Madhya Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shailendra Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
W.P.No.14289/2013 Shailendra Shukla & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 30.08.2013 Heard Shri G.S.Baghel learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners have filed this petition being aggrieved by the notices dated 1.8.2013 and 31.7.2013 respectively by which they have been informed that as the programme under the Norway India Partnership Initiative (NIPI) has been decided to be closed down, therefore, the petitioners services are dispensed with w.e.f.31.8.2013. The petitioners have also challenged the communication dated 31.7.2013 issued by the Director of the National Rural Health Mission, Bhopal whereby he has stated that the Phase-2 NIPI Programme has not sanctioned the setup and, therefore, the State Level Committee in its meeting dated 30.5.2013 has decided not to continue the services of persons appointed under the Scheme after 31.8.2013 and, therefore, they be dispensed with by giving one month's notice as prescribed under the...
Krishnadhar Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
W.P.No.13982/2013 (Krishnadhar Dwivedi and others versus State of MP and otheRs.30.08.2013 Heard Smt. Sudha Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners have filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondents/authorities to issue the order of appointment of the petitioners who have succeeded in the examination conducted by the respondents for making appointment on the post of class III employee, however, after arguing at length, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petition filed by the petitioners be disposed of with a direction to the respondents/authorities to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners Annexure P/7 dated 20.03.2012 expeditiously, in accordance with law. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the record , the prayer made by the petitioneRs.counsel is allowed and the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of ...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Gulli @ Laxman Sour
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
M.Cr.C.No.11377/2013 30.8.13 Per B.D.Rathi,J Shri C.K.Mishra, Government Advocate for the applicant- State. Heard on admission. This application for grant of leave to file appeal has been preferred under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved with the judgment dated 12/4/2013 passed by III Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh, in Sessions Trial No.167/11, whereby respondent has been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 354, 450, 376 and 506 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC. for short).Prosecution case, in brief, is that in the night intervening 13th and 14th of January 2011, respondent entered into her house, and under threat to kill her, subjected the prosecutrix to sexual assault. Thereafter, again, under duress, he subjected her to sexual intercouRs.on two occasions in her house and twice in the field. FiRs.Information Report was lodged by the prosecutrix on 14/6/2011 at Police Station Palera, and after investigation, charge-sheet was fi...
Ku. Shakun Mehra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
W.P.No.13934/2013 Ku. Shakun Mehra vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 30.08.2013 Heard Shri G.S.Baghel learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the respondents have cancelled the selection of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Sub Inspector on the ground that on verification it was found that the typing and stenography certificate possessed by the petitioner is not in accordance with the prescribed standard. It is, however, observed that the petitioner has directly approached this Court without approaching the authorities or bringing to their notice the orders of this Court or the directions issued by the Government of India and the circulars and other documents in respect of the validity of the certificate possessed by the petitioner. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the matter requires to be looked into by the authority concerned and, t...
Narayan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
Cr.A.No.2114/2013. 30.8.13 Per B.D.Rathi,J Shri Deepak Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent no.1-State. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 22/07/2013 passed by Sessions Judge, Jabalpur, in Sessions Trial No.759/2012, whereby respondent Nos.2 to 4 namely Bhutta alias Vishnu Mallah, Asharam and Keshri Gond have been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC. for short).Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 25/09/2012 at about 1.30 to 2.00 p.m.co-accused Sunnu @ Sunil Gond had come to the house of Bhagwan Singh (since deceased).Bhagwan Singh, after taking Rs.10,000/- from his wife, went with Sunnu to bring labour and when he did not return for 2 -3 days, his wife informed her brothers-in-law Prakash Singh and Dhansingh. On searching,...
Rajendra Prasad Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
Cr.A.No.555/2011 30.8.13 Per B.D.Rathi,J Shri A.D.Mishra, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Yogesh Dhande, Government Advocate for the respondent no.1-State. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 23/07/10 passed by I Additional Sessions Judge, Satna, in Sessions Trial No.36/08, whereby respondents No.2 Vimlesh Tiwari has been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 376, 342 and 506 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC. for short).Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 29/12/07 at about 3.30 p.m., when the prosecutrix, aged about 8 yeaRs.along with her sister and cousin (sister) was going to the agricultural field, respondent no.2 asked her to accompany him and on her denial came from behind, caught her and took her to the Pump House of one Rajbhan Patel, where he subjected her to rape. After giving Rs.3/-, he threatened her that sh...
Ram Prasad Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
W.P.No.13994/2013 (R.P.Patel versus State of MP and otheRs.30.08.2013 Heard Shri Rakesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondents/authorities to comply with the order passed in W.P.No.17419/03 decided on 14.07.2004. It is submitted that the petitioner has awaited compliance of account of the fact that the State had filed an S.L.P.before the Supreme Court which was registered as S.L.P.No.7618/09 and was ultimately dismissed on 10th of October, 2012. It is submitted that after dismissal of the SLP the petitioner has again approached the respondents/authorities but they have not taken any steps to comply with the order, hence this petition. Looking to the fact that the order passed in W.P.No.17419/03 has prima facie attained finality, the prayer made by the petitioner is allowed and the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case t...
Ganpat Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
Criminal Appeal No.2574/1997 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.2574/1997 Appellant : Ganpat S/o of Sakru, aged about 59 years, occupation-Cultivator, resident of village Chanewara, P.S. Changotola, Tehsil and District- Balaghat, M.P. Vs. Respondent : The State of Madhya Pradesh Present: Hon. Shri Justice B.D.Rathi For appellant : Shri Pranay Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Shri C.K. Mishra, Government Advocate JUDGMENT ( 30.8..2013) This appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code.) against the judgment dated 6.12.1997 passed by Sessions Judge, Balaghat in Sessions Trial No.192/1996, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 5 years, while co- accused Veer Singh and Narsu were acquitted of the offence charged with.2. According to the prosecution case, on 2/7/96 at 10.40 a.m., Manglu (PW1) along with his father Phool Singh an...
Ku.Snehlata Sahu Vs. Registrar Rani Durgawati Vishwavidyalaya Jabalpur
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
W.P.No.6320/2013 (Ku. Snehlata Sahu and another versus Registrar, R.D.V.V.30.08.2013 Heard Shri N.N.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners have filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondents/authorities to declare their result of final year of B. Ed. examination held in the year 2007-08. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.it is observed that the petitioners have been sitting silent over the matter since 2008 and have not approached the respondents/authorities by filing a representation dated 16.03.2013 praying for declaration of their result. The issue as to whether the petitioneRs.result can be declared or not, has to be examined by the respondents/authorities in accordance with the provisions of the rules. In the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petition...
Kuldeep Gome Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
M.Cr.C.No.4187/2013 30/08/2013 Shri Manish Datt, Sr.counsel with Shri Ajay Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Yogendra Das Yadav, PL for the respondent/State. Heard finally. This is the second application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail. The fiRs.application was dismissed as withdrawn on 26/03/13. Applicant has been arrested on 9/05/12 in connection with Crime No.224/12 registered at P.S.Habibganj, District Bhopal for the offence punishable under sections 304-B, 498-A/34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that after dismissal of fiRs.application main witnesses like Shanti Bai (PW-1).Kamlesh (PW-2) respectively mother and brother of deceased have been examined by the police. It is further submitted that statement of father Gangaram has not been recorded by the police. Trial would take considerable time to dispose of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant. Learned counsel for the State opposes the application. On du...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »