Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
idris Vs. Mubarik Dead Th:legal Heirs Rubina Judgement Given By: Hon'b ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
1 W.P. No. 19499 Of 2012 21.1.2014 Shri Sameer Seth, learned counsel with Shri Ranjit Singh, learned counsel for petitioner. Heard on admission. Order dated 25.1.2012 passed in Civil Suit No. 2A/2011 by FiRs. civil Judge Class II, Khandwa to the extent it rejects plaintiff's (petitioner herein)application under Order 7 Rule 14, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is being assailed vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Suit at the instance of the petitioner/plaintiff is for eviction and permanent injunction in respect of the agricultural land bearing KhaSr. No. 192/2 area 2.66 acre. Petitioner/ plaintiff after framing of issue set out the matter for evidence, when the plaintiff as also defendant filed certain applications. Since the present case is against an order regarding rejecting of application under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC, orders on other applications are not gone into. That, vi...
Smt. Meera Bai Vs. Bal Kishan Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
SA2442012 21-1-2014 Heard Shri A.K.Jain,learned counsel for the appellant. The appellants/plaintiffs have this appeal being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 20.1.2012 passed by the FiRs.Additional District Judge, Narsinghpur in Civil Appeal No.18-A/2011 affirming and confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.8.2011 passed by the VIth Civil Judge Class-II, Narsinghpur in Civil Suit No.5-A/2008. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellants/plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of Patwari Halka No.17, KhaSr.No.303/1, area 1.465 hectares of village Kareli District Narsinghpur, on the ground that the land in question had been given to them by their Aunt Smt. Sulochana vide registered Will dated 17.4.2007 executed in their favour prior to her death on 18.6.2007. It was alleged that the land in question initially belonged to Bhagwat Singh and after his death the land was recorded in the name of his wife Smt. ...
Rajeev Shrivastava Vs. Principal Secretary School Education Deptt. the ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
1 Writ Petition No.825/2014 Writ Petition No.825/2014 20.01.2014 Shri S.S.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Seth, Panel Lawyer for respondents on advance notice. Heard. The petitioner vide this petition seeks following relief : "(i) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to declare result of the petitioner and allow the petitioner to appear in the next counselling. (ii) The Hon'ble Court may also be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to make available all the records pertaining to the online examination conducted at B.T.R.T Engineering College Sironja, Sagar on 08.09.2013, to verify the candidature of the petitioner." However, substantive claim of the petitioner is against non-consideration of his candidature for appointment to the post of Area Education Officer, the recruitment whereof taken recouRs.to vide advertisement dated 22.08.2013. Initially appointed as Samvida Shala Shishak Grade-II i...
Rt.Rev. Dr. P.C. Singh (Prem Chand Singh) Vs. Mrs. Cheyl Ann Collaco J ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE T.K.KAUSHAL MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL CASE NO.10636 OF2013PETITIONER: Rt. Rev. Dr. P.C. Singh (Prem Chand Singh) S/o late D. Singh, aged about 49 years, Bishop, Jabalpur Diocese, Church of North India, R/0 1231, Napier Town, Jabalpur (M.P.) Vs. RESPONDENTS:1. Mrs. Cheryl Ann Collaco W/o Shri B.M. Collaco, aged about 51 years, R/o 53, Denning Road, South Civil Lines, Jabalpur.2. The State of M.P., through Station House Officer, Mahila Thana, District Jabalpur, M.P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT : For Petitioner : Shri Surendra Singh, Senior Advocate with Shri Anshuman Singh, Advocate. For respondent no.1.: Shri Praveen Dubey, Advocate. For respondent no.2: Shri Akhilendra Singh, Govt. Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (ORDER) Date of hearing:13. 1/2...
M/s Narendra Singh Yadav Vs. Mining Department the State of Madhya Pra ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
Writ Petition No :: 852 / 2014 M/s Narendra Singh Yadav versus State of MP and others 20.01.2014. Shri R.K.Kesharwani for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, Dy. Advocate General, for the State. Petitioner, who is a contractor, has filed this writ petition being aggrieved by the action of the respondents in proposing to recover from the petitioner the royalty charges for the minor minerals consumed by the petitioner in execution of the contract. The question involved in the matter has already been considered and decided by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.21793/2012 (M/s Surinder Singh Kalra versus Union of India and another).vide order passed on 16.12.2013. Taking note of the facts, the Division Bench has observed as under: 10- The question of insisting upon the payment of royalty and the question of deducting royalty from the bills on similar contract has already been considered and decided by this court in various judgments. The question of demanding royalty from a co...
Devashish Verma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Ho ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
1 W.P.No.20287/2013 Devashish Verma versus State of M.P.& ORS.20.01.2014 Shri Sharasd Singh Baghel, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. The only relief prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner is for a direction to the respondent no.2 Collector to consider and decide Civil Case No.14/2012-13 filed before him by the petitioner on 25.9.2013 against the appointment of respondent no.7. It is submitted that the respondent no.2 Collector, Satna be directed to immediately decide the petitioner's aforesaid Civil Case. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that there is nothing on record to indicate that the Collector has deliberately delayed the matter and is not hearing the same. On a query being made, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that notices have been issued to the respondents by the Collector but the respondent no.7 has not entered appearance and on that count the matter has been adjo...
Abdul Hannan Ansari Vs. Union of India Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shr ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
....1 W.P.No.20247 of 2013 Abdul Hannan Ansari Union of India & ORS.20.01.2014 Shri Priyankush Jain, Counsel for the petitioner. This petition is directed against an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur in O.A.No.523 of 2011 by which the original application preferred by the petitioner was dismissed by the Tribunal. The application form of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Locomotive Pilot was rejected on the ground that the petitioner had not enclosed vision certificate along with the application which was the requirement in the advertisement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the aforesaid vision certificate was not enclosed along with the application which was filed in the month of September,2007, but the respondents had called the petitioner for examination in October, 2008 and in July,2009 and in October,2009 for aptitude test and thereafter had rejected the application merely on the ground that the petitioner ...
Bhoora Singh Pippal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
M.Cr.C.No.17424/13 20.01.2014 Shri R.N.Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Santosh Yadav, learned P.L.for the State. State counsel submits that he is under receipt of the case diary. As the case diary is available with the P.L., hence the matter is taken up for hearing on merits. On behalf of the applicant/accused, this petition is preferred under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, as he is under apprehension of his arrest in connection of Crime No.898/13, registered at Police Station Garha, Jabalpur against him and some other co-accused for the offence of Sections 419 and 420 of I.P.C.and of Section 3/4 of Madhya Pradesh Pariksha Adhiniyam 1982. As per case of the prosecution, on dated 14.12.2013, a report in writing with the signature of the Dean, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College Jabalpur, was received in the Office of Station House Officer, Police Station Garha Jabalpur, through some Assistant Lecturer. On the basis of such ...
M.S. Pataskar Vs. Principal Secretary Housing and Environment Departme ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
W.P.No.944/2014 M.S.Pataskar versus State of MP and others 20.01.2014 Heard Shri A.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manoj Kushwaha, learned P.L.for the State on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner who is a work charged contingency paid employee has filed this petition claiming leave encashment of 240 days after his superannuation from service. The claim of the petitioner is based on similar orders passed in various writ petitions by this court wherein leave encashment of 240 days has been granted by this court. It is however, pointed out by the learned Government advocate appearing for the State that in one of the cases the matter was taken before the Division Bench of this court and the Division Bench by order dated 15.12.2010 passed in W.A.No.753/10 has partly modified the order passed by this court on the statement of the learned Government Advocate for the State that the petitioner is entitled to only 120 days leave encashment as per rul...
Dirgaj Singh Vs. Secretary School Education Department the State of Ma ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
W.P.No.924/2014 Dirgaj Singh versus State of MP & ORS.20/01/2014 Shri Kailash Dev Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, learned Dy. Advocate General, on advance notice for respondents/State. Petitioner is challenging an action of the respondents in denying the benefit of second kramonnati and proposing to make recovery of benefit already granted after retirement from service, the question involved in this petition already decided by a Bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna W/o. Shri Promod Koranne versus State of M.P.and OtheRs.in W.P.No.6773/06, decided on 26/04/2007, and subsequently followed by this Court in series of cases, one such order being passed in W.P.No.5756/08(s).Shri R.C.Chaurasiya & Others versus State of M.P.& OtheRs.decided on 26/05/2008. In the case of Smt. Prerna (Supra) the directions given is as under : 17. Consequently these petitions are allowed. The petitioners are entitled to derive the benefit of second Kramonnati according to the...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »