Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bholu Singh Tomar Vs. Sanjay Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
Conc. No. 1584 Of 2012 19.3.2013 Shri Narendra Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Prashant Singh, learned counsel for respondents. Heard. After 8 years of disposal of a petition, W.P. No. 9035/2004) (disposed of on 29.9.2004), the petitioner has filed this petition seeking action against respondents for noncompliance of said order. No cogent explanation has been given as to why no action was initiated by the petitioner for alleged non compliance. The latches, in the given facts of present case, would be a sufficient ground to dismiss the petition and drop the proceedings. However, in pursuance to notice issued to respondents they have filed a compliance report stating therein that a detailed speaking order has been passed on 30.11.2012; whereby, claim of the petitioner for grant of regular pay scale from initial date of appointment as per as p...
Karan Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE VIMLA JAIN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1781/2002 Karan S/o Chhatan Gond Aged about 24 years Occupation Conductor R/o Village Behadidhana at present Ghodadongri District Betul (MP) Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh Through Police Station Sarani District Betul (MP) Respondent --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Smt.Durgesh Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Umesh Pandey, Government Advocate for the State. Date of hearing :7. 3.2013 Date of judgment:19. 3.2013 (JUDGMENT ) Per: Vimla Jain, J Appellant Karan preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment dated 8.6.2002 passed by 2nd 2 Additional Sessions Judge, Betul in Sessions Trial No.31/02, whereby he had been convicted and sentenced with the direction to run all the sentences concurrently as under:- Pro...
Hiralal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
M.Cr.C.No.189/2013 19.3.2013 Shri Vikas Mahavar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Chandrakant Mishra, PL for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 5.11.2012 in connection with Crime No.18/2012 registered at P.S.Raj Nagar, District Chhatarpur for the offence punishable under sections 307, 294, 506-B and 336 read with 34 of the IPC and 25/27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. Co-accused Prem Chand has already been released on bail. The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. I have perused the case diary. There is direct allegation against the applicant that he fired on Sarju, who sustained gunshot injuries. In these circumstances, I do not find it a fit case to relea...
Smt. Malkho Bai Th:lrs Smt. Kanta Sharma Vs. Sunita Burman
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
W.P. No. 3159 Of 2013 19.3.2013 Shri P.C. Batri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. Orders dated 22.11.2012 and 2.1.2013 passed by 9th Civil Judge, Class II, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 26 A/2012 are bing assailed vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Suit at the instance of petitioner is for eviction and arrears of rent against the respondent. When the proceeding had reached to the stage of final hearing, petitioner filed an application under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave of the Court to produce certain documents. Trial Court taking into consideration the fact that the matter has traveled various stages and reached the stage of final hearing and at the intervening stage no efforts were made by the petitioner/plaintiff to file the document and for non filing of the same no explanation has been tendere...
Sanju and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
1 Cr.A.No.34/1997 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR AFR Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Saksena Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Jain CRIMINAL APPEAL No.34/1997 1. Sanju son of Girdharilal Gharwal,aged 21 years, resident of Malviyaganj Itarsi, district Hoshangabad.2. Sheru @ Narendra son of Shri Lalgiri Goswamy, aged 19 years, resident of Malviyaganj Itarsi, District Hoshangabad. ....Appellants -Versus- State of Madhya Pradesh through P.S.Itarsi-Nagar, district Hoshangabad M.P. ....Respondent ---------------------------------------------------- For the appellants: Shri S.K.Gangrade,Advocate with Ku.Anita Kaithwas,Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Amit Pandey, Panel Lawyer. ---------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing:07. 03/2013 Date of Judgment:19. 03/2013 ********** JUDGMENT Per: Rakesh Saksena,J.Appellants have filed this appeal against the judgment dated 26.12.1996 passed by I Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad in Sessions Trial No.105/1995 c...
Ramswaroop Tiwari Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE VIMLA JAIN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.197/2004 1.Ramswaroop Tiwari S/o Jageshwar Aged 25 years 2.Vijay Bahadur Tiwari S/o Jageshwar Aged 21 years 3.Chhota alias Ramshankar Tiwari S/o Jageshwar Aged 18 years All R/o Village Barband Police Station Goyra District Chhatarpur (MP) Appellants Versus State of Madhya Pradesh Police Station Goyra District Chhatarpur (MP) Respondent --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Jitendra Dixit, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Amit Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State. Date of hearing :5. 3.2013 Date of judgment:19. 3.2013 2 JUDGMENT Per: Vimla Jain, J Appellants preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment dated 24.12.2003 passed by 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in Sessions Trial No.144/1998, whereby each of the app...
Kamal Prasad Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Revision No.41/1997 Kamla Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Ashok Lalwani, counsel for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on 19th day of March, 2013) The applicant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 7(1)/16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [hereinafter it would be referred to as the P.F. Act.]. vide judgment dated 21.6.1988 passed by the learned A.C.J.M. Katni in criminal case no.1916/82 and sentenced for six months' R.I. with fine of `1,000/-. In criminal appe...
M.P.S.E.B. and ors Vs. Ramlal Vishwakarma and ors
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
F.A. No.207/2004 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava F.A. No.207/2004 APPELLANTS 1 M.P. State Electricity Board Head Defendants Office, Rampur, Jabalpur through 2. Executive Engineer, M.P. State Electricity Board, Rewa, Office at Sirmour Chouraha, Rewa -Versus- RESPONDENTS:1. Ramlal Vishwakarma s/o Ram Sundar Plaintiffs 1 & 2 Vishwakarma 2. Smt. Vidhyawati w/o Ramlal Vishwakarma Both are R/o village Chourgadi, Teh Raipur, Kachuliyan, Distt. Rewa (M.P.) 3. Gramin Vidyut Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Rewa through Managing Director, Gramin Vidyut Sahkari Samiti Rewa ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate with Shri K.K. Gautam, Advocate for the appellants. Shri S.P. Mishra, Advocate for the respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT {19032013} Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated ...
Mahesh Singh Parihar Vs. Arvind Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
WP No.1073.13 Writ Petition No.1073 of 2013 (Mahesh Singh Parihar versus Arvind Kumar) 19-03-2013 Shri Saurabh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pranay Verma, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard. Order dated 10-01-2013 passed by Second Civil Judge Class-II, Khurai, District-Sagar, in an Execution Case is being assailed vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Vide impugned order, the Executing Court while negativing the objection raised by petitioner directed for issuance possession of .14 dismissal of KhaSr.No.526. Suit at the instant of respondent for possession of a portion of KhaSr.No.526 located in Mouja Khurai was decreed in Appeal vide Judgment and Decree dated 25-08-1970 by the FiRs.Additional District Judge, Sagar, in Civil Appeal No.78-A/1969 in favour of respondent. The judgment and decree was affirmed in Second Appeal No.550/1970 decreed on 25-02-1977. Civil Appeal No.2676/1977 preferred thereagainst was dismissed on 07-09-1994...
Pawan Chouhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.2334 of 2012 Smt. Nutan Fouzdar VERSUS State of M.P. Shri Manish Datt Senior Advocate with Shri Yogesh Soni, counsel for the applicant. Shri S. K. Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Criminal Revision No.2371/2012 Pawan Chouhan VERSUS State of M.P. Shri Prakash Upadhyay and Shri Prashant Dubey, counsel for the applicant. Shri S. K. Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. Criminal Revision No.152/2013 Ashok VERSUS State of M.P. Shri S. K. Gangrade, counsel for the applicant. Shri S. K. Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 18th day of March, 2013) These three revisions are connected with the common order...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »