Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Sulakshna Dubey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
WP No.4021.13 Writ Petition No.4021 of 2013 (Smt. Sulakshna Dubey versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and four otheRs.22-03-2013 Shri Arniruddh K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. Legality of order dated 05-01-2012 and 04-12-2012 is being questioned vide this petition. By order dated 05-01-2012 allotment of Government Quarter F-50/18, South T.T.Nagar, Bhopal, has been cancelled from 10-04-2007 being unauthorizedly occupied by the petitioner. Whereas, by order dated 04-12-2012 an Appeal preferred by the petitioner under section 9 of Lok Parisar Bedakhli Adhiniyam, 1974 has been rejected. Posted as Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Gandhi Nagar, Bhopal, petitioner was in occupation of Government Quarter not F-50/18, South T.T.Nagar, Bhopal allotted on 25-09-2003 when she was posted in Government Sultania Girls Higher Secondary School, Bhopal. On 10-04-2007 petitioner was transferred to Government High School, Khajuriya Kasam, Sehore. Thereafter the petitione...
Anand Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.1835/2009 Anand Dwivedi VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Raghvendra Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 22nd day of March, 2013) The applicant has preferred the present revision against the order dated 28.8.2009 passed by the learned Special Judge under Electricity Act, Katni in special case No.329/2007, whereby it was decided that the Special Court shall not try the offence punishable under section 429 of IPC and therefore, a separate trial be initiated against the applicant for offence punishable under section 429 of IPC.2. The prosecution's case, in short, is that, on 27.8.2006 at village Kuthla, Police Station Kuthla, District Katni, it...
Gabbu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL REVISION NO.139/2013 Gabbu and another Vs. State of M.P. .................................................................................................... Shri R. S. Patel, counsel for the applicants. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the State. .................................................................................................... ORDER (Delivered on the 22nd day of March, 2013) The applicants are convicted for offences punishable under Section 26(1)(b) of Indian Forest Act and Section 16(2) (b) read with Section 51 of the Wild Life Protection Act vide judgment dated 9.10.2012 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khandwa in Criminal Case No.1544/2008 and the applicants were sentenced for six months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/- and one years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/-. In Criminal Appeal No.209/2012 the learned IVth Additional...
Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (Mppkvv.Co.Ltd.) Vs. Prem
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.498/2009 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Bhagwandas Criminal Revision No.499/2009 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Prem Harijan Criminal Revision No.525/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Damodar Criminal Revision No.526/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Nanhe Bhai Criminal Revision No.527/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Uddyet Choudhary and another -:- 2 -:- Criminal Revisions No.498/09,499/09 525/08, 526/08, 527/08, 1142/2008 Criminal Revision No.1142/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Nijam --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Names of counsel for the parties in Criminal Revisions No.498/200...
Satish Kumar Verma Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Writ Petition No.2214/2005 22.3.2013 In compliance of our order dated 7.12.2012 a detailed compliance report has been filed by the State Government. A consolidated list of unauthorized religious structures, which are to be demolished, has also been filed and a copy of the same has been supplied to the petitioner. The report states that out of four religious structures, which were reconstructed after demolition, two have been removed and the remaining two will be demolished at the earliest. The report further states that the Durga Temple situated at Madan Mahal, has also been demolished. Similar compliance report has been filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation Jabalpur which states that, after demolition of four more unauthorized religious structures, total 561 such religious structures have been demolished till this date. Shri Sudhir Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the Railways, has filed a status report which states that notices for demolition of four unauthorized rel...
Manoj Singh Rajput Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
1 M.Cr. C No.9663/12 22.3.2013 Shri R.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Pramod Chourasia, learned P.L.for the State. In compliance of some earlier order, this case is listed today for final hearing. Since the certified copy of the charge-sheet is available on the record hence, with the consent of the parties the same is heard finally. The applicant/accused has filed this petition for quashment of the criminal case No.1157/10, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate FiRs.Class Patan Jabalpur, arising out of a crime No.180/10, registered against the applicant at Police Belkheda, for the offence punishable under Sections 279 and 304-A of I.P.C., in which, after holding the investigation the applicant has been charge-sheeted for his prosecution. Initially the case was argued at length by the applicants counsel saying that in view of some documents attached with the charge-sheet the impugned criminal case could not be proceeded further, but in view of the interrogatory s...
K.C. JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
M.Cr.C.No.1241/2012 22.3.2013 Shri Brijesh Dubey, Counsel for the petitioner. Smt.Pratibha Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. Learned counsel for the respondent again prays for some time to call for the case diary. Though objected by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that much time have already been granted for calling the diary, by way of last opportunity time is granted. Order passed on 15.3.2013, directing the police to not to take coercive steps against the petitioner shall continue till the next date of hearing. List the case on 5th April, 2013. Certified copy as per rules. (M.A.Siddiqui) Judge sb...
Anand Kumar Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
CRR No.2287/2012 Criminal Revision No.2287/2012 22.3.2013 Smt. Jyoti Rai, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. Heard on admission. The applicant has challenged the order dated 23.8.2012 passed by the learned FiRs.Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in criminal MJ.No.31/2012. The facts of the case, relating to the present revision, in short, are that, a prosecution was initiated against the applicant under the NDPS Act and his vehicle bearing number MP19-H-1975 was seized. Thereafter, the applicant applied for Supurdgi of the vehicle but, his application was not accepted. Vide judgment dated 19.7.2012, the applicant was acquitted and it was directed that he was entitled to get the amount of fine back and also the vehicle seized from him. Thereafter, the applicant applied before the concerned trial Court that the entire parts of the vehicle were stolen and therefore, a commission may be appointed for mechanical examination of the vehicle and ...
Tejbhan Vs. Janki Prasad Patel
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
W.P. No. 2869 Of 2013 22.3.2013 Shri R.P. Kanojiya, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Heard. Order dated 30.1.2013 passed by Civil Judge Class I, Mauganj, Rewa in Civil Suit No. 389A/2009 is being assailed vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India; whereby, the application under Order 6 Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed by the petitioners who are respondents was partly allowed. Grievance is in respect of the amendment disallowed. Suit by respondent/plaintiff is for declaration of title in respect of plot bearing Survey No. 467/1840 area 0.08 hectare Mauganj, Rewa. After commencement of trial petitioners sought leave to amend the pleadings by incorporating family tree vide Schedule 'A' to written statement and for amendment in paragraph 5 of written statement in place of 15 as 35 and by incorporating new paragraph 5 A impleading therein that the suit land was in occupation of Molai Kol...
Manju @ Devendra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Cr.R.No.2045/2012 22.3.2013 Shri B.J.Chourasiya, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. As prayed by learned counsel for the parties, heard them finally. The applicant has preferred the present revision against the order dated 17.8.2012 passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh in ST. No.264/2011 whereby the charge of offence punishable under Section 306 of I.P.C is framed against the applicant. The prosecution's case in short is that, the deceased was in habit to place his money in gambling and other evils. He took much amount of loan from various villagers including the applicant. The applicant asked for return of the loan but, the deceased could not return the money and he committed suicide by leaving a suicidal note that the applicant gave a threat to the deceased that within one day his money should be returned. Charge sheet was filed and ultimately the matter was placed before the Sessions Court. After considering...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »