Madhya Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Bheeka @ Bhopali
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
Misc. Criminal Case No.6268/2012 31.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri Amit Pandey, Government Advocate for the applicant- State. Heard on admission. This is an application for grant of leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code. for short).By the impugned judgment dated 30/3/12 passed by Special Sessions Judge, Harda in Criminal Case No.39/10, respondents have been acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the Code.) respectively. Prosecution case, in brief, is that against a preexisting dispute between Sunil and Bhika alia Bhopali, on 27/3/10 at about 10.30 p.m., when Sushila was returning with her husband Sunil after meeting her sister and had to halt due to a passing train near the house of Bhika, respondents Ramu, Bhika, Ram and co-accused Mahesh Balahi along with 1-2 boys came outside the house of Bhika. Respondent Ramu dealt a stone blow on the head of Sunil and pressed his mouth. R...
Suresh Kumar Thakre Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
W.P.No.28/2013 Suresh Kumar Thakre & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 31.07.2013 Shri Brijesh Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.The default, pointed out by the office is ignored. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioneRs.who are Guest TeacheRs.have filed this petition being aggrieved by notification dated 1.8.2010 and are also claiming regularization. The learned counsel for the petitioneRs.however, submits that the petitioners wants to be regularized on the post of contract teachers and for this purpose the petitioners have filed a representation, Annexure P-4, before the respondent/State which is pending consideration. It is submitted that the petition be disposed of by directing the authorities to consider the same. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.it is observed that as the petitioners have already approached the respondent authorities for mitigation of their grievance, I find no reason to entertain the present petition. The prayer of the learn...
Goru Vs. Devendra Nath
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K.Gupta,J SECOND APPEAL NO.246 OF 201.Goru. Vs. Devendra Nath & others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Imtiaz Husain, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Jagtendra Prasad, Advocate for the respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 31st day of July, 2013) The Civil Judge Class-I, Multai District Betul vide judgment and decree dated 30.8.2005 in Civil Suit No.188- A/1994 decreed the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs against the appellant for possession and arrears of rent of the suit accommodation on the ground of Section 12(1)(c) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 1961.). In Appeal No.5-A/2011 the learned First Additional District Judge Multai District Betul vide judgment and decree dated 15.12.2011 dismissed the a...
Vishwajeet Singh Bhadoriya Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.15111/2003 (O.A. No.2617/2000) Vishwajeet Singh Bhadoriya Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ Shri Manot Chansoriya, learned Counsel on behalf of Shri Atul Rai, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents- State. ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (30/07/2013) Originally the petition was filed before the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal being O.A. No.2617/2000, which remained pending before the Tribunal till its closure and has been transmitted to this Court thereafter and is registered as writ petition. The claim made by the petitioner is for grant of benefit of increment of pay from the initial date of appointment in the light of decision rendered by the Tribunal in the case...
Shilam Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
W.P.No.12253/2013 Smt.Nidhi Agrawal vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 30.07.2013 Heard Shri A.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner,on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner, who has participated in the selection process for appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-II, has not been given appointment though she is qualified and her name has been placed in the list of candidates whose documents have not been verified. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed a representation in this regard before the authorities on 11/7/2013 which has not been decided till date, and, therefore the authorities be directed to do so. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the case or making any comments upon the entitlement of the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is...
Prakash Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.573/2012 Appellant : Prakash Ahirwar son of Late Ramdayal Ahirwar, aged about 35 years, resident of Nai Basti Marhotaal, District-Jabalpur (M.P.) Vs. Respondent : The State of Madhya Pradesh Through P.S. Gohalpur District-Jabalpur (M.P.) For appellant : Shri Hemant Namdeo, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Amit Pandey, Government Advocate Present: Hon. Shri Justice Ajit Singh Hon. Shri Justice B.D.Rathi JUDGMENT ( 30 /7/13) As per B.D.Rathi,J Being aggrieved with the judgment passed on 31/08/2005 in Sessions Trial No.80/2005 by Sessions Judge, Jabalpur, this criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellant/accused, whereby the appellant has been convicted under section 364, 302, 201 of IPC and sentenced accordingly.2. Prosecution case, in brief, is that Shubham was not traceable since 12/11/2004. Next day, at about 3 to 4 pm, when one Krishnakumar met Sunita, she weepingly informed him that her son Subham was missing since...
Maniram Vs. Ramkali
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K.Gupta,J SECOND APPEAL NO.970 OF 201.Maniram & others. Vs. Ramkali & others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.B.Singh, Advocate for the appellants. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 30th day of July, 2013) The Civil Judge Class-II, Jaisingh Nagar District Shahdol vide judgment and decree dated 25.6.2008 partly allowed the civil suit of the respondents No.1 to 11 and declared their title over the land bearing Survey No.669/832 area 0.825 hectare situated at Village Masiyari Patwari Halka Chitraon Tahsil Jaisingh-Nagar District Shahdol, whereas in appeal the learned Additional District Judge Beohari District Shahdol vide judgment and decree dated 27.7.2011 accepted the appeal and declared the title of the respondents No.1 to 11 on that land having area of 0.8...
Naval Singh Sahkari Shakkar Harkhkana Vs. Commissioner for Workmen Com ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR SB: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL SHARMA, J. Misc. Appeal No.1282/2002 Naval Singh Sahkari Shakkar Karkhkana Mdt. Versus Commissioner for Workmen Compensation and ORS.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Shailesh Mishra, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Suresh Raj, Advocate for the respondent No.6. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT (30/07/2013) This appeal has been filed by the appellant / employer under Section 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 being aggrieved by the judgment dated 20.5.2002 passed by the learned respondent No.1 in case No.30/2000 (WCF) imposing penalty of Rs.90,000/- on the appellant.2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the deceased Vinay Kumar Mishra was working with the appellant as Peon and on 13.4.2000 he died due to heart attack when he was on duty. Legal representatives of the deceased filed claim unde...
Smt.Fatima Bi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
1 W.P.8765/2007 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K.Shrivastava Writ Petition No.8765 of 2007 PETITIONERs.Smt. Fatima Bi (Since dead through Lrs.) 1. Khudayar Khan, son of Shaharyar Khan 2. Shahdulla Khan son of Dilwaj Khan 3. Kifayatulla Khan, son of Dil Waj Khan, (Died on 18.02.2009) through LRs (i) Smt. Badrun Nisha, widow of Kifayatulla Khan. (ii) Himayatulla Khan, son of Kifayatulla Khan. Both residents of Sohagpur, Ward No.1, Tehsil Sohagpur District Shahdol (MP) 4. Afjal Khan son of Asgar Khan, 5. Mohd. Islam Khan, S/o Asgar Khan 6. Deedar Khan son of Shri Asgar Khan 7. Ajhar Khan son of Asgar Khan, 8. Akhtar Khan son of Asgar Khan, 9. Akmal Khan son of Asgar Khan 10. Ajmal Khan son of Asgar Khan aged about 36 yeaRs.11. Mohd. Sarjan Khan son of Asgar Khan 12. Ikratulla Khan, son of Shahdulla Khan All residents of Sohagpur, Ward No.1 Tehsil Sohagpur District Shahdol (M.P.) 2 W.P.8765/2007 Versus RESPONDENTS:1. State of M.P.through Principa...
Abid Hassan Vs. the M.P.State Electricity Board
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.6760/2004 Abid Hassan Vs. The Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board. PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi. J.Shri Arvind Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anoop Nair and Shri K. Rohan, learned counsel for the respondent. ORDER (30 .07.2013) The grievance of the petitioner is that though a Scheme was made by the respondent for grant of higher grade pay scale way back, to those employees who have completed 9 years of service on one post without any promotion, such a benefit was not extended to the petitioner only because of the adverse entry recorded in his confidential report. Further claim of the petitioner is that the direct recruitment process was started on the post of Diploma Trainee, but again the petitioner was not found fit for such appointment in the year 1988-89 because of the adverse entry recorded in his confidential report. 2 Subsequently the petitioner was appointed as Diploma Trainee in the year...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »