Madhya Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramashraya Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
W.P.No.6742/13 (s) 29/04/13 Shri S.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Shri R.P.Agrawal, learned Sr.Counsel with Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Against the order passed by the Collector under Section 247 of the M.P.L.R.C., petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal under Section 242, Second Appeal and Revision under Section 50 and, therefore, the petition directly before this Court by-passing a three tier remedy is not permissible. Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.to the remedy available under the M.P.L.R.C., this petition is disposed of. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Vy/-...
Preetam Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
Cr.R.No.389/2013 29.04.2013 Shri Manish Datt, Senior counsel with Shri Nishant Datt, counsel for the applicant. Shri Pushpraj Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard on question of admission. Petition seems to be arguable, hence admitted for final hearing. Learned counsel for the State takes notice of this admission. Record of the Courts below has already been requisitioned. Also heard on IA No.5161/2013, an application for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail. The applicant has been convicted under Section498-A of IPC and sentenced to undergo SI for 1 year and fine of Rs.5,000/-, with default stipulations. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail. He has been falsely implicated. He further submits that during trial and after dismissal of the appeal, in all, the applicant has already suffered the jail sentence of about 2 months and 10 days. Revision would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for suspension of jail sente...
Dhanraj Puri @ Mahant Dhanraj Giri Vs. Registrar Public Trush
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
Writ Petition No ::7566. / 2012 Dhanraj Puri versus Registrar, Public Trust and another 29.04.2013. Shri Sidharth Gulati for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, PL, for respondent No.1. Shri Vishal Dhagat for respondent No.2. Challenging an interlocutory order-dated 9.5.2012 Annexure P/6 passed by the District Judge, Hoshangabad, rejecting an objection filed by the petitioner under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this writ petition has been filed. Respondent No.2 - a Registered Society, filed a complaint before the Registrar, Public Trust with regard to the working of the petitioner as Sarvakar, in the temple in question. The Registrar after conducting certain inquiry under section 26 referred the matter to the District Judge under section 27 of the MP Public Trust Act and in the said proceedings, impleaded respondent No.2 as a party. Interalia contending that in a proceeding to be held under section 27 of the MP Trust Act, no outsider other than the Trustees of the registe...
Prembai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
W.A.No.369/2011 29.04.2013 Shri A.K.Jain, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Jaideep Singh, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for the respondents-State. After perusal of the affidavit filed by the State, dated 30th January, 2013 we find it appropriate to direct the respondents to produce the file in which the appellant was appointed vide Annexure-P/7, dated 8-11-2000, because at the relevant time the appellant was Class-III passed and whether as per clause (6) of the Scheme of appointment of Anganwadi WorkeRs.Annexure-P/10, dated 6-01-2000, the appellant was entitled to be appointed as an Anganwadi Worker ?. The record be produced before this Court on the next date of hearing. Be listed for hearing on 19-6-2013. A typed copy of this order be supplied to the learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for compliance. C.c.as per rules. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) Acting Chief Justice Judge ac....
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Arun
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
Cr.R.No.191/2013 29.4.2013 Shri A.K.Singh, GA for the State. None for the respondent. This revision petition has been filed by the State being aggrieved by order dated 16.11.2012 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sessions Division, Katni to the Court of FiRs.Additional Sessions Judge, Katni in Criminal Revision No.203/2012 whereby the revision filed by the respondent has been allowed and the order dated 1.11.2012 passed by JMFC has been set aside and the vehicle of the respondent has been directed to be released on bail. The facts, in short, giving rise to this revision petition are that the on 25.20.2012 at about 9:30 AM, Sub-Inspector (Excise).Slimnabad Circle, received a secret information in regard to transporting of illicit liquor. In order to verify the aforesaid information, the Police intercepted Vehicle MP-20T/5650 on Bandhi tiraha, Slimnabad and on search, it was found that accused Rajjan Raikwar was transporting 650 quarters bearing 180 ml country made liquor each. He was...
Shankhdhar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
W.P.No.3683/13 29/04/13 Shri D.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Shri R.P.Agrawal, learned Sr.Counsel with Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Against the order passed by the Collector under Section 247 of the M.P.L.R.C., petitioners have a remedy of filing an appeal under Section 242, Second Appeal and Revision under Section 50 and, therefore, the petition directly before this Court by-passing a three tier remedy is not permissible. Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioners to take recouRs.to the remedy available under the M.P.L.R.C., this petition is disposed of. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Vy/-...
Mal Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
1 Cr. Rev. No.295/2013/200 29.04.2013 Shri Amit Dubey, counsel for the applicant. Shri Pushpraj Singh, PL for the State. Heard. This Criminal Revision under Section 397/401 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicant being aggrieved by judgment dated 11.2.2013 delivered by Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Burhanpur in Criminal Appeal No.75/2012 whereby the appeal of the applicant has been dismissed and conviction and sentence recorded by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Burhanpur vide Judgment dated 17.5.2012 in Criminal Case No.1903/2007, has been affirmed wherein applicant was convicted under Section 304-A of IPC and Section 3/181 of Motor Vehicle Act and sentenced him to undergo RI for 1 year and fine of Rs. 1,000/- and fine of Rs. 500/- respectively, with default stipulations.2. Facts, in short, giving rise to this revision petition are that on 18.6.2007 at about 22.25, a Patrolling Party of Police found that applicant along with two persons Muneem and...
Mahadev Prasad Chouksey Vs. Gulshan Bawra
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
1 Conc. No.983/2012 29/4/2013: Shri J.L.Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned counsel for the respondents. From the documents and material produced by Shri S.S.Bisen, learned counsel for the respondents, it is seen that in Claim Case No.4/A-82/11-12 - Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bhedaghat versus Mahadev Prasad Chouksey award has been passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on 24.4.2013 awarding a total compensation of Rs.3,81,682/- which include interest of Rs.1,01,951/- calculated at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of acquisition till payment. Keeping in view the compliance not reported by Shri S.S.Bisen, no further action is required to be taken in the matter. Accordingly, respondents are discharged from the proceedings and the application disposed of. c.c.as per rules. ( Rajendra MeNo.) Judge Mrs.mishra...
VipIn Chourasia Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
W.P.No.6683/13 29/04/13 Shri D.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Shri R.P.Agrawal, learned Sr.Counsel with Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Against the order passed by the Collector under Section 247 of the M.P.L.R.C., petitioners have a remedy of filing an appeal under Section 242, Second Appeal and Revision under Section 50 and, therefore, the petition directly before this Court by-passing a three tier remedy is not permissible. Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioners to take recouRs.to the remedy available under the M.P.L.R.C., this petition is disposed of. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Vy/-...
Surendra Kumar Pandey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
W.P.No.6747/13 (s) 29/04/13 Shri S.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Shri R.P.Agrawal, learned Sr.Counsel with Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Against the order passed by the Collector under Section 247 of the M.P.L.R.C., petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal under Section 242, Second Appeal and Revision under Section 50 and, therefore, the petition directly before this Court by-passing a three tier remedy is not permissible. Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.to the remedy available under the M.P.L.R.C., this petition is disposed of. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Vy/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »