Madhya Pradesh Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. R.K. Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
W.P.No.14946/2013 (Dr. R.K.Mishra versus State of MP and otheRs.18.09.2013 Heard Shri K.D.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 13.08.2013 by which while imposing the penalty of stoppage of two increments non-cumulatively, the authority has denied the petitioner full salary during the period of suspension and has transferred the petitioner from Primary Health Center, Lakshmanpur District Rewa to District Hospital Sidhi. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that while, admittedly the petitioner has a remedy of appeal against the impugned order he has assailed the same in the present petition before this court on account of the fact that the authority while passing order of punishment under the rules has also imposed punishment of transfer which is not permissible under the rules and therefore, the impu...
Raghvendra Singh Vs. General Manager, (P/Admn)
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
Writ Petition No.16238/2013 18.09.2013 Shri R.B.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri G. Jain, learned counsel for respondents. Heard. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ for the following reliefs:- 1. To command the respondents not to throw out the house hold of the petitioners without following process of law.2. To direct the respondents to allow the petitioners for this year 2013-14 even on compensatory rent whatever just and proper as small children of the petitioners are studying in the school there at colony Jayant, 3. Any other relief which this court deems fit may be granted to the petitioner. PetitioneRs.counsel instead to argue the case on admission on entire merits, made his limited prayer with liberty to the petitioners to file their elaborate representation with respect of the dispute raised in this petition in the office of respondents- authorities with further prayer to direct such...
Bhim Singh Aoutiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
MCC No.1139/2013 (Bhim Singh Aoutiya and others versus State of MP and otheRs.18.09.2013 Heard Shri G.S.Uddey, learned counsel for applicants on the application for restoration of W.P.No.13868/13. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that as he could not appear in the case when it was taken up for hearing which resulted in dismissal of the aforesaid writ petition for want of prosecution. The application is supported by an affidavit of the counsel for the applicants and for the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed. The impugned order dated 29.08.2013 passed in W.P.No.13868/13 is recalled and the same is directed to be restored to its original number subject to deposit the cost of Rs.500/- with M.P.High Court Legal Services Committee, Jabalpur. M.C.C.stands allowed accordingly. A copy of this order be placed in the record of W.P.No.13868/13. C.C.as per rules. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Achhelal Verma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
W.P.No.16029/13 (Achhelal Verma versus State of MP and otheRs.18.09.2013 Heard Shri P.S.Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 06.09.2013 by which he has been transferred from Depot Officer Gadhasarai Depot Dindori (P) to Forest School Lakhnadon Seoni Circle on the ground that he is 58 years old and suffers from severe ailment and spondalysis.The petitioner alleges that he has been transferred in violation of the transfer policy. A Division Bench of this Court in R.S.Chaudhary versus State of M.P.and OtheRs.ILR [2007].MP 132.has already held that in case transfer is alleged to be contrary to the policy, the appropriate remedy of the petitioner is to approach the authority themselves by filing a representation. In view of the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect...
icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Vs. Khuman Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
1 W.P No.13789 o18. 9.2013 Shri Aditya Narayan Sharma counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3 registered owner of the offending vehicle although represented through duly engaged counsel. Looking to the nature of question involved in this petition, presence of respondent No.1 and 2 is not required as this petition cold be effectively adjudicated only in presence of the petitioner and respondent No.3, hence notice against respondent No.1 and 2, if the same is not served, are hereby dispensed with.2. Heard on the question of admission as well as for final disposal.3. Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the orders dated 8.7.11 (Anenx.P/2) and 13.7.11 (Annex.P/4) passed by the Ist Addl. Judge to Ist Addl. MACT (FTC) Chhindwara in Claim Case No.64/11 whereby the application of the petitioner filed under Order 11 rule 12 of the CPC for approprite direction to the respondent No.3 ...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Halke @ Chhote Bhaiya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
Criminal Appeal No.2253/2013 18/09/2013 Shri Mukhtar Ahmad, Advocate for the appellants. Heard. Admit. Shri Sameer Chille, GA accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/State. Record of the court below be called for. Also heard on I.A.No.20492/13, an application for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail to the appellant. Appellants have been convicted by the trial Court under sections 324/34, 325/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 1 year & fine of Rs.1000/-, RI for 2 years & fine of Rs.1500/- with default stipulations. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that trial Court has already suspended the jail sentence of appellants till 18/09/2013. The appeal would take considerable time to dispose of finally, hence he prays for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail to the appellants. Learned counsel for the State opposes the application. On due consideration of the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties alongwith the fact that trial Court has alrea...
M/S Scc Projects Pvt. Limited Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
R.P.No.753/2013 M/s SCC Projects PVT.Limited versus State of M.P.& ORS.18/09/2013 Shri Greeshm Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Seeking correction in certain typographical error in the order dated 31.7.2013 in W.P.No.17784/2012, this application has been filed. While disposing of the said writ petition on 31.7.2013, this Court indicated that the appellate authority before whom the appeal was pending is the Engineer-in-Chief, whereas the appellate authority is the Chief Engineer and not the Engineer-in- Chief. In view of the above, this application is allowed. The designation of the appellate authority indicated as Engineer-in- Chief in the order dated 31.7.2013 be read as Chief Engineer. instead of Engineer-in-Chief. With the aforesaid correction to the order dated 31.7.2013 in W.P.No.17784/2012, this application is allowed and disposed of. Certified Copy as per rules. (Rajendra Menon) (Smt. Vimla Jain) Judge Judge nd...
Sukhdayal Jaiswal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
R.P.No.748/2013 ( Sukhdayal Jaiswal versus State of MP and otheRs.18.09.2013 Shri J. Arya, learned counsel for the applicant. The present application has been filed for correction in the order dated 02.09.2013 in W.P.No.14027/2013. The application is allowed and it is directed that the word Balaghat. mentioned in third line of the second page of the order dated 02.09.2013 in W.P.No.14027/2013 shall be read as Betul. The order is accordingly modified and corrected and in place of the word Balaghat. it be not read as Betul.Registry is directed to make a note in the margin of the order dated 02.09.2013 passed in W.P.No.14027/2013 regarding the aforesaid correction and after necessary correction rescan the order dated 02.09.2013 and certified copy of the scanned copy be supplied as and when applied for. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Dharmendra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
Criminal Appeal No.699/2013 18/09/2013 Shri S.K.Gangrade, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Sudesh Verma, learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. Heard on I.A.No.20558/13, which is the second application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of appellant Raju @ Raja Babu. The fiRs.application was dismissed as withdrawn. Appellant stand convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302/149, 147, 148, 325/149 of IPC and has been sentenced to suffer Life Imprisonment, RI for 6 months, RI for 1 month, RI for 2 years with fine of Rs.5000/-, Rs.1000/- with default stipulations as mentioned in the impugned judgment. The contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that in the connected criminal appeal No.697/2009 (Bhure Singh versus State of M.P.).the appellant of that case Bhure Singh has been released on bail on the ground that he was young boy aged about 21 years at the time of incident. Learned counsel has submitted that the present ap...
NitIn Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
W.P.No.14939/2013 (Nitin Tiwari and another versus State of MP & Ors.) 18.09.2013 Shri A.K.Tiwari, the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioneRs.who are holder of B.Ed. Degree and had participated in the selection process for appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-III, have filed this petition stating that they have not been permitted to participate in the process of selection. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and after a perusal of the petition, it is observed on a statement to that effect being made by the learned counsel for the State, that similar petitions, wherein the petitioners had raised the same issue, have been dismissed by this Court with observations in the case of Sanyogita Thakur and others v. State of M.P.and otheRs.reported in 2013 (2) MPLJ 206 and without any observations in the case of Jai Prakash Naraya...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »