Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.246/2008 Dhani Ram Dubey Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents-State. Shri S. Pandey, learned Counsel for respondent No.5. ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (31/07/2013) By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, said to be working on the post of Lower Division Clerk in Govt. Post Graduate College, Damoh, has challenged the validity of order dated 30.10.2007 by which his representation made pursuant to the direction issued by this Court in his earlier writ petition, W.P. (S) No.2649/2004 on 05.05.2004, has been rejected. It is contended by the petitioner that initially he was a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.10355/2005 (S) Smt. Anjana Mathur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ Shri Sharad Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents- State. ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (31/07/2013) The petitioner, who was working as Sister Tutor in the Health Services of the Government of Madhya Pradesh, has approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to consider and promote the petitioner on the post of Senior Sister Tutor. It is contended that the petitioner was working on the post of Sister Tutor on which post she was promoted on 29.06.2000. After assuming the duties, she has sincerely, honestly and with devotion ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 Writ Petition No.13099 of 2013 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava Writ Petition No.13099 of 2013 PETITIONER: Bharat Singh S/o Balwant Singh, Aged about 59 years, Cultivator, R/o Village Barkhedi, Tahsil Shyampur, District Sehore (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENT: State of M.P., Through Collector Sehore (M.P.) _________________________________________________ Shri A.S.Jha, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri B.M.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sheetal Dubey, learned Government Advocate for the respondent. ORDER (31.07.2013) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 16.7.2013 passed by First Additional District Judge, Sehore in Misc. Civil Appeal No.19/2013 by which the order dated 30.4.2013 passed by First Civil Judge Class-I,Sehore in Civil Suit No.23-A/13 rejecting the application for temporary injunction of plaintiff/petitioner has been aff...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.3570/2008 Smt. Deman Bai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ None for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondents-State. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned Counsel for respondent No.5. ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (31/07/2013) The petitioner, said to be a candidate for appointment on the post of Aaganwadi Worker, has come before this Court in this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ventilating her grievance against the order dated 07.03.2008 passed by the respondent No.2, Additional Commissioner, Jabalpur Division, Jabalpur, allowing the revision of respondent No.5 and setting aside the order of the Collector, Balaghat, by which the petitioner was directed to be appo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
M.Cr.C.No.3628/2012. 31.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri Yogesh Dhande, Government Advocate for the applicant-State. This application for grant of leave to appeal has been preferred under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 14/11/11 passed by Additional Judge to the Court of I Additional Sessions Judge, Panna, in Sessions Trial No.162/2009, whereby respondent has been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 467 & 468 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC. for short).Prosecution case, in brief is that, respondent Rajesh Dwivedi forged a No Dues Certificate. purporting it to be issued by Madhya Bharat Gramin Bank, Branch Devendra Nagar, for the purpose of cheating State Bank of India, Branch Panna to obtain a loan of Rs.9 lacs, whereas intimation received from Madhya Bharat Gramin Bank indicated that he had outstanding dues amounting to Rs.80,774/- and Rs.53,431/- respectively towards Kisan Credit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Cr.A.No.541/2012 31.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri Aditya Adhikari and Shri Ritwari Parashar, Advocates for the appellant. Shri C.K.Mishra, Government Advocate for the respondent no.1-State. Heard on admission. This appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 20/1/12 passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Sessions Trial No.356/2010, whereby respondent no.2 has been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 366, 376 and 506 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC. for short).Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 17.8.09, at about 2.00 p.m., when the prosecutrix was returning from Howbag College, Jabalpur in a Rickshaw, respondent no.2 Sachin Shrivastava along with his associates Chintu, Ravi, Raman and Shrikant came in a red coloured Bolero Jeep and intercepted the Rickshaw. Alighting from the Jeep, he asked the prosecutrix to marry him and on her denial, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
W.P.No.12163/2013 (Shubham Gour and others versus State of MP and otheRs.31.07.2013 Shri J. Arya, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. Though several issues have been raised by the petitioners in the present petition claiming appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shiksha Grade-I,II, and III on the strength of the fact that they have been working as Guest TeacheRs.the learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at length submits that the present petition be disposed of with a direction to the respondents/authorities to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners as has been done by a Division Bench of this court in W.P.No.9134/13 by order dated 03.06.2013. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.keeping the concept of parity in mind, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioners approach the respondents/authorities by filing...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
M.Cr.C.No.14835/2011. 31.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri Yogesh Dhande, Government Advocate for the applicant-State. This application for grant of leave to file appeal has been preferred under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 10/08/11 passed by Special Judge (under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short the Act.)).in Sessions Trial No.118/2009, whereby respondent has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC. for short) and Section 3(1)(xii) & 3(2)(v) of the Act. As per the prosecution story, on a promise to marry, prosecutrix, a member of Scheduled Tribe, was being persistently subjected to sexual assault by respondent no.1 since December 2005. However, on his denial to marry, report (Ex.P/2) was lodged on 10/12/2008 at Police Station AJK, Hoshangabad. After completion of investigation, charge-she...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
W.P.No.12495/2013 (Rajjan Prasad Dixit versus State of M.P.& Ors.) 31.7.2013 Shri D.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 3. The case of the petitioner is that the respondents No.4 to 7 have encroached upon the Government land for which he has moved an application before the Tahsildar, Panagar, District Jabalpur for removal of the encroachment, but no proper action has been taken and the proceedings are pending before the Tahsildar since 31-5-2012. It is submitted that in spite of order passed by the Collector, Jabalpur in that regard, no appropriate steps have been taken by the respondent No.3, Tahsildar, Panagar, District Jabalpur and the Tahsildar may be directed to decide the proceedings expeditiously. From a perusal of the record, we find that the petitioner before approaching this Court has not approached to the Collector, Jabalpur, respondent No.2 herein, for issuance of directions to the Tah...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Writ Petition No.12826/2013 31.07.2013 Shri S. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner sought following reliefs:- 1. To call for the entire records from the office of the respondents, apropos of proceedings taken while passing the impugned order dated 20.5.2013.2. To quash the order dated 20.5.2013 passed by the Collector, Katni, i.e.respondent no.2.3. To direct the respondents to comply with and implement the order dated 01.03.2013 passed by the State Government.4. To issue any writ, order or direction which may deem fit in the circumstances of the present case. The petitioner is challenging the orders Annexures P-1 and P-3 by which the work of construction of E- Panchyat Bhawans under Bharat Nirman Rajeev Gandhi Sewa Kendra. in most of the Panchyats have been assigned to Rural Engineering Services Division, Katni, which is a Government Agency. After arguing the matter, petitioner seeks withdrawal of this writ petition. Prayer is allowed. This writ petition is dismi...
Tag this Judgment!