Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Rameshwar Dubey Judgement Given By: Ho ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
CRR No.1512/2012 Criminal Revision No.1512/2012 16.1.2014 Shri S.K.Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the State/applicant. Heard on admission. The respondents were convicted for the offence punishable under section 325 read with section 34 34 of IPC and sentenced for one year's rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- vide judgment dated 28.9.2011 passed by the learned JMFC, Sehore in criminal case No.617/2008. In criminal appeal No.251/2011, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sehore vide judgment dated 13.6.2012 maintained the conviction but, reduced the sentence till rising the Court with fine of Rs.2,000/-. The facts of the case, in short, are that, on 23.6.2008, a quarrel took place between the victim Omprakash and the respondents. Quarrel took place due to a dispute of property and it is alleged that the respondents assaulted the victim by sticks, causing a fracture in his arm. After considering the submissions made by the learned G.A.for the State, it appears that the respon...
Vicky @ Vivek Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.K.Gupta,J.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1996 OF2013Vicky @ Vivek. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Pushpendra Dubey, Advocate for the appellant. Shri S.D.Khan, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (ORAL) (16/1/2014) The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC vide judgment dated 30.7.2013 passed by the 11th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in ST No.240/2013 and sentenced with five years' RI with fine of Rs.1,000/-.2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 5.7.2012 when the complainant Smt. Shashi Panchratan went to New Market Bhopal for some purchasing, then near Kamla Nehru School, Bhopal the appellant came on a bike from the backside and snatched a golden chain of the comp...
Jagdish Sharan Tiwari Vs. Secretary Public Work Department the State o ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
Jagdish Sharan Tiwari & ORS.versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.643 / 2014 16.1.2014: Shri Anoop Saxema, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Devashish Sakalkar, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. Matter pertains to grant of leave encashment to the petitioners after their retirement. The question of leave encashment have already been considered and decided by a Division Bench of this Court vide Annexure P-2 in W.A.No.754/2010 (State of M.P.& ORS.versus Subhash Pandey & Ors.) and it is found that the employees are entitled to 120 days leave encashment. The findings recorded by the Division Bench in the matter reads as under : However, in view of the order passed in Sewakram Bhede (supra) learned Single Judge has rightly directed the appellants to grant the benefits of leave encashment of 240 days earned leaves. We have considered the submission made by learned counsel for the appellants. From perusal of the grounds mentioned in clause (b) of memorandum of the appeal filed by...
Smt. Rita Semual Vs. B.K. Kurmi Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justi ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
1 Cr.R No.1464 of 2012 16.01.2014 Shri R.L.Shukla, counsel for the applicant. Shri M.Safiqulla, counsel for the respondent. The applicant/ accused has filed this revision under section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C being aggrieved by the order dated 23.6.12 passed by the JMFC, Jabalpur in complain case No.18635/07 filed by the respondent to prosecute the applicant under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act on the strength of some cheque whereby application of the respondent under section 65 of the Evidence Act permitting him to adduce the secondary evidence with respect of the original cheque and other documents, has been allowed.2. Applicant's counsel after taking me through the averments of the revision memo as well as the papers placed on the record along with the impugned order so also by referring some papers from his file argued that the impugned complaint was filed initially by respondent without annexing the original cheque and some documents through some counsel but at the sta...
Madhu Jeniyani Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
1 SA No.908 of 2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ; JABALPUR S.A.No.908 of 2012 Madhu Janiyani Vs. State of M.P For the Appellant : Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Himanshu Mishra Advocate. For the Respondent : Smt Sharda Dubey, PL. ORDER (16 /01 /2014 ) Hon. U.C.Maheshwari J.This Appeal is directed by the appellant/plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 18.5.12 passed by the Addl. District Judge to the Court of Ist Addl.District Judge, Bhopal in Regular Civil Appeal No.76-A/11 affirming the judgment and decree dated 04.02.11 passed by XII Civil Judge Class-I Bhopal in Civil Original Suit No.149-A/09 dismissing her suit filed against the respondent/authority for declaration and perpetual injunction with respect of the land bearing survey No.234/2 area 0.27 acer situated at village Laukhedi, Tehsil Huzur, District Bhopal.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal in short are that the appellant herein filed a suit against the respondent contending th...
Akil @ Aslam @ Akil Khan Vs. the State of M.P. Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
1 Criminal Appeal No.953/1996 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.953/1996 Akil @ Aslam @ Akil Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri P. N. Das, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri S. D. Khan, Government Advocate. ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 16th day of January, 2014) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 1.5.1996 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Seoni in ST. No.68 of 1994 whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 of I.P.C and sentenced for 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/-. In default of payment of fine, he was to undergo for six month's rigorous imprisonment.2. Prose...
Satish Kumar Agrawal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given B ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
W.P.No.18012/2012 Satish Kumar Agrawal versus State of MP & ORS.16/01/2014 Shri G.S.Uddey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Pandey, learned Panel Lawyer for Respondent No.1. Shri Vivek Rusia, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4. Seeking compassionate appointment in the establishment of M.P.Power Generating Company, Jabalpur after death of his brother, petitioner has filed this writ petition. Petitioner's brother Late Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal was working as an Assistant Grade-III in the establishment of M.P.State Electricity Board and he died in harness on 24.10.1993 as is evident from Annexure-P1. It is stated that the petitioner moved an application for grant of compassionate appointment and when the same was not considered, this writ petition has been filed. Placing reliance in a scheme Annexure-P5 issued by the State Government and pointing out that the petitioner is entitled to compassionate appointment, his case is not considered in accordance with the requir...
Maksood Ahmad (Rui Wale) Vs. Smt. Sharifunnisha (D) Through Lr's: Maks ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Second Appeal No.347/2013 Appellant Maksood Ahmad, (Rui wale). Vs. Respondents Smt. Sharifunnisha and others. Shri Tawrej Khan : Counsel for the appellant. ORDER /01/2014 U.C. MAHESHWARI, J.1. The appellant -defendant has filed this appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 16.2.2013, passed by 15th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Regular Appeal No.4-A/11, whereby allowing the appeal of the respondents - plaintiffs by setting aside judgment dated 25.7.2011, passed by 4th Civil Judge, Class -I, Jabalpur in Civil Original Suit No.101-A/09, dismissing the suit of the respondents filed for eviction on the grounds of Sections 12 (1) (a) and 12 (1) (f) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act 1961, in short "The Act", such suit of the respondents has been decreed on aforesaid both the grounds against the appellant.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal in short are that t...
Nandu Alias Anand Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.1496/2012 Nandu @ Anand VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri M.Shafiqullah, counsel for the appellant. Shri Akshay Namdeo, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 16th day of January, 2014) The appellant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 12.11.2010 passed by the learned Special Judge under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act (in short 'NDPS Act'), Shahdol in special case No.22/2008, whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under section 20 (b) (ii) (B) of NDPS Act and sentenced for 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.50,000/-. In default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for 6 months.2. The prosecution's case, in short, is...
Rakesh Kumar JaIn Vs. Smt. Kiran Tamrakar Judgement Given By: Hon'ble ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
W.P. No.20941/2013 16/01/2014 Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. By this petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the order dated 18/11/2013 passed in Civil Suit No.5-A/2012 by 9 th Civil Judge Class-2, Sagar has been questioned.2. The facts necessary for disposal of this writ petition are that plaintiff/respondent- Smt.Kiran Tamrakar has filed a suit for eviction and arrears of rent against defendant/ petitioner on 4/7/2011. On 9/5/2012 plaintiff closed evidence and the case was fixed for defendant's evidence. The case was adjourned for following dates i.e. 10/12/2012, 5/3/2013, 2/4/2013, 30/4/2013 and 14/5/2012. On such dates the defendant was directed to keep his witnesses present for evidence, failing which his right to lead evidence shall be closed, however, each time Court has adopted a lenient view to accommodate the defendant/petitioner to lead evidence keeping in mind the ends of justice.3. On 17/6/2013...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »