District Umariya on 16.9.2011 in the evening around 5.30 to 6.00 pm, as a result of accident respondent no.1 sustained certain injuries. The vehicle was registered with the United India Insurance Company Limited vide Policy No.191402/31/11/02/00000004, Annexure P-2. The vehicle was insured in ...
Gajanand Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble S ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.1746/2010 Gajanand VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Surendra Patel, counsel for the applicant. Shri S.D.Khan, G.A. for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 8th day of January, 2014) The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under sections 452, 354 of IPC and sentenced for 3 months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/- for each count vide judgment dated 19.5.2010 passed by the learned JMFC, Seoni in criminal case No.4039/2008. His appeal No.70/2010 was dismissed in toto vide judgment dated 20.10.2010 by the learned Sessions Judge, Seoni. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid judgments, the applicant has preferred the present revision.2. The prosecution's case, in short, is that, on 28.12.2008, at abou...
Kashinath Agnihotri Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
W.P.No.2047/2013 Kashinath Agnihotri versus State of MP & ORS.08/01/2014 Shri S.K.Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is working as a Revenue Inspector and is presently posted in the office of Superintendent of Land Records Dindori. Petitioner claims grant of service benefit after completing 12 and 24 years of service and when the same was not granted, he represented to the Superintendent of Land Records, Dindori. Vide Annexure-P4 dated 16.1.2012, the Superintendent of Land Records Dindori informed the Tehsildar Teothar District-Rewa that the petitioner was working under his jurisdiction and as the service book and confidential report is available in the office of Tehsildar Teothar, District-Rewa, the same be granted to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of kramonnati. When this communication was made to the Tehsildar, Teothar, District- Rewa, the Tehsildar vide Annexure-P5 informed the Collector, Dindori that the exercise for grant of kramonnati, his offi...
Govind Prasad Vs. Ved Prakash Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
1 C.R.No.492/11. 8.1.2014. Shri A.K.Singh, learned counsel for the applicants. Smt. Sharda Dubey, learned P.L.for the respondent No.2. The applicants have filed this revision under Section 115 of CPC being aggrieved by the order dated 14.11.2011 passed by 1st Civil Judge Class-II, Deosar District Singrauli, in Co.No.23-A/2010, whereby their application filed under Section 11 of CPC filed for dismissal of the suit of respondent No.1, on the ground of principle of resjudicata, has been dismissed. In the couRs.of the arguments, on asking the applicants' counsel whether earlier suit filed by the same plaintiffs or their predecessor in title was finally adjudicated, on which the counsel submits that initially such suit was decreed on the basis of compromise of the parties by the trial Court but one of the defendant had challenged such decree before the appellate court and by allowing appeal such compromise decree of the trial Court was set aside and such earlier suit was remitted back to th...
Rambabu Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
W.P.NO.102/2014 08.01.2014. Shri Gopal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, learned Dy. Advocate General for the respondents. Petitioner who was appointed initially as Section Writer has filed this petition claiming regularization in service on the ground that in the cases of other similarly situated employees the State Administrative Tribunal had directed to consider the cases of Section Writer for appointment to the post of L.D.C.in the regular set up against fiRs.available vacant post. It is the case of the petitioner that the decision rendered by the Tribunal in O.A.No.389/1993 (Ram Bahadur Sharma versus State of Madhya Pradesh and otheRs.decided on 13-05-1999 has been implemented in the cases of some employees and therefore petitioner is also entitled to similar benefits. From the record, it is seen that after the order was passed by the Tribunal on 13-05-1999 in the case of Ram Bahadur Sharma (supra) a review application filed by the State Government was re...
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Give ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
1 W.P. No. 21892/2013 8.1.2014 Shri S.K. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Government Advocate for respondent State of Madhya Pradesh. Heard on admission. Petitioner seeks quashment of order dated 13.11.2013 passed by the Additional Director, State Institute of Science Education (SISE). concurred by the Commissioner, Rajya Shiksha Kendra negating the claim of the petitioner for absorption as Senior Lecturer/Assistant Professor in SISE. Initially appointed as Lecturer (Mathematics) in Tribal Welfare Department by order dated 10.2.1992, petitioner was sent on deputation in the same grade and post in School Education Department on 20.12.2000 and was posted in Government Education College, Jabalpur. Petitioner's services as Lecturer were absorbed in the School Education Department by order No. F1534/2001/ 2005 dated 1.8.2001. He was thereafter, by ...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Balveer Singh Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
Cr.R.No.2325/2012 8.1.2014 Shri S.K.Kashyap, G.A for the applicant/State. Heard on admission. The respondent was acquitted from the charges of offences punishable under Section 294, 332, 353 and 506-B of I.P.C vide judgment dated 25.1.2012 passed by the JMFC, Sagar in Criminal Case No.4794/2006. A Criminal Appeal (unregistered) filed by the State against the respondent was dismissed vide order dated 4.9.2012 by the learned FiRs.Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar being barred by limitation. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid judgment and order the State has preferred the present revision. The facts of the case in short are that one Ramdhani Pandey, who was an Assistant Lineman went to the house of respondent Balveer Singh on 18.8.2006 at Village Jyotinagar, Makroniya, District Sagar. He found that the respondent took a direct connection by using a wire from the L.T line and therefore, he removed that connection. The respondent abused him with obscene words and gave a threat. Thereafter, h...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »