Madhya Pradesh Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunder Lal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.597/2006 Sunderlal.Appellant Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh...Respondent ****** Present: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE ****** JUDGMENT (27.6.2013) The following judgment of the Court was delivered by : Ajit Singh, J.The sole appellant Sunderlal has been convicted for an offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.200/- or, in default of payment of fine, three months rigorous imprisonment.2. Victim Baisakhi Bai, aged 75 years, was mother-in-law of the appellant.3. The prosecution case in short is that the appellant was married to Jhanki Bai (P.W.1) many years ago. They also had children from their marriage. But due to bad habits of the appellant, Jhanki Bai left his company and started living with her mother Baisakhi Bai in another village. On 12.7.2005 the appellant went to the house of Baisakhi Bai and insisted Jhanki B...
Rajneesh Kumar Gautam Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
W.P.No.10431/2013 Rajneesh Kumar Gautam vs. Union of India & ORS.1 26.06.2013 Heard Shri Anil Khare, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Som Mishra for the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 7.6.2013 (which it is alleged has not been served upon the petitioner) by which he has been transferred from Jabalpur to Kota as well as order dated 12.6.2013, Annexure P-7, by which he has been sought to be relieved. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that previously the petitioner had been transferred by order dated 12.9.2012 against which he had filed W.P No.15870/2012 in which an interim order was granted and the said petition was ultimately allowed on 14.5.2013 with liberty to the respondents to issue fresh orders of transfer in case administrative exigencies so require in terms of the transfer policy. It is submitted that thereafter the respondents have issued the impugned order dated 7.6.2013 and 12.6.2013 again transferring...
Amber Rajput Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
W.P.No.10246/13 (Amber Rajput versus State of MP and another) 26.06.2013 Heard Shri Praveen Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. Prayer in the petition is to direct the respondent No.2 to appoint the petitioner on the post of Mandi Sachiv Varg A and further to give all consequential and pecuniary benefits to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was selected for the aforesaid post but no further steps are being taken and although a representation is pending but inspite of that no order has been passed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent No.2 along with a copy of the order passed by this court. The respondent No.2 shall do the needful for considering the case of the petitioner in accordance with the merit, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible. Needful be done within a perio...
Smt.Archana Tripathi Vs. Chandrakant Tripathi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.First Appeal No.212/2007 Smt.Archana Tripathi VERSUS Chandrakant Tripathi --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri U.S.Jaiswal, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Luvkush Mishra, Advocate for the respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 18th day of June, 2013) The appellant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Mauganj, District Rewa in Hindu Maintenance case No.3/2005, whereby the application of the appellant under section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter it will be referred to as 'The Act') was dismissed.2. It is admitted that the appellant is wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place in the year 1985 and from marriage since the year 1998, the appellant...
Burn Standard Company Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P.No.16719/2006 Burn Standard Company Limited Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.K.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy. Government Advocate, for the respondents . --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.No.593/2010 Burn Standard Company Limited Versus The State of M.P.and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.K.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy. Government Advocate, for the respondents . --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.No.3887/2005 M/s Samdariya Builders versus The Union of India and others --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------...
The State of M.P. Vs. Atrimuni Pandey
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
Cr.A. No.2571/1997 Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2571 9. 9 7 APPELLANT : State of Madhya Pradesh Versus RESPONDENT : Atrimuni Pandey S/o Sheshmani Pandey, aged 32 years, R/o Tihooli, P.S. Kamarji District Sidhi (MP) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellant /State: Shri Umesh Pandey, Government Advocate For the Respondent : None is present. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing :12. 04.2013 Date of judgment:26. 06.2013 (JUDGMENT) Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 03.09.1997 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sidhi in Criminal Case No.1265 /1996 accused Atrimuni was acquitted from the charge of Section 325 of Indian Penal Code whereby appellant /State filed this appeal under Section 378 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.2. Prosecution case which leads to...
Ajab Singh Vs. Vipat Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
MCC No.732/2013 26.06.2013 Shri K.S.Rajput, Advocate for the applicants. Heard on IA No.6606/13, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The present MCC is filed with a delay of 2 years and 70 days. The reason given by the learned counsel for the applicants in the application is that FA No.227/2010 was dismissed in not compliance to the order dated 23.2.2011. The applicants applied for the certified copy of the order on 31.5.2013 and they received the same on 16.6.2013. Thereafter the present MCC could be filed. No other reason is mentioned for restoration of FA No.227/2010. This is the most awful situation in the case that in FA No.227/2010 the order was passed on 23.2.2011 with a direction that on payment of fresh profess fee along with requisites of registered post within seven days, notice of this admission be issued to the respondent No.2 and ultimately no profess fee was deposited by the learned counsel for the applicants. After keeping silence for more than two yea...
Krishna Kumar Bajpai Vs. Smt. Heera Shukla
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
MCC No.596/2013 26.6.2013 Shri J.L.Mishra, counsel for the applicant. Shri K.S.Baghel, counsel for the respondents No.2. At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard finally. Since the respondent No.2 has no objection, application for restoration filed by the applicant is hereby allowed. F.A.No.1418/2012 is hereby restored. If the applicants furnishes a fresh PF alongwith requisite of registered post within a week then, fresh notices be issued in the appeal as directed earlier in the appeal and case be listed for further proceeding after service of the notices. With the aforesaid directions, the present MCC is hereby disposed off. (N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE Pushpendra...
Vijay Kuamr Upadhyay Vs. the Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :12296. Of 2008 Vijay Kumar Upadhyay V/s Union of India & Others Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. Honble Shri Justice M.A.Siddiqui -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Sharad Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Verma, learned counsel for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER 26.6.2013 Challenging the order dated 22.8.2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Jabalpur in O.A.No.808/2007 rejecting an application filed by the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment, after death of his father, this application has been filed. Petitioner's father late Pramod Kumar Upadhyay was working as driver in the office of Station Engineer, All India Radio, Rewa. He died in harness on 21.1.1996 leaving behind seven members in family including the present peti...
Prani Mitra Samiti Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Writ Appeal No.2509 of 2013 (PIL) 1. Prani Mitra Samiti (Pramisha) a registered Society, Through its Secretary, Dr.Vinay Patel Son of Amrit Lal Patel, aged 39 years, near Shankar Temple, Karakbel, District Narsinghpur (MP) 2. Dr.Vinay Patel, son of Amrit Lal Patel, aged 39 years, Secretary Prani Mitra Samiti, near Shankar Temple, Karakbel, District Narsinghpur (MP) Mobile No.094246-43723 ..Petitioner Versus 1. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal Secretary, Commercial Department, Mantralaya, Bhopal (MP) 2. Excise Commissioner, Moti Mahal Gwalior (MP) 3. Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board Through its Chairman, E-5, Arera Colony, Paryavaran Parisar, Bhopal -462016 PRESENT:- Honble Shri Justice Krishn Kumar Lahoti, Acting Chief Justice Honble Shri Justice M.A.Siddiqui Shri Ravi Nandan Singh, learned senior Advocate with Shri Arpan J.Pawar, for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Kaurav, learned Additional Advocate General for the State...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »