Madhya Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Standarad Tent House Colectrate Raod Vs. Rani Duragavati Vishwavid ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K.Gupta,J FIRST APPEAL NO.21 OF 200.M/s Standard Tent House & another. Vs. Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri B.M.Dwivedi, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Suyash Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 22nd day of July, 2013) The appellants have preferred the present first appeal against the order dated 22.9.2006 passed by the 9th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No.1-B/2004 whereby the suit was dismissed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC being barred by limitation.2. The appellants have preferred a civil suit before the trial Court that the appellant No.1 is a partnership firm providing the material of tent house to the various offices etc. The appellant-firm provided such ...
Ashok Kumar Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
(1) Writ Appeal No.693/2013 22.07.2013 Shri D.K.Dixit, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, Govt. Advocate for respondents. It is submitted by the appellant that as per the Rules namely M.P.Police Executive (Gazetted) Service Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2000, appellant cannot be posted as Deputy Commandant. The aforesaid post could have been filled up only in case where there is a direct recruitment while the appellant is a promotee to the post of Additional Superintendent of Police and could not have been posted as Deputy Commandant. It is also submitted that some junior persons have been assigned the charge of Additional Superintendent of Police ignoring the seniority of the appellant. During the couRs.of hearing, a fact reveals that two persons were posted at Jabalpur as Addl. S.P.(crime) and Addl. S.P.(Traffic).Earlier the appellant was assigned both the charges but after passing of the order by the writ court on 16.7.2013 those persons have been assigned the afo...
Lelam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
1 W.P.1909/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No.1909 of 2013 SINGLE BENCH: JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Petitioner : Lelam S/o Shri Narayan Prasad R/o Gram Jova, Tahsil Ghansor, District Seoni, M.P.-Versus- RespondentS:1. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P.2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Seoni, M.P.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner by - Shri Vipin Yadav, Advocate. Respondents by Shri Anubhav Jain, Panel Lawyer ORDER ( 22/07/2013) For the reasons stated in the order passed today in W.P.No.1911/2013 (Jalam versus State of M.P.and another).this petition is also allowed. The impugned order dated 05.10.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ghansor, District Seoni Annexure P/3 is hereby quashed. No costs. (A.K.Shrivastava) Judge rao 2 W.P.1909/2013 3 W.P.1909/2013...
Om Jansahyog Samiti Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
1 WP No.12422/13 22.07.2013. Shri Dinesh Upadhyay, learned counsel for petitioner.Shri P.K.Kaurav, learned Addl.AG for respondents no.1 to 5. Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- (a) To direct the respondent authority to ensure that no vehicle can be parked over the road of the Jabalpur city and further direct the respondent authorities to take legal action against the persons who illegally park the vehicle on the road violating the rules and regulations ; (b) To direct the respondents authority to take legal action against the shop keeper or complex owner who is running the shop without providing parking space to the customeRs.(c) To direct the respondents authority to take continuous action against the illegal parking over the road and ensure that in future no parking shall be done over the road in the city of the Jabalpur; (d) To pass any other appropriate order or direction under the facts and circumstances which this Honble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the ...
Bhawna Shoorma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
W.P.No.11241 / 2013 (Bhawna Shoorma & others ..Vs..State of M.P.& otheRs.22-07-2013 Shri Adwait Fouadar, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State/respondents. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioneRs.who have obtained degrees through Distant Education Centres in the State of Madhya Pradesh that have been issued by Vinayaka Missions University, Salem and The Global Open University, Nagaland, have filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dated 17-7-2009 and the petitioners have relied upon the order passed by Gwalior Bench of this Court in W.P.No.3290/2012 (Manot Sharma & others versus State of Madhya Pradesh & otheRs.dated 29-8-2012, wherein it has been held that the UGC regulations are prospective. This Court, by a detailed order dated 27-9-2012 passed in the case of Smt. Rashmi Rajak versus Union of India and otheRs.reported in 2012 (4) MPLJ 680 has considered the law as well as the decision of Gwalior Bench and the Supreme Court i...
Bhagwaniya Bai Vs. Hiralal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
Cr.A.No.2570/2011 22.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri R.B.Patel, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Amit Pandey, Government Advocate for the respondent no.2-State. Heard on I.A.No.22054/11, which is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay. As per office note, the appeal is barred by 22 days. Considering the reasons assigned therein, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is, hereby, condoned. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 9/8/11 passed by Sessions Judge, Dindori in Sessions Trial No.80/2009, whereby respondent no.1 has been acquitted. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 5/7/2009 at about 1 a.m., when the prosecutrix was fast asleep, respondent barged into her house by kicking its door open and, thereafter, committed rape on her and when prosecutrix tried to shriek, he threatened...
Jamna Prasad Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
W.P.No.11670 / 2013 (Jamna Prasad Sharma ..Vs..State of M.P.& otheRs.22-07-2013 Shri Narendra Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.appearing for the State/respondents. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition claiming regularization as a regular employee in the establishment of the respondents on the ground that he has been rendering full time service to the respondents though he is engaged as a part time menial and has been doing that work since the last about 18 yeaRs.It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that though the claim of the petitioner was initially rejected on 16-9-2002, however, subsequent to that full time work is being taken from the petitioner and apart from his menial duties he is also entrusted other work by the respondent/department. It is also submitted that the Supdt. of Police, Sehore has on several occasions recommended the petitioner's case for regularization an...
Ku. Lalita Amule Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
W.P.No.11708/2013 Ku. Lalita Amule & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 22.07.2013 Heard Shri S. Mukerjee, the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners have filed this petition being aggrieved by the select list dated 8.10.2012 by the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Balaghat proposing to make appointment of Asha Sahyogi. It is submitted that the said selection has been under taken by the respondents without following the procedure prescribed by law and without issuing any advertisement thereby depriving and precluding the petitioners from participating in the process. Apparently, the matter requires to be looked into by the Collector, Balaghat and in such circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioners approach the respondent no.3 Collector, Balaghat by filing a representation within fifteen days from today alongwith a copy of the order passed today...
Smt. Suman Jaiswal Vs. Santosh Kumar Gupta
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
Cr.A.No.1613/2012 22.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri P.S.Gaharwar, Advocate for the appellant. Shri S.K.Kashyap, Government Advocate for the respondent no.3-State. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment passed by III Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa on 16/7/2010 in Sessions Trial No.262/2008, whereby respondent Nos.1 and 2 namely Santosh Kumar Gupta and Smt.Malti Gupta have been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 302, 341 and 294 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC. for short).By the impugned judgment, they have been convicted under Section 304 Part II read with 34 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I.for 4 years with fine stipulation. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 22/6/80 at about 7.30 p.m., while Ramniwas Soni and Banwarilal were returning from Antrela, against a preexistent water dispute, respondent no.1 abused Banwarilal after w...
Sanjay Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
W.P.No.11806/2013 Sanjay Shrivastava & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 22.07.2013 Heard Shri Vipin Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners who are working as contractual Assistant Project Co-ordinator under the Rajiv Gandhi Prathmik Shiksha Mission at Jila Shiksha Kendra Singrouli, Sidhi and Ashok Nagar respectively by order dated 28.6.2012 initially for a period of one year which was extendable in accordance with the service conditions for contractual employees framed by the Rajiv Gandhi Prathmik Shiksha Mission subject to scrutiny and satisfactory service. It is submitted that subsequently though the rules provide for extension of the period for two yeaRs.the respondent authorities by order dated 28.3.2013 has extended the period only for three months which is contrary to the rules. It is submitted that the petitioners have approached the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bhopal seeking relief of consid...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »