Madhya Pradesh Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kailash Chandra Tiwari Vs. Municipal Corporation Jabalpur
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.12569/2004 Kailash Chandra Tiwari. Vs Municipal Corporation Jabalpur. PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri Narendra Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for respondent. ORDER (17.9.2013) The grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner had completed requisite years of service, but was neither granted any promotion not the benefit of Kramonnati by the respondent-Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation for brevity).Seeking a direction against the respondent, a Writ Petition No.3134/2001 was filed by the petitioner, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 19.4.2013 to decide such a claim of the petitioner. Since there was no time limit prescribed despite service of the copy of the order passed by this Court, action was not taken by the respondent. Ultimately, since the petitioner has retired from service without an...
Rajman Biyar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
Writ Petition No.15665/2013 (O) 17.09.2013 Shri M. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Ashok Chourasiya, learned Govt. Adv.for respondent Nos.1,2 and 3. Heard. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ for the following reliefs:- 1. To issue a writ, direction, order in an appropriate nature directing the respondents to give the petitioners plot and package amount as per existing policy of rehabilitation, immediately.2. To pass any other writ/order/direction to which this court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of the case including the cost of the petition. Having heard the counsel, keeping in view his arguments, I have carefully gone through the papers placed on record. PetitioneRs.counsel submits that a representation, Annexure P-3 to resolve the dispute raised in this petition is still pending in the office of the authority of respondent no.2. So in such premises, instead to admit or i...
Shiv Shankar Prasad Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
W.P.No.3073/2013 (Shiv Shankar Prasad Pathak and others versus State of MP and otheRs.17.09.2013 Heard Shri Shyam Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State on advance copy on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners have filed this petition claiming appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak, Grade-III. It is submitted that the petitioners No.1 and 2 are holding D. Ed. Degree whereas the petitioners No.3 and 4 possess B. Ed. Degree and therefore, they are entitled to be appointed in view of the interim order passed by this court in W.P.No.17493/12(S).Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.it is observed that this court subsequently in Sanyogita Thakur and others v. State of M.P.and otheRs.reported in 2013 (2) MPLJ 206 has held that candidates possessing B.Ed. qualifications are not entitled to claim appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-III and that cases may be considered in case t...
Uda Ram Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
1 W.P.No.14817/13. 17.9.2013. None for the petitioner. Shri A.D.Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard on IA No.8334/11 and IA No.15530/12, the applications filed on behalf of the respondent/ decree holder for early hearing of this petition. As per averments of the applications due to interim stay passed by this Court in the present matter vide dated 26.9.2011 against further proceeding of impugned execution proceeding the respondent is not in a position to execute the decree which was obtained by him in the year 1998 and the same is pending since 18.5.2010. For the reasons stated in it, the same are allowed matter is taken up for admission and consideration of IA No.10785/11, the stay application. But it apparent fact that no one is present on behalf of the petition, so hearing on the question of admission is deferred with a direction to place the same after two weeks. In the available circumstances, taking into consideration that on dated 16.7.98 some Civil Judge, Class-I ...
Kamta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
1 Cr.R. No.169/2011 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA CRIMINAL REVISION NO.169/2011 APPLICANTS :1. Kamta S/o. Girdhari Sanodiya, 2. Ramli alias Ramdas, S/o. Bhagchand Both R/o. Village Khairitak, P.S. Seoni, Tehsil and District Seoni (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENT: State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicants by Shri Surendra Patel, Advocate. Respondent/State by Shri Anubhav Jain, Public Prosecutor. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (17.09.2013) This revision application under Section 397/401 of CrPC has been filed by the applicants against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.01.2011 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Seoni dismissing the criminal appeal No.109/2010 and thereby affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.08.2010 passed by le...
Deep Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
Writ Petition No.13571/2013 (O) 17.09.2013 Shri S.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Smt. Sheetal Dubey, learned Govt. Adv for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 and 5. Shri Vikram Singh, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1-UOI. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ for the following reliefs:- (1) To direct the respondents to give the adequate compensation @ 3200 Sq. Mtr. as business lands. (2) To issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to make enquiry into the matter and if found fit that the said lands are business land/diverted land the petitioners be paid compensation accordingly with prevailing rate of interest. (3) To issue a writ of prohibition not to acquire the land of the petitioner without giving any actual to the petitioneRs.(4) Any other relief which this court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case be also granted...
Bihari Lal Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
1 W.P.No.14997/2013. 17.9.2013. Shri Ajeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashok Chourasiya, learned G.A.for the respondent/ State. Having heard on the question of default, after perusing Annexure P.3 and P.4, the same is hereby ignored. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India for issuing appropriate writ for following reliefs:1. It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to assess proper compensation of the entire house, as well as the Pakka commercial house, according to the guidelines issued by the Collector, respondent No.1 to the petitioner with interest within the stipulated period.2. This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to pass any such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit under the circumstances of the case. Having heard the counsel keeping in view his arguments on perusing the record, I have found that the repr...
Maheshdas Vs. Neeta
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
Writ Petition No.15720/2013 (I) 17.09.2013 Shri K.B.Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.He is heard on the question of admission. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 22.8.2013, passed by the IInd Additional District Judge, Mandla in Co.No.12- A/08, whereby his application filed under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of CPC taking the annexed documents, i.e copies of old electricity bills, Registration of Shop & Establishment Department, so also some other documents have been dismissed at the fag end of the trial. Having heard the counsel, keeping in view the arguments, I have carefully gone through the record available in this petition. It is undisputed fact that the impugned suit pending for adjudication for last ten years before the trial court and the aforesaid application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners plaintiffs at the fag end of the trial when the evidence of the respondents- defend...
Bhargvendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
W.P.No.15824/2013 (Bhargvendra Singh versus State of MP and otheRs.17.09.2013 Heard Shri A.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Akash Choudhary, learned P.L.for the State on advance copy and Shri Praveen Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 on caveat, on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 26.08.2013 by which his representation against order of transfer dated 26.07.2012 has been rejected as well as order dated 02.09.2013 by which he has been relieved from Sidhi to join his transferred place of posting at Mandla. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was transferred to Sidhi on his own request by order dated 04.08.2011 as incharge Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kusmi, District Sidhi. It is stated that the petitioner had sought for transfer to Kusmi that is a place near to Sidhi to enable him to stay near his wife who is working as a Teacher in Govern...
Smt. Rekha Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
W.P.No.12429/2013 (Smt. Rekha Patel and others versus State of MP and otheRs.17.09.2013 Heard Shri Rajesh Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.and Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State on advance copy, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners have filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the petitioners are not being permitted to participate in the counselling being conducted for making appointments on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak, Grade-III though the petitioners are over qualified having obtained a B.Ed. degree. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after a perusal of the petition, it is observed on a statement to that effect being made by the learned counsel for the State, that similar petitions wherein the petitioners had raised the same issue, have been dismissed by this Court with observations in the case of Sanyogita Thakur and others v. State of M.P.and otheRs.reported in 2013 (2) MPLJ 20 and without any observati...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »