Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahendra Kumar Mahajan Vs. Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.18207/2012 MAHENDRA KUMAR MAHAJAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18208/2012 ALOK KUMAR SAKALLEY VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18209/2012 KU. REKHA RANI BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18210/2012 SMT. SUSHMA BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18211/2012 KU. KAMALJEET CHABRA VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18258/2012 SMT. ANJU TYAGI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER2W.P. No.18273/2012 ASHFAQUE AHMED KHAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18287/2012 ASHOK WANHERE VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER Present: Honble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.& Hon'ble Shri Anil Sharma, J.Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri S. P. Dubey, learned counsel for respondent No.1. _________________________________________________ As per : Hon'ble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.ORDER ( 1712014 ) As c...
Chandra Shekhar Vs. Secretary School Education the State of Madhya Pra ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 W.P.No.570/2014 W.P.No.570/2014 17.01.2014 Shri A.K.Rawat, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Ms.V.Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State. Petitioners initially appointed as Shiksha Karmis under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998. Subsequently, being absorbed as Sahayak Adhyapaks in pursuance to the Madhya Pradesh Adhyapak Samvarg (Employment and Conditions of service) Rules 2008 and granted regular pay-scale with effect from 01.04.2007 seeks direction to the respondents to grant regular pay-scale from the date of their initial appointment as Shiksha Karmi. During the couRs.of submission, it is being stated by learned counsel for petitioners that similarly situated persons have approached this Court vide writ petition No.602/2010(s) : Mohanlal and ors.v.State of Madhya Pradesh decided on 22.01.2010 & writ petition No.4720/2013 : Jitendra Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh and these petitions were ...
Hallu Kumhar Vs. Secretary Ministry of Panchayat Social Welfare the St ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
Writ Petition No :: 625 / 2014 Hallu Kumhar and others versus State of MP and others 17.01.2014. Shri S.K.Raghuwanshi, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri A. Pandey, PL, for the Respondents/State. Claiming similar benefit as has been granted to employees by virtue of the order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Gopal Chawala and others versus State of MP and others in Writ Appeal No.596/2010 on 15.12.2010, petitioners have filed this writ petition. In the case of Gopal Chawla (Supra).taking note of the principle of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work', respondents were directed to examine the case of Gurujis and consider the claim at par with that of Shiksha Karmi. The direction was issued to scrutinize the case of Gurujis and they were directed to pass appropriate orders in this regard within a period of six months. Even though, this Court in various cases has directed the State Government to take action in the light of the directions issued in the case of Gopal Chawla (Supra)...
M.P.State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Pal Singh Judgement Given By: ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
W.P.NO.14362/2012 16/01//2014 None appears for the petitioner. Shri Amit Pandey, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Seeking a direction from this court to the respondents to appoint the petitioner as a Guest Teacher in the institute in question mainly on the ground that the petitioner was appointed as Guest Teacher for the academic session 2011-12 and there are directions by the Commissioner, School education for continuing the guest teacher for the academic session 2012-13, the petitioner has filed this petition contending that he has not been continued in view of the directions of the Commissioner, School Education. The respondents have filed return and points out and even though there is a direction for continuing such guest teachers who are appointed but direction is to examine the performance of the teachers for the previous year and to grant them appointment, if they are found eligible. It is indicated in para-2 onwards with regard to the petitioner that for the academic y...
Smt. Meena Rai Vs. Sudarshan Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 Second Appeal No. 715/2013 17.1.2014 Shri Pranay Verma, learned counsel for the appellant. Heard on admission. This second appeal at the instance of plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15.5.2013 passed in Civil Aoppeal No. 47A/2013 by Additional District Judge, Hatta, Damoh, affirming the judgment and decree dated 8.9.2011 passed in Civil Suit No. aA/2011 by Civil Judge Class II, Hatta. On the strength of Ikrarnama (Vikraypatra) (Ex. P/1) dated 1.8.2007 and Form 29 and 30 (Ex. P3 and P4); notice of transfer of ownership of Motor Vehicle and application for intimation and transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle, respectively, said to be executed by defendant, plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of ownership of Tempo Trax bearing registration No. MP 35D0131 and MP 34 D0089 and Motor Cycle Hero Honda bearing registration No. MP 34 MA0493. Defenda...
Mahesh Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 M.C.C. No. 736 Of 2013 17.1.2014 Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for applicant. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Government Advocate for respondent State of M.P. on advance notice. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Applicant/plaintiff seeks transfer of Civil Suit No. 27 A/2012 pending in the Court of Civil Judge Class II, Badamalehra, district Chhatarpur to a competent court in nearby district, viz., Panna or Satna. Suit is for relief of permanent injunction to the effect that the petitioner be not dispossessed except by following due process of law from the land bearing survey No. 407/3/1 Area 2.181 hectare. The plaint contention are that the suit property is in possession of plaintiff through his ancestors since long; whereon he is in settled possession having constructed a house, well and tubewell and is cultivating the same being in settled possession. It is conte...
P.S. Construction Company 1901, Rampur Chhapar Jabalpur Vs. the State ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
Writ Petition No.16008 / 2013 (P.S.Construction Co., Jabalpur ...Vs..State of M.P.& otheRs.17-01-2014 Shri S.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the respondent/authorities are proceeding to deduct royalty from the mineral which is used by him as a contractor for construction purposes. By relying a decision of this Court rendered in W.P.No.17083/2010, decided on 7-12-2010 the petitioner submits that similar directions be issued in the present case also. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing the record it is observed that in view of the Madhya Pradesh Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2006, the petitioner is required to purchase mineral from a person holding a mining lease or quarry or a person who has been given licence for storing mineral under the said provisions. The Rules of 2006 also provide that in the absence ...
Umesh Kumar Namdeo Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
Umesh Kumar Namdeo & ORS.versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.470 / 2014 16.1.2014: Shri K.S.Rajput, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Devashish Sakalkar, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. It is stated in the petition that in terms of the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998, the petitioners would be entitled to grant of regular pay scale of the post of Shiksha Karmi. However, such a claim is not being considered, therefore, this writ petition is required to be filed. It is further stated that identical claim was made before the Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.602/2010 (S) by certain teachers of the similar category namely Mohanlal & others and the said writ petition has been disposed of vide order dated 22.01.2010 directing consideration of the claim of the persons like petitioners and, therefore, similar treatment may be given to the petitioneRs.This Court in the case of Mohanlal (supra) ha...
Brijesh Kumar Namdeo Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgeme ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
Brijesh Kumar Namdeo & ORS.versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.658 / 2014 16.1.2014: Shri Ajeet Kumar Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Devashish Sakalkar, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. It is stated in the petition that in terms of the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998, the petitioners would be entitled to grant of regular pay scale of the post of Shiksha Karmi. However, such a claim is not being considered, therefore, this writ petition is required to be filed. It is further stated that identical claim was made before the Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.602/2010 (S) by certain teachers of the similar category namely Mohanlal & others and the said writ petition has been disposed of vide order dated 22.01.2010 directing consideration of the claim of the persons like petitioners and, therefore, similar treatment may be given to the petitioneRs.This Court in the case of Mohanlal (...
Peeru Vs. Happo Bai Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Ya ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
1 W.P.No.5981/2012 W.P.No.5981/2012 16.01.2014 Shri Sanjay Sarwate, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri Sameer Seth, learned counsel for respondent No.1. With consent of learned counsel for the parties the petition is heard finally. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India at the instance of defendant, is directed against order dated 27.02.2012 passed in civil suit No.23-A/2011 by FiRs.Civil Judge, Class-II, Khandwa; whereby, application preferred by the petitioners-defendants No.1 and 2 under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Order 8 Rule 6-A(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking amendment and to put counter claim has been rejected. Suit at the instance of respondent No.1/plaintiff is for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of property which find mention in Annexure-A appended with suit plaint on the ground that the same has been gifted in favour of plaintiff by her mother-Munna Bai vide Will dated 13.10.1988. The petitioners-defendants filed the wr...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »