Madhya Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gulam Ahmad Vs. Municipal Corporation Singrouli
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
C.R.No.356/2012 (Gulam Ahmed and another versus Municipal Corporation and otheRs.16.04.2013 Shri A.K.Pathak, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Mukesh Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. The applicants have filed this revision being aggrieved by order dated 11.05.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge, Baidhan in Civil Appeal No.74-A/2011 whereby the application for condonation of delay filed by the respondents has been allowed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the appeal filed by the respondents before the FiRs.Appellate Court was barred by 23 days and inspite of absence of the application for condonation of delay, the fiRs.appellate court passed the interim order, being aggrieved by which the present applicants had filed W.P.No.13233/2011 which was disposed of on 24.02.2012 with a direction to the court below to fiRs.decide the application for condonation of delay and thereafter take up other issues. Pursuant to the order pas...
Smt. Farida Bano Vs. Noor Mohammad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
Criminal Revision No.1233/2010 Criminal Revision No.1312/2010 16.04.2013 Shri S.A.Wakil, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Heard on the question of admission. Since the impugned order in both the cases is the similar, therefore both the applications are decided by a common order. The applicants have challenged the order dated 6.4.2010 passed by the learned JMFC Chhindwara (Smt. Sangeeta Yadav) in Criminal Case No.867/2010 whereby the complaint was registered against the applicants for commission of offence punishable under Sections 452, 294, 506- B, 323 and 386 of IPC, whereas the complaint was dismissed for the offence punishable under Sections 450, 395 and 397 of IPC. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant had lodged a complaint against the applicants that on 21.10.2001 when the victim was residing in the house situated at Village Damua, the applicants came inside the house and asked that they were directed to take t...
Smt.Pushparani Dana and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
1 M.Cr.C.No.1027/2005 M.Cr.C.No.1027/2005 16.04.2013 Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Shri Pramod Chaurasiya, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. None for respondent no.2. Present petition has been preferred against the order dated 20/12/2004 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Criminal Revision No.145/2004 affirming the order 30/04/2004 of trial court framing charges against the petitioners under section 498A/34 IPC. Facts of the case in short are that on 04/11/2003 respondent no.2 lodged a report at police station Ranjhi, Jabalpur at Crime No.575/2003 under section 498A/34 IPC against the petitioners alleging that on 01/11/2003 at about 8.00 pm, petitioners asked and forced her to leave her matrimonial house just after 13th day of death of her husband. Petitioner no.1 was the mother, petitioner no.2 and 4 were the brothers and petitioner no.3 and 5 were the sister-in-laws of her deceased husband. Husband of respondent no.2 died of old ailment on 1...
Ajju @ Ajay Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3025/2013 16/04/2013 Shri Y.K.Gupta, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Vivek Lakhera, PL for the respondent/State. Heard finally. This is the fiRs.application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 13/12/12 in connection with Crime No.760/2012 registered at P.S.City Kotwali, District Damoh for the offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC read with section 34 (2) of Excise Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant. Learned counsel for the State opposes the application. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the nature of allegation made against this applicant, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release him on bail. Therefore, without commenting o...
Ajay Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3121/2013 16/04/2013 Shri Anuj Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Vivek Lakhera, PL for the respondent/State. Heard finally. This is the fiRs.application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 5/11/12 in connection with Crime No.771/12 registered at P.S.Kotwali, District Sehore for the offence punishable under sections 294, 306 of IPC. As per prosecution, it is alleged that this applicant and his mother quarreled with deceased Rakhi with regard to blockage in the drain therefore, she committed suicide by setting herself on fire. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted that Rakhi was upset and she committed suicide due to depression therefore, no ingredient u/s 107 of IPC is found in this case. The similarly placed co-accused Smt. Kamla Bai has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 5/02/2013 passed in M.Cr.C...
Madan Lal Vohra Vs. Smt. Nirmala Dubey
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. C.R.No.20/2013 Modan Lal Vohra and otheRs.Vs Smt. Nirmala Dubey. PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri M.L.Patellearned counsel for the applicants (Non-applicants before RCA).Shri D.K.Dixit, learned counsel for respondent (Applicant before RCA) ORDER (16.4.2013) This revision under Section 23-E(2) of the M.P.Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for brevity) has been filed seeking to challenge order dated 17.12.2012 passed in Case No.2-A/6/2011-2012 by the Rent Controlling Authority, Betul (hereinafter referred to as the RCA for short).2: Facts giving rise to filing of this revision are that the respondent claiming herself to be a specified landlord as defined under the Act, made an application under Section 23-A of the Act, seeking eviction of the applicants. It was stated that the respondent was a widow. Her late husband has obtained a lease of the land from the State Government and constructed a small ...
Awadhesh Pratap Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.1526/2011 Awdhesh Pratap Singh and another VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Sankalp Kochar, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 16th day of April, 2013) The applicants have preferred the present revision against the judgment dated 9.8.2011 passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in criminal appeal No.135/2010, whereby the matter was remanded to the trial Court for retrial of the case, whereas the applicants were convicted for the offence punishable under section 304- A of IPC and section 5 (3) (a) of Indian Explosive Act, 1984, vide judgment dated 12.7.2010 passed by the learned JMFC, Chhatarpur (Shri Rajesh Devaliya) in c...
Ku. Tarannum Jahan Vs. Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya Jabalpur
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
WP 6662.13 Writ Petition No.6662 of 2013 (Ku. Tarannum Jahan versus Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya, Jabalpur and another) 16-04-2013 Shri Vijay Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on admission. Petitioner, having Master of Science Degree in Zoology is irked by the advertisement dated 25-10-2012 inviting applications for appointment in the backlog vacancies of Technical Assistant Bioscience carrying pay scale of Rs.9300-34800 + 4200. Grievance of the petitioner is in respect of qualification. It is urged that in the discipline of Bioscience instead of including all the subjects under the canopy of Bio-science, such as Zoology, Bio-technology, Microbiology, Bio-chemistry for appointment of Technical Assistant, the respondents have arbitrarily confined the recruitment only amongst those who are M.Sc./Ph.D.in Botany, Bio-Informatics/Instrumentation. It is however not disclosed in the petition that the Research Assistant Bio-science is required in the stream covering Zoo...
Suresh and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH Criminal Appeal No.1541/2003 1. Suresh, s/o Khemlal Yadav, aged about 30 years.2. Ashok, s/o Khemlal Yadav, aged about 27 years.3. Naresh, s/o Khemlal Yadav, aged about 24 years. All residents of Jamunjhiri, P.S. Kotwali, District Chhindwara, M.P. Versus State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellants: Shri Ramesh Tamrakar, Advocate. For the State: Shri Amit Pandey, Panel Lawyer. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing:16. 04/2013 Date of Judgment:16. 04/2013 JUDGMENT Per: Rakesh Saksena, J.Appellants ha...
Ram Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No.18423/2010 Ram Kumar.....Petitioner Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.Respondents For the petitioner : Shri A. K. Mishra, Advocate. For respondent : Shri Vivek Agrawal, Government Advocate. Nos. 1,3 and 4. For respondent : Shri Rahul Rawat, Advocate. No.7. ****** Present: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH ****** ORDER (16.4.2013) The following order of the Court was delivered by : Ajit Singh, J.By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the election of respondent no.7 Mohan Singh to Janpad Panchayat, Anuppur as Member and Vice President.2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner is a resident of Village Lohasur, District Anuppur. His name also appears in the voter list at Serial No.714, Janpand Panchayat, Anuppur. Respondent no.7 has been convicted for offences under sections 302/149, 307/149 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life and 10 years vide judgment dated ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »