Madhya Pradesh Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Riyaz Mohammad Khan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
Writ Petition No.15019 / 2013 (Riyaz Mohammad Khan ..Vs..State of M.P.& otheRs.19-09-2013 Heard Shri Anoop Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition submitting that the petitioner was initially removed while working as a peon in the establishment of the respondents against which he had approached the Labour Court, Bhopal, who had passed an award in favour of the petitioner on 17-11-2011 directing reinstatement on account of non-compliance of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. It is stated that the State had filed a W.P.No.2535/2012 against the award passed by the Collector and the Labour Court, which was dismissed by order dated 15-2-2012 maintaining the order of reinstatement. It is further submitted that the Collector, Sehore, instead of complying with the order of this Court in letter and spirit, has now issued the impugned order dated 27-7-2013 by which the petitioner has not been...
Basant Kumari Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
Writ Petition No.15411/13 19.09.2013 Shri Mahesh Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Amit Sharma, learned P.L.for the State/respondents no.1 to 3 on advance notice. Heard. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing the appropriate writ against the respondents for the following reliefs:- (1) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to follow the due procedure contemplated in Land Acquisition Act for acquisition of the lands of the petitioner in question in accordance with law. (2) To direct the respondents to compensate the petitioner suitably for their valuable land/house in question with all the benefits extended by formulating the Rehabilitation policy in lieu of acquisition being made for the project of the respondent concerned, by considering and deciding their representation made to redress their grievance. Having heard the counsel, keeping in view the arguments, on perusing the record, I...
M.N.Nema Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Writ Petition No.19245/2003 O.A. No.1007/2002 Manoharlal Nema Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi. Shri C.A. Thomas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State. ORDER (19.09.2013) The petitioner a retired Joint Director of Public Instructions has approached the M.P. Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, ventilating his grievance against the order dated 07.01.2002, by which a penalty of forfeiting 50% of pension of the petitioner permanently under the Provisions of Rule 9 of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules') has been imposed after a departmental enquiry. The Original Application pending before Tribunal was transmitted to this Court after closer of the Tribunal and has been registered as a Writ Petition.2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this petition 2 are that the petitioner while was wo...
Dr.Anil Choubey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
1 WP. No 17433/2007(S) HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sujoy Paul Writ Petition No.17433/2007 (S) Dr. Anil Choubey Versus State of M.P. and another --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri V.S. Shroti, Sr. Advocate with Shri Johri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER ( 19/09/2013) By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has assailed the order Annexure P/9 dated nil/December, 2007. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this matter are as follows:2. The petitioner was initially appointed as lecturer on 08.09.1972. The post of lecturer was re-designated as Asstt. Professor. The petitioner became Asstt. Professor in subject of Military science. The UGC introduced the pay scales which w...
Vinod Bramhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
W.P.No.15037/2013 Vinod Bramhan (Agnihotri) vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 19.09.2013 Shri Pramod Singh Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondent/State, on advance copy. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that his claim for appointment on the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (LDC) and Subedar (Stenographer) has been rejected by stating that the certificate obtained by the petitioner from Dr.C.V. Raman University, Science and Technology, Commerce and Management, Raipur, Chhattisgarh cannot be accepted for want of affiliation, registration and recognition by the UGC or the concerned University in Chhattisgarh. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid rejection of the petitioner's claim is contrary to the instructions issued by the State Government from time to time, Annexure P-4, and therefore, the respondents be directed to...
Tilloo @ Gyan Chand Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.624/1994 Danny alias Arvind Kumar....Appellant Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh...Respondent Criminal Appeal No.540/1994 Tillu alias Gyan Chand....Appellant Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh...Respondent For the appellants : Shri S. C. Datt, Senior Advocate, with Shri Siddharth Datt and Shri Ajay Mishra, Advocates. For the respondent : Shri Yogesh Dhande, Government Advocate. ****** Present: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B. D. RATHI ****** JUDGMENT (19.9.2013) The following judgment of the Court was delivered by : Ajit Singh, J.By this common judgment, Criminal Appeal No.624/1994 (Danny alias Arvind Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh) and Criminal Appeal No.540/1994 (Tillu alias Gyan Chand v. State of Madhya Pradesh) are being decided because they arise out of the same judgment dated 30.4.1994 passed in Sessions Trial No.43/1993 by the Third Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar.2. Appellant Danny has ...
Narendra Singh Vs. Coal India Ltd. and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
1 W.P No.387/2000 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.387/2000 PETITIONER : NARENDRA SINGH Vs. RESPONDENTS : COAL INDIA LIMITED AND ANOTHER. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the petitioner : Shri Akash Choudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Smt. Indira Nair, Senior Counsel with Shri Rajas Pohankar, Advocate. Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. ORDER (19/09/2013) The petitioner has filed this petition challenging order dated 9.12.1998 by which a penalty of reduction to a lower stage in time scale for a period of two years has been imposed upon the petitioner. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 1/5.4.1999 by which the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Appellate Authority.2. The brief facts, leading to the filing of the present petition, are that the petitioner, who at the relevant time was working as a Survey Officer in the establishment of the respondents, was ...
Rajesh Gupta Vs. Mohini Gupta
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
Writ Petition No.15420/13 19.09.2013 Shri Vasant Danial, learned counsel for the petitioner. He is heard on the question of admission. The petitioner/plaintiff/husband, has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order dated 27.6.2013, passed by IInd Additional District Judge Mandla, in Hindu Marriage case No.11/12, whereby in a proceedings of the plaintiff filed under Section 13 of the aforesaid Act, the application of the respondent/wife filed under Section 24 of the same Act, has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.5,000/- per month, as interim alimony till disposal of the suit. Petitioners counsel after taking me through the averments of the petition as well as the papers placed on record along with the impugned order argued that, the impugned petition has been filed for declaring the marriage to be abinitio void, because the respondent was a lady of mental disorder from the date of marriage but by concealin...
Chameli Bai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
1 Writ Petition No.732/2008 19.09.2013 Ms.Jayalakshmi Aiyer, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.P.Pandey, learned counsel for respondents/State. None for other respondents. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against order dated 12.11.2007 passed by Additional Commissioner, Division Jabalpur, Jabalpur whereby the revision preferred by respondent No.6 against order passed by Additional Collector, Katni in respect of appointment of petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Karyakarta, Centre village Keolari has been allowed and the matter has been remitted to the authorities concerned, for reappointment of Anganwadi Karyakarta in pursuance to circular No.F/3-2/06/50-2 dated 10.07.2007 issued by Women and Child Development Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh. Petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Karyakarta, Village Keolari in pursuance to resolution 2 Writ Petition No.732/2008 dated 09.09.2001. Respondent No.6-Smt.Rajia Begum being aggrieved by...
Phool Singh Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
(1) HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.2481/1997 Phool Singh Vs. State of M.P. As Per : G.S.Solanki, J.Shri S.K. Gangrade, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Sameer Chile, PL for the State. JUDGMENT [19.9.2013].1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by conviction and sentence recorded by Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad in S.T. No.177/96 vide order dated 14.10.1997 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 307 of the IPC and sentenced to R.I. for 5 years.2. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 14.3.1996, cow of the appellant entered into the field of complainant Narmada Prasad and caused damage to his crops, thereafter, when Narmada Prasad was taking the cow to Kanji House, appellant intercepted him and gave one blow on his head and one blow on right leg by an Axe. Narmada Prasad sustained injuries. The incident was seen by brother of complainant namely Surendra Kumar. The complainan...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »