Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govind Prasad Jaiswal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
1 W.P.No.22166/2013 15.01.2014 Shri M.K.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Petitioner who was appointed initially as Section Writer in the copying section has filed this petition claiming regularization in service on the ground that in the cases of similarly situated employees, the State Administrative Tribunal had directed to consider the cases of Section Writer for appointment to the post of Lower Division Clerk in the regular set up against fiRs.available vacant post. It is the case of the petitioner that the decision rendered by the Tribunal in O.A.No.389/1993 (Ram Bahadur Sharma versus State of Madhya Pradesh and otheRs.decided on 13.05.1999 has been implemented in the cases of some employees and therefore, petitioner is also entitled to similar benefits. From the record, it is seen that after the order was passed by the Tribunal on 13.5.1999 in the case of Ram Bahadur Sharma (supra) a review application filed by...
Sukhdeo Jadhav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
W.P.No.15741/2012 (Sukhdeo Jadhav versus State of MP and otheRs.15.01.2014 Shri D.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.R.Rao, learned P.L.for the State. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 14.12.2007 whereby a sum of Rs.1,19,286/- is sought to be recovered from the petitioner on account of over spending by the officer's posted at Sehore. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner alone was not responsible for the aforesaid over spending. It is submitted that apart from the above no opportunity of hearing or notice was ever given to the petitioner and only on the basis of audit objections, the recovery is sought to be made which is not permissible in law. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner it is observed that this court by interim order dated 08.10.2012 has stayed the operation of the impugned order dated 14.12.2007 as far as it relates to the petitioner. It is also observed that the ...
Naresh Kumar Agrawal Vs. Abdul Mugheez Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shr ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
M.A.No.3830/2013 15/01/2014 Shri K.L. Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant. Heard on the question of admission. The instance misc. appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of CPC is directed against the order dated 9 th October, 2013 passed in Civil Suit No.864-A/2013 by 16 th Additional District Judge, Bhopal. By the said order application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC filed by the plaintiff/petitioner has been rejected.2. The facts necessary for disposal of the misc. appeal are that as per the plaint allegations, plaintiff/petitioner had claimed to purchase certain parcel of land situated in Ibrahimganj, Tahsil Huzoor, Distt. Bhopal and relevant for disposal of this appeal is land falling in Khasra No.395 ad- measuring area 0.45 acre. Plaintiff/petitioner claimed to be in possession of the suit land and prayed for injunction against the defendant not to interfere with the possession over the suit land.3. Defendant No.2-Municipal Corporation, Bhopal denied the plaint allegations and ...
Harun Akhtar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'b ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
Writ Petition No :: 22055 / 2013 Harun Akhtar and others versus State of MP and others 15.01.2014. Shri N.S.Thakur for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, Government Advocate for the respondents/State on advance notice. It is the case of the petitioners that according to the provisions of M.P.Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale of Shiksha Karmi but as their claim for grant of regular pay scale is not being considered, this writ petition is filed. It is stated that in identical situation, the Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.602/2010(S) has decided the matter and in the aforesaid case namely Mohanlal & others versus State of M.P.& otheRs.the petition was disposed of vide order dated 22/01/2010 and certain directions were issued. The order passed in the case of Mohanlal (supra) reads as under:- Accordingly, without commenting upon the merits of the matter, I am inclined to dispose of this p...
Dr. Neena v Patel Vs. Smt. Jyotsnaben P Patel Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.2255/2013 Dr. Neena V. Patel Vs. Smt. Jyotsnaben P. Patel & others & WRIT PETITION No.16527/2012 Dr. Neena V. Patel Vs. Smt. Jyotsnaben P. Patel & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri Pravin Samdani, learned senior Counsel assisted by Shri Kunal Vajani, Shri Pranaya Goel, Shri Karl Tamboly and Shri Priyankush Jain, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Agrawal, learned Counsel for respondent No.1. ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (15/01/2014) Both the writ petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. However, for the purposes of this order, facts are taken from W.P. No.2255/2013.2. These writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are directed against the order dated 19.10.2012 passed in Probate Ca...
Smt. Preeti Janghela Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given B ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
1 Writ Petition No.21190/2013 Writ Petition No.21190/2013 15.01.2014 Shri Rahul Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms.Vandana Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for State of Madhya Pradesh on advance notice. Heard on admission. Petitioner, an Assistant Teacher (Science).Government Higher Secondary School, Begarwani, District Seoni seeks quashment of the communication dated 31.05.2013; whereby, the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Seoni in response to Collector's Jansunwai application No.66488 dated 28.05.2013 and In-charge Officer's letter No.1165/ Jansunwai/ Jila Panchayat/13, Seoni dated 28.05.2013 has recommended the cancellation of the no-objection granted by Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Development, Seoni for inter-Panchayat absorption of the petitioner being issued in contravention to the stipulation contained in Commissioner, Tribal Development's letter No.4/ 2012/ 12455 dated 21.06.2012 that before giving no-objection for inter-District/ intra-District absor...
Santosh Arya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'b ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
1 W.P.No.291/2014. 15/1/2014. Shri Jitendra Arya, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State on advance notice. Default pointed out by the office of payment of Court fees has been made good on 15.1.2014. It is the case of the petitioners that according to the provisions of M.P.Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale of Shiksha Karmi but as their claim for grant of regular pay scale is not being considered, this writ petition is filed. It is stated that in identical situation, the Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.602/2010(S) has decided the matter and in the aforesaid case namely Mohanlal & others versus State of M.P.& otheRs.the petition was disposed of vide order dated 22/01/2010 and certain directions were issued. The order passed in the case of Monahlal (supra) reads as under:- Accordingly, without commenting upon the merits of the mat...
Lalloo Ahirwal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
M.Cr.C.No.16535 of 2013 15.01.2014 Shri Y.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Santosh Yadav, learned PL for respondent-State. On behalf of the applicant, this petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail as he is under apprehension of his arrest in connection of Crime No.175/13, registered at Police Station Jabera, district Damoh for the offence of Section 34 (2) of Excise Act. On receiving information that applicant is in possession of unlicenced foreign liquor at the alleged place, Police reached to the spot where he was found with unlicenced 468 quarters foreign liquor in ten cartoons but the applicant flade away from the spot. The aforesaid liquor 84.240 litres in quantity was seized and on available information, the offence was registered against the applicant. The applicant's counsel submits that the applicant was never remained involved in unlicenced liquor business and such substance was neither collected by him nor the same was seiz...
Mathura Prasad Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given B ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
Writ Petition No :: 9973 / 2013 Mathura Prasad Yadav versus State of MP and others 15.01.2014. Shri Dinesh Upadhyaya for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents 1 to 4. Shri Shahid Baig for respondent No.5. Challenging the order passed by respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 in the matter of directing registration of a criminal case against the petitioner under section 420 IPC, petitioner has filed this writ petition. Petitioner and respondent No.5 are real brotheRs.Respondent No.5 in a pending revenue case filed an application before Tehsildar, Majhouli in which it was indicated that certain fraud has been committed in the matter of preparation of a rin-pustika and by playing fraud, certain entries have been made in the rin-pustika. The learned Tehsildar directed for registration of FiRs.Information Report (FIR) and inquiry into the allegation of fraud by the police authorities. Interalia contending that no fraud has been committed, applicant filed an appeal bef...
Dilip Kapse Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'bl ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.M.Cr.C.No.5795/2007 Dilip Kapse VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh and another --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri P.N.Dubey, counsel for the applicant. Shri S.D.Khan, G.A. for the State/respondent No.1. None for the respondent No.2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 15th day of January, 2014) The applicant has preferred the present petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to get the proceedings of the criminal case No.982/2007 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Harda to be quashed.2. The facts of the case, in short, are that, the respondent No.2 had lodged a criminal complaint against four persons including the applicant, who at that time was working as Food Officer at Harda. Harda was affected by flood and the Government provided 1500 quintals wheat in August, 2004 to distri...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »