Madhya Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jhabboo Lal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
1 W.P. No.13295/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Writ Petition No.13295/2012 PETITIONER : Jhabboo Lal, S/o. Babulal, R/o. Sawarpani, Tehsil Tamia, District Chhindwara (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENTS:1. The State of Madhya Pradesh through Forest Division Chhindwara (M.P.) 2. Chief Forest Officer, Chhindwara (M.P.) 3. Anil Sarathe, Van Rakshak, Chawalpani, Chhindwara --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner by Shri Tribhuvan Mishra, Advocate. Respondents by Shri Anubhav Jain, Panel Lawyer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (29.07.2013) By this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought a direction to release the Tractor which has been confiscated by the respondents.2. The brief facts of the case are that the tractor in question was being used by the petition...
Jagdish Prasad Pandey Vs. Suresh Kumar Dwivedi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
Cr.A.No.355/2012 29.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri P.K.Saxena, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Amit Pandey, Government Advocate for the respondent no.3-State. Heard on I.A.No.2658/12, which is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay. As per office note, the appeal is barred by 311 days. Considering the reasons assigned therein, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is, hereby, condoned. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 25/1/11 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Singrouli in Sessions Trial No.23/2010 (Old S.T.No.187/2006).whereby respondent nos.1 & 2 have been acquitted of the offences under Sections 302/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC.).Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 12/10/06, Ramkishore Kushwaha informed at Police Station Bargawan that foul smell w...
Dr. Manish Purohit Vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gaur Vishwa Vidhyalaya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
W.P.No.11840/2010 (Dr. Manish Purohit and others versus The Registrar, Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwa Vidhyalaya Sagar) 29.07.2013 Shri T.K.Khadka, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Smt. Shobha Menon, learned senior counsel with Shri C.A.Thomas, for the respondent/University. Learned senior counsel for the respondent/University submits that the petitioners have already been called for interview in the selection undertaken by the respondent for making permanent appointments and therefore, they shall be permitted to continue to work as guest lecturers subject to their selection and subject to the order of appointments of regular incumbents. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be disposed of recording the aforesaid statement. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and recording the statement of the learned senior counsel for the University, the petition is disposed of in terms thereof. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Jamuna Prasad Jaiswal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
Cr.A.No.565/2012 29.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri D.Asati, Advocate for the appellant. Shri C.K.Mishra, Government Advocate for the respondent no.1-State. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 10/2/12 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Waidhan, Singrouli in Sessions Trial No.401/2010, whereby respondents have been acquitted of the offences under Sections 302/34, 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the Code.).Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 3/2/10, FiRs.Information Report (Ex.P/1) at Police Station Sarai, District Singrouli, was lodged by complainant Yantrilal to the effect that on 2/2/10 at about 7.30 p.m., his brother Chhotelal had gone to irrigate the fields. Next day morning, Ramadhar Jaiswal informed that a dead body was lying at Mudhi Patera. He reached the spot and saw that his brother was lying dead and injuries of sh...
Eknath Gajbhiye Vs. Rajesh @ Rajkumar Gajbhiye
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
Second Appeal No.637/2013 29.07.2013 Mr.G.S.Baghel, learned counsel for the appellants. Let records of the Courts below be sent for. Registry is directed to issue requisition for records within a week. Heard on I.A.No.8169/2013. On payment of P.F.by registered post with acknowledgment due within a week issue notice of aforesaid I.A.to the respondents. Notices be made returnable within a period of 6 weeks. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that in case of execution of sale-deed, the appellants shall suffer irreparable injury. Taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the appellants and in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Maharwal Khewaji Trust (Regd.).Faridkot versus Baldev Dass, (2004) 8 SCC 488.it is directed that the execution of sale-deed in favour of respondents in execution of impugned decree shall remain stayed till next date of hearing. Let the appeal be listed for orders on admission as well as for consideration of aforesaid I.A....
Pradeep Patonia Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
W.P.No.10959/2013 Pradeep Patonia vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 29.07.2013 Heard Shri Rohit Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner, though selected and qualified to be appointed on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-II, has not been given appointment on the ground that the respondent no.4 deliberately did not accept the documents and thereafter has ousted the petitioner from the process of selection. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already filed a representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raisen, Annexure P-11, which is pending decision. In the circumstances, as the petitioner's representation is pending before the respondent no.2 Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raisen, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case...
Ajay Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
W.P.No.12171/2013 Ajay Kumar Mishra vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 29.07.2013 Heard Shri Gyanendra Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that though he has fulfilled all the conditions prescribed in the advertisement for appointment on the post of Pharmacist on contractual basis, he has not been called for counselling for the same. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the claim of the petitioner for being considered for appointment as Pharmacist on contract basis, has not been considered by the respondent authorities by stating that his experience certificate is from Allahabad. It is submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation before the Collector, Rewa which is pending decision. In the circumstances, as the matter has already been taken up by the petitioner before the Collector, Rewa, the petition filed by the petitioner is dispose...
Rukhsana Ansari Vs. Chief Medical and Halth Officer
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
W.P.No.12172/2013 Rukhsana Ansari vs. Chief Medical & Health Officer & ORS.1 29.07.2013 Heard Shri Pranay Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Commissioner, Shahdol, Division Shahdol whereby the appeal filed by respondent no.3 has been dismissed and the concerned Gram Panchayat has been directed to take up fresh proceedings by issuing an advertisement for appointment on the post of Asha Karyakarta in accordance with the guidelines issued by the State Government and not in accordance with the directions issued by the Block Medical Officer of the concerned Block. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the age qualification prescribed by the State in its guidelines was 25 to 45 years whereas the advertisement issued by the Gram Panchayat prescribes 22 years as the minimum age. It is stated that as the Commissioner h...
Babulal Solanki Vs. Dr. Madan Mohan Gupta
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
C.R.No.466 o29. 07.2013 None for the applicant. Shri Shobitaditya, learned counsel for the respondent. This case is listed today for admission and consideration of IA No.12818/10, an application for grant of stay against operation and execution of the impugned eviction order passed by the Rent Controlling Authority. Earlier this matter was listed on 22.11.2010, 18.2.2013 and 19.6.2013 but on taking up the matter for hearing on admission, on all such dates, no one was present on behalf of the applicant to prosecute the same and the same position is today. So in such premises, it appears that the applicant is no more interested in prosecuting this revision. Consequently this revision filed under Section 23-E of M.P.Accommodation Control Act 1961, is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. Pursuant to it, interim order, if any, passed earlier has also come to an end. C c as per rules. ( U.C.Maheshwari ) Judge bks...
M.A.Qureshi Vs. Madhya Pradesh Housing Construction and Infrastructure ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
W.P.No.12677/2013 (M.A.Qureshi versus MP Housing Construction & Infrastructure and Development Board and otheRs.29.07.2013 Heard Shri Rajneesh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner, who is an Assistant Engineer, has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 11.07.2013 by which he has been transferred to Sub Division Sheopur, Murena, Division. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the transfer of the petitioner is in violation of the transfer policy inasmuch as it results in separating the husband and wife. It is submitted that the petitioner's wife is working as a Lecturer in Government Urdu Girls Higher Secondary School, Indore and therefore the petitioner could have been permitted to stay at Indore itself. It is also submitted that the petitioner is being replaced by a Sub Engineer which is not permissible in law. It is further submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »