Madhya Pradesh Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Badri Prasad Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
1 Cr. R. No.1217/2005 HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR BEFORE : TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL. J.CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1217 OF 200.Petitioner : Badri Prasad S/o Baliram Jatav, aged about 25 years, R/o Silpuri P. S. Raisen Teh. And Distt. Raisen Versus. . Respondents : State of M. P. Through P. S. Raisen. For the petitioner : Shri Manot Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the respondent : Smt. Pratibha Mishra P. L. ORDER (Passed on 14.5.2013) 1. The present revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 13.8.2005 passed by the Special Judge, Raisen in Criminal Appeal No.42/2005 affirming the conviction and sentence of the petitioner awarded by the trial Court vide judgment dated 18.1.2005 in regular Criminal Case No.62/2003, by which the petitioner was convicted under Section 456 of IPC and sentenced to six months RI and with fine of Rs.100/- and under Section 354 of IPC he was sentenced to six months RI.2. According to prosecution, in the intervening night of 30-31 of March, 2003...
Manish Vasunia Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
WA No.1003 of 2012 WA No.1004 of 2012 WA No.1015 of 2012 WA No.1016 of 2012 WA No.1017 of 2012 WA No.1018 of 2012 WA No.1019 of 2012 WA No.1028 of 2012 WA No.1029 of 2012 WA No.1030 of 2012 WA No.1038 of 2012 WA No.1039 of 2012 WA No.1040 o14. 5.2013. Shri A.M.Trivedi, Sr.cousnel with Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra for the appellants. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari for the respondents. This batch of appeals is arising out of common order dt.17.7.2012 passed by the writ court in WP No.5437/2006(S).WP No.11282/2006(S).WP No.13804/2005(S).WP No.15488/2005(S).WP No.15489/2005(S).WP No.15493/2005(S).WP No.15494/2005(S).WP No.15495/2005(S).WP NO.15496/2005(S) WP No.15498/2005(S).WP No.15500/2005(S).WP No.6626/2006(S).WP No.6627/2006(S).WP No.6628/2006(S) and WP No.7150/2006(S).The learned single Judge has found that the cancellation of the selection process for the post of Jail Warden, Central Jail, Rewa was fully justified as there were serious illegalities and regularities in the selection and while ...
Bhagwandas Rajak Vs. Shri Kamal Singh Kushwaha
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
C.P.No.1824/12 14.05.2013 Smt. Sudha Gautam, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. This contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 14.05.2012 in W.P.No.7325/12(S).From a perusal of the return filed by the respondents, it is observed that the respondents, by order dated 30.09.2012 Annexure R/2, have considered and rejected the claim of the applicant in compliance of the order dated 14.05.2012 passed by this court in W.P.No.7325/12(S) and therefore, no case for initiating the contempt proceedings is made out against the respondents. The contempt petition filed by the applicant is dismissed. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
ishwar Prasad Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
(1) Cr.A.No.841/1998 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH:JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.841/1998 Ishwar Prasad, son of Sevaram Lodhi aged about 20 years, resident of village Tapakia, P.S. Chargawan, Teh. Patan District Jabalpur. .........Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh through P.S. Chargawan, District Jabalpur. ......Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the appellant: Shri Mukesh Pandey, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Umesh Pandey, Govt. Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ******* JUDGMENT (14.05.2013) Appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 31st March, 1998 passed by VII Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Sessions Trial No.83/97 convicting him under section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for two years.2....
Dilip Pawar Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON. SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J.CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1665/2004 Dilip S/o Savanya Pawar. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Pramod Thakre , Advocate for the applicant. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/ State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on the 14th day of May, 2013) The applicant was convicted for commission of offence under Sections 341, 354 of IPC and sentenced for six months' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/- and one month's simple imprisonment by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Multai District Betul (Shri Prakash Chandra) vide judgment dated 26.7.2004 in Criminal Case No.906/2001. In default of payment of fine, he was to undergo additional imprisonment for one month. In Criminal Appeal No.70/2004, the Additional Sessions Judge, Multai ...
Anirudh Saini Vs. Piyush Agrawal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
1 Cr.R. No.367/2011 & 468/2011 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON. SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J CRIMINAL REVISION NO.367/2011 Anirudh Saini. -Vs- Piyush Agrawal. CRIMINAL REVISION NO.468/2011 Piyush Agrawal. -Vs- Anirudh Saini. In Cr.R.No.367/2011 Shri Anil Khare, Sr. Advocate with Shri Harjeet Singh Chhabra, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, Advocate for the respondent. In Cr.R.No.468/2011 Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Anil Khare, Sr. Advocate with Shri Harjeet Singh Chhabra, Advocate for the respondent. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 14th day of May, 2013) These two criminal revisions arose from the judgment dated 4.2.2011 passed by the Additional Judge to the First Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.317/2009, and therefore both these revisions are decided by the common order.2. Applicant Anirudh Saini (herein after he would be referred as...
Ambika Singh Vs. Shri Manish Shrivastava
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
C.P.No.1628/12 14.05.2013 Shri A.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri J.K.Pillai, learned counsel for the respondents No.3 and 4. Heard. This contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 22.06.2012 in W.P.No.3554/09(S).The learned counsel for the respondents No.3 and 4 submits that though the order for disbursement of a sum of Rs.45080/- has already been issued but on account of certain technical problems the amount has not been disbursed by the Bank to the respondents No.3 and 4 to enable them to disbuRs.the same to the applicant. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the applicant is entitled to the the said amount, it is directed that the respondents No.3 and 4 shall disbuRs.the same to the applicant positively within two weeks failing which the applicant would be at liberty to point out the lapse on the part of the respondents No.3 and 4 and in case the applicant does so this court ...
D.S.Rajput Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
D.S.Rajput versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No :11870. / 2008 (s) 14.05.2013. Shri Uttam Maheshwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State. Keeping in view the order dated 20.10.2008 passed by this Court and order of modification dated 20.11.2008 at the instance of intervener represented by Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel this petition is disposed of granting liberty to the State Government to take fresh action in accordance to liberty under the changed circumstances and in the present set of situation. With the aforesaid the petition stands allowed and disposed of. The impugned order stands modified in view of above and fresh action to be taken. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE ss/-...
Rajesh Awasthi Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
Rajesh Awasthi versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.10587 / 2009 (s) 14.5.2013: Shri V.C.Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner. Challenging the order Annexure P-8 dated 17.1.2008, passed by respondent No.4 accepting an application for voluntary retirement submitted by petitioner on 14.11.2007, petitioner has filed this writ petition. Petitioner was working as a Sub Inspector (M) in the Special Branch at Police Head Quarters Bhopal. On various ground, contending that he has been harassed, records indicate that petitioner submitted an application for voluntary retirement. This was accepted and he was relieved. However, subsequently contending that he had submitted the application under pressure and duress he sought for permission to withdraw the application. However this was refused on the ground that he has already retired and the application cannot be accepted. From the records it is seen that the application of the petitioner for voluntary retirement was accepted on 17.1.2008 ...
Alok More Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
WA No.1003 of 2012 WA No.1004 of 2012 WA No.1015 of 2012 WA No.1016 of 2012 WA No.1017 of 2012 WA No.1018 of 2012 WA No.1019 of 2012 WA No.1028 of 2012 WA No.1029 of 2012 WA No.1030 of 2012 WA No.1038 of 2012 WA No.1039 of 2012 WA No.1040 o14. 5.2013. Shri A.M.Trivedi, Sr.cousnel with Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra for the appellants. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari for the respondents. This batch of appeals is arising out of common order dt.17.7.2012 passed by the writ court in WP No.5437/2006(S).WP No.11282/2006(S).WP No.13804/2005(S).WP No.15488/2005(S).WP No.15489/2005(S).WP No.15493/2005(S).WP No.15494/2005(S).WP No.15495/2005(S).WP NO.15496/2005(S) WP No.15498/2005(S).WP No.15500/2005(S).WP No.6626/2006(S).WP No.6627/2006(S).WP No.6628/2006(S) and WP No.7150/2006(S).The learned single Judge has found that the cancellation of the selection process for the post of Jail Warden, Central Jail, Rewa was fully justified as there were serious illegalities and regularities in the selection and while ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »