Madhya Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sitaram Manav Dangi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.2902 OF 201.Shri Sitaram Manav Dangi Petitioner versus State of M. P. and others Respondents Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra MeNo........................................................................................................... Shri Vinay Sharma for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1/State and respondent No.3 the Collector. Shri Vikram Singh for respondent No.2. .................................................................................................. ORDER (2/04/13) As per Rajendra Menon, J:- Petitioner who is 88 years of age and whose claim for grant of 'Samman Nidhi' under a scheme formulated by the State Govt. having been rejected, has filed this writ petition and this is the 3rd round of litigation in the matter.2. Petitioner's claim is that he is a freedom fighter, had participated in the freedom movement in the then existing State of Orchha not in t...
Ravi Narayan Dahiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C. No.213/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Shakti Prakash Pandey, counsel for the applicant. Shri C.K.Mishra, GA, for the respondent/State. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.515/12 registered at Police Station Panagar District Jabalpur for offence punishable under Sections 304(B).498-A, 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He has no criminal past. He is the husband of deceased Kavita, who is said to have been died unnatural death within seven years of her marriage. The applicant is in jail since 14.10.2012 and still charge has not been framed. Trial would considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. Learned counsel for the State has objected the prayer for grant of bail. I have perused the case diary. The applicant is the husband of d...
Suresh Patil Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
1 Cr.R. No.2149 of 2009 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON'BLE SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J CRIMINAL REVISION NO.2149/2009 Suresh Patil. -Vs- State of Madhya Pradesh. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Vivek Rusia, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent- State. Shri Ishteyaq Husain, Advocate for the objector. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 2nd day of April, 2013) This criminal revision has been preferred by the applicant against the order dated 30.11.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Burhanpur in ST No.154/2009, whereby the charges of offence punishable under Sections 120-B, 420 and 409 of IPC were framed against the applicant.2. The brief facts of the case relating to the present revision are that being a partner in a partnership firm M/s Shree Shai Developers. the applicant obtained some propert...
Kalawati @ Kala Bai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3883/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Naresh Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 3.3.2013 in connection with Crime No.72/2013 registered at P.S.Kundipura, District Chhindwara for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P.Excise Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a lady, she has been falsely implicated in the case. She is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, she be released on bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that applicant is a lady, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without exp...
K.P.Bhumarkar Vs. Satate of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
CRR No.29/2009 Criminal Revision No.29/2009 2.4.2013 Shri V.C.Rai, counsel for the applicants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. Shri Mohanlal Sharma, counsel for the objector. Heard the learned counsel for the parties finally. The applicants have challenged the order dated 11.12.2008 passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad in S.T.No.215/2007, whereby the application under section 197 of the Cr.P.C.filed by the applicants was dismissed. The prosecution's case, in short, is that, a prosecution for offence punishable under section 452, 294, 506 read with section 34 of IPC was going on against the applicants. The applicants have moved an application under section 197 of the Cr.P.C.that they were the public servants and therefore, without any sanction of prosecution, no prosecution could proceed against the applicants and therefore, it was prayed that the prosecution may be dropped. After considering the submissions made by learned couns...
Ajjoo @ Ajay Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C.No.2567/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Prashant Kohade, counsel for the applicant. Shri A.K.Singh, GA, for the State. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant is in custody since 16.8.2012 in connection with Crime No.625/2012 registered at Police Station Sihora, District Jabalpur for offence punishable under Sections 457, 380 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. The applicant is in jail and trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The application is allowed. It is directed th...
Smt. Geeta Kori Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
W.P.No.5730/2013 2.4.2013 Shri P.S.Tomar, counsel for petitioner. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy.G.A., for respondents. The petitioner has sought following reliefs in this petition :- (i) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 and 3 to produce the son of the petitioner namely Vijendra @ Monu Kori before this Hon'ble Court and give an explanation regarding this illegal detention of her son. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to fairly investigate into the matter and take necessary action against such illegal act of the respondent no.4. (iii) Any other relief/order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be given to the petitioner along with the cost of petition, in the interest of justice. The learned counsel for petitioner at the outset submitted that the petitioner's son Vijendra was infact arrested on 20.3.2013 by the Police Moti Nagar, Sagar, and this petition was filed on 25.3.2013 itself at 1.00 P.M.A...
Devraj Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
Criminal Revision No.114/2011 02.04.2013 Shri Shivam Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Heard the learned counsel for the parties finally. By this Criminal Revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C.the applicant has challenged the order dated 19.11.2010 passed by the learned Special Judge NDPS Act Rewa in Special Case No.7/2009 whereby the charge of offence punishable under Section 20(B)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act was framed against the applicant. The prosecution's case, in short, is that some contraband substance was recovered from the vehicle bearing registration not MP20 HA3606 and it was found that the vehicle was not registered as a taxi. The applicant is registered owner of the vehicle. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the applicant takes the advantage of the statement given by one Sangram Singh that the vehicle...
Ansh Chugh Vs. Barkatullah Vishwavidyalaya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
W.P.No.4655 o2. 4.2013. Shri Aditya Sanghi for the petitioneRs.Shri Mahendra Pateria for the respondent No.1. Petitioners have sought the following relief : (i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.1- Barkatullah University to accept the examination forms of the petitioners and permit them to appear in the MBBS Second Professional Examination scheduled from 16.3.2013. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.1- Barkatullah University to declare the result of the petitioners of the MBBS Second Professional Examination along with the main batch students. o direct the respondent No.4 to decide the appeal at the earlier. (iii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (iv) Cost of the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset, submitted that so ...
Dilip Malviya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3740/2013 2.4.2013 Shri B.P.Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. Admit. Call for the case diary. Heard on I.A.No.6887/2013, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant. The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.10/2013 registered at P.S.Malajkhand, District Balaghat, for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 506-II/34 of the IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He is husband of complainant Sarika. Initially, the complainant filed an application for maintenance, thereafter, applicant filed a divorce petition against the complainant in the Family Court Bandra, Mumbai and as a counter blast of the same, the complainant lodged false and concocted report against the applicant. Counsel has further submitted that it is a matrimonial matter, in the event of arrest, the chances of comprom...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »