Madhya Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Mittal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
1 W.P. No.4994/2007 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Writ Petition No.4994/2007 PETITIONER : Durga Prasad Dewedi, S/o. Late Sarda Prasad Dewedi, Sarvarahkar Mandir Sita Ram Chandra J.of Village Jhingari, Tehsil Sihora, District Jabalpur (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENTS:1. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Collector, Jabalpur District Jabalpur (M.P.) 2. Sub Divisional Officer Sihora, as Registrar, Public Trust Sihora, District Jabalpur.3. Satayendra Kumar Goutam S/o. Rajkumar Goutam, R/o. Village Jhingari, Tehsil Sihora, District Jabalpur (M.P.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner by Shri S.P. Sharma and Shri M.M.Mudgal, Advocates. Respondents no.1 and 2 by Smt. Divyakirti Bohrey, Panel Lawyer. Respondent no.3 by Shri Devesh Khatri, Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (11.07.2013) The order pass...
Khajuraho Industrial Training Centre Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :10794. OF 201.Khajuraho Industrial Training Centre and another - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh and others Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menot Honble Shri Justice A.K.Sharma ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Anil Khare, Senior Counsel with Shri H.S.Chhabra, for the petitioners. Shri Rahul Jain, learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondent No.1. Shri S. A. Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 to 5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (17-06-2013) Per Rajendra Menot J.1. Petitioner institute has filed this writ petition challenging the orders dated 13-10-2010 and 29-04-2011, passed by the appropriate committees of the National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT) in rejecting the application submitted by the institute for grant of affiliation to the institute for conducting various ...
Smt. Kalawati Singh Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
1 Cr.R. No.269/2011 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL REVISION NO.269/2011 APPLICANTS: Smt. Kalawati Singh and others Versus RESPONDENT: State of Madhya Pradesh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Manish Datt, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Pushpendra Dubey, learned Counsel for the applicant. Shri S.P. Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Order reserved on :05. 07.2013 Order delivered on :23. 07.2013 (ORDER) Being aggrieved by impugned order dated 04.01.2011 passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judges, Satna in Sessions Trial No.64/2010 (State of M.P. through P.S. Rampur Baghelam Vs Smt. Kalawati and other), the accused/petitioners has filed this petition under section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 here- in-after in s...
Prashant Kumar Tekam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
1 W.P No.6348/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6348/2012 PETITIONER : PRASHANT KUMAR TEKAM Vs. RESPONDENTS : STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS. Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. For the petitioner : Shri Vipin Yadav, Advocate. For the State : Shri Piyush Jain, Panel Lawyer. For respondents 2 & 3 : Shri Vivek Rusia, Advocate. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (23/07/2013) The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 5.4.2012 passed by the respondent authorities whereby the contract of service of the petitioner appointing him on contract basis for one year on the post of Manager has been terminated.2. The brief facts, leading to the filing of the present petition, are that the petitioner applied for appointment on the post of Manager on contractual basis for a period of one year pursuant to an advertisement issued by the respondent authorities on 22.1.2007 proposing to fill up backlo...
Makhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.81/2010 Makhan Vs. State of M.P. As Per : G.S.Solanki, J.Shri Raman Patel, Sr. counsel with Shri A.K. Paroha, Advocate for the appellant. Shri A.K. Singh, PL for the respondent/State. ORDER ( /07/2013) 1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant u/s 374 (2) of Cr.P.C being aggrieved by the judgment dated 7/01/2010 passed by learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar in S.T. No.297/07 whereby being convicted u/s 304-B of IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years.2. It is not disputed that deceased Tara Bai was the wife of appellant Makhan and she died unnatural death within 7 years of her marriage on 26/08/2006.3. As per prosecution, it is alleged that marriage of Tara Bai was solemnized with appellant Makhan on 19/06/2006. During marriage ceremony it was told that a motorcycle will be given later on. Since motorcycle was not given by the parents of Tara Bai therefore appellant Makhan ill treated her for...
Motilal S.Tahalramani Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
1 W.P. 4761/2004 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR Single Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA W.P. No.4761/2004 PETITIONERS 1 Motilal S. Tahalramani 2. Jawahar Tahalramani 3. Sunil Tahalramani 4. Dr. Vinot Tahalramani All sons of (Late) Shri S.L. Tahalramani, R/o 115-D, Sant Kanwar Ram Nagar, Bhopal Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Madhya Pradesh through Principal Secretary, Department of Commercial Taxes Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 2. The District Registrar (Registration), Pari Bazar, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. The Sub-Registrar (Registration) Jawahar Chowk, Bhopal (M.P.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioners by - Shri Avinash Zargar, Advocate. Respondents by Shri Vivek Agrawal, Govt. Advocate ORDER ( 23/07/2013) By this petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the validity of the impugned order Annexure P/3 passed by District Registrar, 2 W.P. 4761/2004...
Satyanarayan Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
W.P.No.11732/2013 (Satyanarayan Tiwri versus State of MP and otheRs.23.07.2013 Heard Shri Prakash Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the respondents/authorities have given orders of appointment to the respondents No.5 to 7, who it is alleged, have been placed at serial Nos.63, 64 and 65 in the wait list prepared for making appointment on the post of Assistant Draftsman whereas the petitioner who is at serial No.59, has not been given appointment. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already filed a representation before the authority concerned which is pending decision and therefore, the authority concerned be directed to look into the same and decide it in accordance with law. The learned Government Advocate Shri S.M.Lal, appearing for the State on advance copy submits that the representation of the petitioner ...
Ram Singh Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.2186/1996 Ram Singh Vs. State of M.P. As Per : G.S.Solanki, J.Shri Sandeep Koshta, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Yogendra Das Yadav, PL for the respondent/State. ORDER (23/07/2013) 1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant u/s 374 (2) of Cr.P.C being aggrieved by the judgment dated 28/11/96 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Mandla in S.T. No.146/95 whereby being convicted u/s 376, 506- II of IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years, RI for 1 year with the direction that both the sentences shall run concurrently.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal, in short, are that on 17/07/95 prosecutrix (PW-1) was going in a bus to Dindori for taking her transfer certificate from the school however, at Shahpura appellant Ram Singh also boarded on bus. He abducted the prosecutrix and took her to Amhera where he committed rape on her thereafter, he took her in a hotel at Shahpura and again committed rape on...
Nathu Singh Yadav and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
[1].Criminal Appeal No.257/1997 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.257/1997 Nathu Singh and others versus State of M.P.As Per : G.S.Solanki, J. JUDGMENT [23.7.2013].1) This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C.being aggrieved by conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panna vide order dated 27.1.1997 passed in S.T.No.81/94 whereby appellant No.3 Murat Singh has been convicted under Section 304-II of the IPC and sentenced to R.I.for 7 years and appellant Nos.1 and 2 have been convicted under Sections 304-II/34, 323 of the IPC and sentenced to R.I.for 7 years and R.I.for 6 months.2) The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that on 6.8.1994 at about 12:30 AM in the night, when Bakhat Singh (PW-6) was returning back from the house of Baredi, he was assaulted by appellants Natthu and Chandan Singh by stick. On hearing hue and cry of Bakhat Singh, his father Lalji came on the spot t...
The Chairman, Centre for Interpreneurship Development, Madhya Pradesh ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
W.A.No.799/2012 23.7.2013 Smt.Shobha Menon, learned Senior Advocate with Shri Rahul Choubey, counsel for appellants. Shri D.K.Agarwal, counsel for respondent no.2. Learned counsel for appellants at the outset submitted that in view of the amendment made in the bye-laws registered on 5.7.2012 this appeal has rendered infructuous and she may be permitted to withdraw it. It is also submitted by Smt.Menot that she has filed amendment in the bye-law No.5(d) in W.A.No.690/2012 alongwith an application on 7.9.2012. In view of aforesaid statement made by Smt.Menon, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Subhash Kakade) Acting Chief Justice Judge M....
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »