Madhya Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prem Bai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble S ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
M.Cr.C.No.17169 of 2013 21.01.2014 Shri L.C.Chourasia, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Akhilendra Singh, learned Govt. Adv.for respondent-State. State's counsel submits that he is under receipt of the case diary. Heard. On behalf of the applicants, this petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail as they are under apprehension of their arrest in connection of Crime No.554/12, registered against them at Police Station Kotwali, district Tikamgarh for the offence of Sections 147, 148, 149, 294, 506, 323, 353, 332 and 427 of IPC. As appeared from the impugned order of Sessions Court that on filing the charge sheet Section 333 of IPC has also been involved. The applicants' counsel after taking me through the impugned order and the papers placed on record argued that some peaceful agitation was being carried out by public at large against removal of some alleged encroachment in the town, the applicants were present on the spot but any of them has nei...
Smt. Shakuntala Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
1 W.P.No.16259/2013 Smt. Shakuntala Patel versus State of M.P.& ORS.21.01.2014 Shri Prashant Shrivas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondent nos.5 and 6 to take action for appointment of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has applied for appointment on the post of Prerak in which the petitioner has not been given 20 marks for experience. It is submitted that the petitioner had previously approached this Court by filing W.P No.7469/2012 in which orders in favour of the petitioner were issued pursuant to which the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Katni has also issued orders on 2.8.2013, Annexure P-11, but the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Badwara is not reformulating the select list after awarding marks to the petitioner. It is submitted that in such circumstances the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ba...
Anil Tiwri @ Banti Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
M.Cr.C.No.16350/2013 M.Cr.C.No.16350/2013 21.1.2014 Shri Priyank Choubey, counsel for the applicants. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent No.1. Heard on admission. The applicants have preferred the present petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C.to quash the proceedings of criminal case No.590/2012 registered before the JMFC, Silwani for offence punishable under section 498-A, 323, 506/34 of IPC and section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is apparent that the appellant took an objection of jurisdiction that the entire incident took place at the house of the applicants, situated within the jurisdiction of Police Station Keshli but, according to the FIR, it would be apparent that one incident was quoted by the complainant which took place within the jurisdiction of police station Silwani. For that incident, offence punishable under section 498-A, 323 and 506 of IPC is made out. Consequent...
Smt. Urmila Gupta Vs. Smt. Usha Gupta Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
1 W.P.No.13730/2013 W.P.13730/2013 21.01.2014 Shri Imitaz Hussain, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri N.K.Salunke, learned counsel for respondents. Order dated 15.07.2013 is being assailed vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India; whereby, on the basis of Will said to be executed by one Mahavir Prasad on 15.10.1987 applicants therein are being allowed to implead the petitioners as respondents on an application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The suit by the petitioners/plaintiffs is for permanent injunction against respondent/defendant No.1 and for a direction to hand over the vacant possession of the suit property situated in Mauja Bhadpura, Shobhapur KhaSr.No.391/7 Plot No.6 and 7 area 60x50=3000 square feet, Mahavir Sadan. In the suit which is directed against respondent/ defendant No.1, respondent No.2 to 6 filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for impleadment on the ground that t...
Amitesh Tyagi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.A.F.R. Judge M.Cr.C.No.1830/2012 Amitesh Tyagi and others VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh and another --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Anil Khare, Senior Advocate with Shri Priyankush Jain, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Yogesh Dhande, Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent No.1. Shri Aditya Ahiwasi, Advocate for the respondent No.2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 21st day of January, 2014) The applicants have preferred the present petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. against the registration of crime No.9/2010 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Bhopal on the FIR lodged by the respondent No.2 for offence punishable under sections 498-A, 506/34 of IPC.2. The prosecutions case, in short, is that, the complainant Shweta Sharma was married to Amitesh Tyagi on 11.11.20...
Shri Bharat Bhai Patel Vs. Smt. Radha Agrawal Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.1831/2012 Shri Bharat Bhai Patel VERSUS Smt. Radha Agrawal Criminal Revision No.1832/2012 Shri Bharat Bhai Patel VERSUS Smt. Radha Agrawal --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Amit Singh Handa, counsel for the applicant. None for the respondent though notice of the petition is served upon the respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 21st day of January, 2014) Both the revisions are connected with the same parties in a matter of similar nature and therefore, decided by a common order.2. In criminal revision No.1831/2012, the applicant has challenged the order dated 9.7.2012 passed by the learned JMFC, Jabalpur in complaint case No.239/2011, whereas in criminal revision No.1832/2012, the applicant has challenged the order dated 9.7.2012 passed by the - 2 - Criminal ...
Smt. Kranti @ Kiran Lodhi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Gi ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
Writ Petition No :: 17623 / 2013 Smt. Kranti @ Kiran Lodhi versus State of MP and others 21.01.2014. Petitioner in person with Shri R.P.Singh, Advocate. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, Government Advocate, for the State. The corpus is produced before this Court alongwith Police Personnel and a representative of the Nari Niketan, in whose custody she was sent on the last date of hearing. The corpus appears before this Court and on a perusal of the documents, it is seen that she is a minor and is about 15 years of age only. Her physical appearance also indicates the said fact. On queries being made to her, she points out that she has been misled by respondents 5 to 7 and, therefore, she has now realized her mistake and says that she wants to go with her mother and would stay with her parent happily. Mother of the corpus, petitioner herein, is also willing to take her back. Keeping in view the statement of the corpus and considering the fact that she is a minor and has to be given in custody to her m...
Smt. Zareena Begum Vs. Principal Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
Smt. Zareena Begum & ORS.versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.1063 / 2014 21.1.2014: Shri Rakesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Amit Pandey, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. It is stated in the petition that in terms of the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Janpad Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998, the petitioners would be entitled to grant of regular pay scale of the post of Shiksha Karmi. However, such a claim is not being considered, therefore, this writ petition is required to be filed. It is further stated that identical claim was made before the Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.602/2010 (S) by certain teachers of the similar category namely Mohanlal & others and the said writ petition has been disposed of vide order dated 22.01.2010 directing consideration of the claim of the persons like petitioners and, therefore, similar treatment may be given to the petitioneRs.This Court in the case of Mohanlal (supra) has p...
Kunwar Arjun Singh Mahavidyalaya, Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judg ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.10979/2011 KUNWAR ARJUN SINGH MAHAVIDYALAYA VS. STATE OF M.P. & OTHERS Present: Honble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.& Hon'ble Shri Anil Sharma, J.Shri Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Govt. Adv. for the State Government. Shri Vibhudendra Mishra, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 University. Shri K. K. Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.4 National Council for Teachers Education. _________________________________________________ As per : Hon'ble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.ORDER ( 2112014 ) Petitioner's Institute which is imparting B.Ed Education to various students feels aggrieved by the action of the Awadhesh Pratap Singh University, Rewa in not permitting the students of the College to fill the examination form and participate in the examination for the B.Ed Degree Course pertaining to academic Session 2009-2010. 2 2. It is the case of the petitioner's institute that th...
Bablu Kol Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.437/2013 Babbu Kol VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Nirupama Mishra, counsel for the appellant. Shri S.D.Khan, G.A. for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 21st day of January, 2014) The appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under section 326 of IPC and sentenced for 4 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.200/-. In default of payment of fine, 15 days additional sentence was also directed.2. The prosecution's case, in short, is that, on 24.11.2010, at about 3 p.m., the victim Mati Bai (P.W.3) was coming back from the river near the village Mertola. The appellant met her in the way and asked for the money. The victim denied that she had no amount. Thereafter, the appellant went with the victim to...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »