Skip to content

Madhya Pradesh Court May 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 14 2013

Dilip Kanojia Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

Dilip Kanojia versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No :15001. 14. 05.2013. Shri Mrigendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State. Considering the fact that petitioner's deputation to the transport department has already been cancelled in the year 2008-2009 and he is repatriated back to his parent department, in case petitioner has any grievance in the matter and if petitioner feels that due to certain order passed he is entitled to sent on deputation and subsequently absorbed in transport department, petitioner is granted liberty to represent in this regard to the competent authority of the State Government and the competent authority is directed to decide the same in accordance to law within three months. With the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE ss/-...


May 14 2013

Harinarayan Tripathi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

Harinarayan Tripathi versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No :3305. 14. 05.2013. Shri Shashank Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State. Considering the fact that the order of deputation passed and impugned in this writ petition Annexure P-1 dated 26.2.2009 has been stayed by this Court since 1.4.2009 and has not been given effect to, this writ petition is allowed. Order impugned Annexure P-1 dated 26.2.2009 passed by the Collector Tikamgarh is quashed with liberty to the respondents to take action afresh in accordance to law. With the aforesaid liberty to the respondents, the petition stands allowed and disposed of. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE ss/-...


May 14 2013

Smt. Jayanti Pandey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, Higher Education

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

Conc. No.1699 / 2012 (Smt. Jayanti Pandey v. State of M.P.& otheRs.14-05-2013 Shri Umesh Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 to 4. Shri Rahul Choubey, learned counsel for the respondent No.5. The petitioner has filed this application alleging disobedience and contempt of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(S)No.10683/2004, dated 4-2-2010. The respondents have filed a return and stated that the issue is pending decision before the Supreme Court and in view of the order passed therein as an interim measure, 50% of the grant is being released in spite of the fact that the State is not liable to pay pension to such persons as the petitioneRs.It is stated that respondents have already issued orders to the respondent No.5 to forward the claim in accordance with law and the decision of the Supreme Court. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.5 submits that the aforesaid communication was issued by the responde...


May 14 2013

Motilal Sanskrit Hr.Sec.School Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

W.P.No.7626/2008 Moti Lal Sanskrit Higher Secondary School & others vs Madhya Pradesh Sanskrit Board 14/05/2013 None is present for the petitioners even when the matter is called in second round. Shri Abhijeet Bhomik, Advocate for the respondent Board. Shri Lalit Joglekar, Panel Lawyer for the State. This petition is for seeking direction to allow the students of the petitioner's institution to appear in the 10th and 12th Examination conducted by the M.P.Sanskrit Board, which was to commence from 28th of June, 2008. Almost five years have been elapsed. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and due to passage of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is dismissed accordingly. (Subhash Kakade) Judge SJ/-...


May 14 2013

Samandar Singh Kadodiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

WA No.1003 of 2012 WA No.1004 of 2012 WA No.1015 of 2012 WA No.1016 of 2012 WA No.1017 of 2012 WA No.1018 of 2012 WA No.1019 of 2012 WA No.1028 of 2012 WA No.1029 of 2012 WA No.1030 of 2012 WA No.1038 of 2012 WA No.1039 of 2012 WA No.1040 o14. 5.2013. Shri A.M.Trivedi, Sr.cousnel with Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra for the appellants. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari for the respondents. This batch of appeals is arising out of common order dt.17.7.2012 passed by the writ court in WP No.5437/2006(S).WP No.11282/2006(S).WP No.13804/2005(S).WP No.15488/2005(S).WP No.15489/2005(S).WP No.15493/2005(S).WP No.15494/2005(S).WP No.15495/2005(S).WP NO.15496/2005(S) WP No.15498/2005(S).WP No.15500/2005(S).WP No.6626/2006(S).WP No.6627/2006(S).WP No.6628/2006(S) and WP No.7150/2006(S).The learned single Judge has found that the cancellation of the selection process for the post of Jail Warden, Central Jail, Rewa was fully justified as there were serious illegalities and regularities in the selection and while ...


May 14 2013

Natthu Vs. the State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON. SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J.CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1616/2004 Natthu. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Ramesh Tamrakar , Advocate for the applicant. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/ State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on the 14th day of May, 2013) The applicant was convicted for commission of offence under Sections 353, 452 of IPC and sentenced for three months' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.100/- and three months rigorous imprisonment by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panna (Shri Sanjeev Jain) vide judgment dated 22.1.2004 in Criminal Case No.586/2003. In default of payment of fine, he was to undergo additional imprisonment for seven days and fifteen days respectively. In Criminal Appeal No.16/2004, the Additional Sessions Judge, Panna ...


May 14 2013

Surendra Singh Yadav Vs. Ajit Keshari

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

C.P.No.1825/12 14.05.2013 None for the applicant. Record perused. This contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 06.01.2012 in W.P.No.21437/11(S).From a perusal of the return filed by the respondents, it is observed that the respondents, by order dated 14.12.2012 Annexure R/1, have considered and rejected the representation of the applicant in compliance of the order dated 06.01.2012 passed by this court in W.P.No.21437/11 (S) and therefore, no case for initiating the contempt proceedings is made out against the respondents. The contempt petition filed by the applicant is dismissed. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...


May 14 2013

Smt. Rama Tiwari Vs. Shri Rajendra Prasad Dwivedi

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

-1- C.P.No.336/2013 14.5.2013 Shri M.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. G.K.Patel, learned counsel for the respondents. This contempt petition is for willfull disobedience of order dated 4.1.2013 passed in W.P.No.22171/2012. On being noticed the respondents have filed their response wherein it is stated that the representation preferred by the petitioner has been decided on 12.4.2013. In view whereof, no case is made out of willful disobedience by the respondents as would warrant any further proceedings. Furthermore it is apprised at bar that against order dated 12.4.2013, the petitioner has preferred Writ petition No.8131/2013 which has been dismissed on 10.5.2013. In view whereof the proceedings are dropped. Rule NISI discharged. C.c as per rules. (SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE das -2- das...


May 14 2013

Bhuvneshwar Singh Vs. Shri Rajneesh Vaishya

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

C.P.No.1808/12 14.05.2013 Shri Ajeet Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. This contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 11.01.2012 in W.P.No.21850/11(S).The respondents have filed a return along with order Annexure R/1 dated 10.01.2013 by which the respondents have cancelled the order of promotion of other similarly placed persons in view of the order dated 11.01.2012 passed by this court in W.P.No.21850/11 (S) thereby complying with the order passed by this court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the persons who stood reverted on account of order dated 10.01.2013 have filed W.P.No.1239/13 and other petitions which have been allowed and therefore, the applicant be permitted to take up the appropriate proceedings in this regard. In view of the aforesaid facts while I do not find any reason to initiate con...


May 14 2013

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. L.P.Dubey

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

1...W.A.No.55 of 2013 State of M.P.and others L.P.Dubey 14.05.2013 This Order shall decide following Writ Appeals involving similar question of law based on similar set of facts. In all the appeals similar orders are under challenge. Facts are taken from W.A.55 of 2013 for the convenience. W.A.No.55/2013, W.A.No.65/2013, W.A.No.72/2013, W.A.No.79/2013, W.A.No.55/2013, W.A.No.55/2013, W.A.No.55/2013, W.A.No.92/2013, W.A.No.102/2013, W.A.No.103/2013, W.A.No.104/2013, W.A.No.130/2013, W.A.No.131/2013, W.A.No.140/2013, W.A.No.141/2013, W.A.No.147/2013, W.A.No.148/2013 W.A.No.149/2013 W.A.No.150/2013 W.A.No.155/2013 W.A.No.158/2013 W.A.No.187/2013 W.A.No.226/2013 W.A.No.283/2013 W.A.No.353/2013 W.A.No.361/2013 W.A.No.362/2013, W.A.No.363/2013 W.A.No.364/2013 W.A.No.365/2013 W.A.No.366/2013 W.A.No.367/2013 W.A.No.368/2013 W.A.No.369/2013 W.A.No.385/2013 W.A.No.422/2013, W.A.No.423/2013 W.A.No.424/2013 W.A.No.425/2013 W.A.No.219/2013. The writ petition preferred by the respondent for grant of...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial