Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Gaytri Vidyapeeth Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
W.P.No.14061/2013 17/01/2014 Shri B.P.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is heard finally. The petitioner-Shri Gayatri Vidyapeeth Siksha Samiti is a registered society under the provisions of M.P.Societies Registration Act, 1973 with Registration No.24324 dated 7/6/1990. The society runs educational institution in District Umariya and District Rewa. The petitioner-society had applied for permanent lease for the area ad-measuring 100 ft x 100 ft = 10,000 sq.ft. Out of KhaSr.No.1507/1A/1 area 3.186 hectare situated in Village Chhatan Camp General No.45, Patwari Circle No.48, Umariya, Tahsil Bandhavgarh, Distt. Umariya (MP) vide application dated 20 th March, 2003. After processing the petitioner's application, ultimately a favourable report was submitted by the Collector to the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Bhopal vide letter dated 24/6...
Roopram Kaurav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Appeal No.154/2009 Roopram Kaurav....Appellant Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.Respondents For the appellants : Shri Ashish Pathak, Advocate. For the respondents : Shri Rahul Kumar Jain, Government Advocate. ****** Present: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE VIMLA JAIN ****** JUDGMENT (17.1.2014) The following judgment of the Court was delivered by : Ajit Singh, J. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 4.12.2008, Annexure A1, passed by the learned Single Judge of this High Court whereby he has dismissed the appellants Writ Petition No.14307/2003. 2. The appellant was working on the post of police constable. He was served with a charge sheet that on 10.11.1998 at about 10:35 p.m.he, after consuming alcohol in a drunken state, created a terror in public at Jhanda Chowk, Tahsil Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur. The appellant, in reply, denied the charge and stated that he had been falsely implicat...
Ashfaque Ahmed Khan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.18207/2012 MAHENDRA KUMAR MAHAJAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18208/2012 ALOK KUMAR SAKALLEY VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18209/2012 KU. REKHA RANI BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18210/2012 SMT. SUSHMA BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18211/2012 KU. KAMALJEET CHABRA VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18258/2012 SMT. ANJU TYAGI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER2W.P. No.18273/2012 ASHFAQUE AHMED KHAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18287/2012 ASHOK WANHERE VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER Present: Honble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.& Hon'ble Shri Anil Sharma, J.Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri S. P. Dubey, learned counsel for respondent No.1. _________________________________________________ As per : Hon'ble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.ORDER ( 1712014 ) As c...
Ashok Wanhere Vs. Deve Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.18207/2012 MAHENDRA KUMAR MAHAJAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18208/2012 ALOK KUMAR SAKALLEY VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18209/2012 KU. REKHA RANI BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18210/2012 SMT. SUSHMA BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18211/2012 KU. KAMALJEET CHABRA VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18258/2012 SMT. ANJU TYAGI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER2W.P. No.18273/2012 ASHFAQUE AHMED KHAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18287/2012 ASHOK WANHERE VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER Present: Honble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.& Hon'ble Shri Anil Sharma, J.Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri S. P. Dubey, learned counsel for respondent No.1. _________________________________________________ As per : Hon'ble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.ORDER ( 1712014 ) As c...
Smt. Shailja Singh Vs. Principal Secretary School Education Deptt. the ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
Writ Petition No :: 802 / 2014 Smt. Shailja Singh versus State of MP and others 14.11.2011. Shri Subodh Kathar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, Dy. Advocate General, on advance notice for respondent/State. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the controveRs.involved in this case is covered by the judgment of Apex Court in Asha Saxena versus State of M.P.& OtheRs.S.L.P.(Civil) No.18881/06 and this case may be decided in the light of aforesaid judgment. The Apex Court, in Asha Saxena (Supra) considering the controveRs.involved, held thus :- The appellant herein was appointed as a Lecturer in the Government Girls' Higher Secondary School, Mama Ka Bazar, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, on 19.9.1981. Prior to entry into service, the appellant had in 1972 acquired B.Ed Degree. According to the appellant, at the time of entry into service she was entitled to two advance increments in accordance with a Circular issued by the State Government on 21.9.1974, which reads as follow...
Ku. Kamalijeet Chhabra Vs. Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.18207/2012 MAHENDRA KUMAR MAHAJAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18208/2012 ALOK KUMAR SAKALLEY VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18209/2012 KU. REKHA RANI BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18210/2012 SMT. SUSHMA BATHRI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18211/2012 KU. KAMALJEET CHABRA VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18258/2012 SMT. ANJU TYAGI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER2W.P. No.18273/2012 ASHFAQUE AHMED KHAN VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER W.P. No.18287/2012 ASHOK WANHERE VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA & ANOTHER Present: Honble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.& Hon'ble Shri Anil Sharma, J.Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri S. P. Dubey, learned counsel for respondent No.1. _________________________________________________ As per : Hon'ble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.ORDER ( 1712014 ) As c...
Satyendra Kumar Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given B ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
W.P.No.13263/2013 (S.K.Soni versus State of MP and otheRs.17.01.2014 Heard Shri Pradeep Batra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.and Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State on advance copy, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner is not being permitted to participate in the counselling being conducted for making appointments on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak, Grade-III though the petitioner is over qualified having obtained a B.Ed. degree. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after a perusal of the petition, it is observed on a statement to that effect being made by the learned counsel for the State, that similar petitions wherein the petitioners had raised the same issue, have been dismissed by this Court with observations in the case of Sanyogita Thakur and others v. State of M.P.and otheRs.reported in 2013 (2) MPLJ206and without any observations in W.P.No.6129/2013 (...
Vanshapati Vs. Smt. Saraswati Devi Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Ju ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1 W.P.No.15315/2013 17/1/2014. Shri P.K.Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the fact that inspite of notice being issued to the respondent by Registered Post none is appearing, deeming the respondents to have been served and taking note of the short controveRs.involved in this writ petition, this petition is disposed of with the following directions :- Petitioner's right to examine the witnesses have been closed on the ground that the witness were not present for examination inspite of opportunity being granted. petitioner being plaintiff if the right of the petitioner to examine the witnesses are closed it may cause serious prejudice to the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid, in the interest of justice one more opportunity is granted to the petitioner to keep the witnesses present. Accordingly the following directions are issued:- On the petitioner filing a certified copy of this order and an application along with affidavits of the witnesses under Order 18 ...
Aakash Panjwani Vs. Ashok Chandwani Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri J ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
M.Cr.C.No :: 13598 / 2013 Aakash Panjwani versus Ashok Chandwani 17.01.2014. Shri Parag Chaturvedi for the petitioner. This application has been filed under section 482 CrPC seeking a direction for quashing Complaint Case No.475/2012 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate FiRs.Class, Jabalpur under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as Act).It is the case of the petitioner that a complaint was filed by the respondent under section 138 of the Act, and based on the complaint a bailable warrant Annexure A/1 was issued against the petitioner. It is stated that from the copy of the complaint and the documents annexed thereto, which is filed as Annexures A/2 and A/3 onwards, the petitioner has got nothing to do with the complaint and by contending that the petitioner is being falsely implicated in the complaint case, this application has been filed. It is stated that the petitioner did not have any transactions with the respondent and has not issued ...
Surendra @ Surender Kumar Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgem ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
Criminal Appeal No.1757/2012 17.01.2014 Shri V.K.Tyagi, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Santosh Yadav, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent- State. Heard on IA No.26632/13, appellant's second repeat bail application for suspension of his remaining jail sentence and grant of bail as he has been convicted under Sections 354, 376 and 506 (B) of IPC for RI one year with fine of Rs.500, for RI ten years with fine of Rs.2000 and for RI one year with fine of Rs.500 respectively in such Sections. His earlier application was dismissed as withdrawn by extending a liberty to revive the prayer after six months by the Coordinate Bench of this court. Subsequent to passing this order, the Hon'ble Judge has demitted the office hence this matter is listed before me. The appellant's counsel after taking me through the depositions of the witnesses, specifically the deposition of the prosecutrix said that she has not stated any specific fact regarding penetration in the alleged act. In continua...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »