Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 22 2013

Smt. Ashabai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

M.Cr.C.No.3398/2013 22.3.2013 Shri Amit Jain, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. Admit. Call for the case diary. Heard on I.A.No.6212/2013, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant. The applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Crime No.57/2013 registered at P.S.Khurai, District Sagar for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B, 498-A of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is a lady, she has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant is sister-in-law (Nand) of deceased. Marriage of applicant was solemnized before 8 years of the incident and she is living with her husband in Village Sewan. Annexure A-2 has been filed in this regard. The applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest her reputation will be tarnished, therefore, she be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. On due consideration of ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

M.P.Rajya Vidyut Mandal Vs. Uddyet Choudhary

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.498/2009 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Bhagwandas Criminal Revision No.499/2009 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Prem Harijan Criminal Revision No.525/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Damodar Criminal Revision No.526/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Nanhe Bhai Criminal Revision No.527/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Uddyet Choudhary and another -:- 2 -:- Criminal Revisions No.498/09,499/09 525/08, 526/08, 527/08, 1142/2008 Criminal Revision No.1142/2008 Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal (M.P.P.K.V.V.Co.Ltd.) VERSUS Nijam --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Names of counsel for the parties in Criminal Revisions No.498/200...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

M.P.Rajya Vidyut Mandal Vs. Nanhe Bhai

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

M/S Raj Kumar Rajendra Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

1 W.P.No.20806of 2012(O) 22.3.2013 Shri S. Gulatee, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, Government Advocate, for the respondent No.1. Shri Sanjay Sarvate, Advocate for respondent No.2 and 3. Learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that he has been recently being engaged by respondent no.3 and he has to file Vakalatnama . He wants two weeks' time to file reply. Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the petitioner hence time is granted. I.R.granted earlier to continue till next date of hearing. List this petition alongwith WP No.20959/12 (O).WP No.2095/12 (O),WP No.20960/12 (O).WP No.20962/12 (O).WP No.20967/12 (O).WP No.20973/12 (O).WP No.20979/12 (O),WP No.20980/12 (O),WP No.20984/12 (O).WP No.21009/12 (O).WP No.21105/12 (O).WP No.21114/12 (O).WP No.21119/12 (O).WP No.21127/12 (O).WP No.21129/12 (O).WP No.21130/12 (O).WP No.21141/12 (O).WP No.21144/12 (O).WP No.21147/12 (O).and WP No.21149/12 (O).for analogous hearing after two weeks. Certified copy as per rules. (...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

Dharmendra Sodhiya @ Bhinda Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

M.Cr.C.No.3206/2013 22.3.2013 Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 25.2.2013 in connection with Crime No.109/2013 registered at P.S.Civil Lines, District Rewa for the offence punishable under section 34(2) of the M.P.Excise Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. As per prosecution, 63 bulk liters of illicit liquor alleged to have been seized from the possession of the applicant. The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

Govind @ Bablu Vishwakarma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON. SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J.CRIMINAL REVISION NO.164/2013 Govind @ Bablu Vishwakarma. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Pradeep Naveriya, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 22nd day of March, 2013) The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304-A of IPC vide judgment dated 23.3.2011 passed by the JMFC Tikarmgarh (Ku. Sonal Chourasiya) in Criminal Case No.547/2006 and sentenced for six months' RI with fine of Rs.100/-. In Criminal Appeal No.191/2011 the learned Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh vide judgment dated 24.1.2013 dismissed the appeal in toto. Being aggrieved with both the judgments, the applicant has filed the present revision.2. The prosecution case, in shor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

Awadh Kishor Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

M.Cr.C.No.3376/2013 22.3.2013 Shri Deependra Mishra, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Akhilendra Singh, GA for the State. Shri Mukesh Pandey, Advocate for the objector. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicants under section 438 of Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.40/2013 registered at P.S.Ajaygarh, District Panna for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 323, 294 & 506-B of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. The incident took place on the spur of the moment. Though, the firearm is alleged to have been used at the time of incident, but fire was not made. A counter case has also been registered against the complainant party vide Crime No.41/2013 for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 323, 294 and 506 of the IPC. The applicants are ready to co-operate in the investigation and trial. They are reputed cit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

Smt. Savitri Korisw Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

Criminal Revision No.175/2013 22.03.2013 Shri G.P.Tripathi, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Heard on the question of admission. By this Criminal Revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C.the applicants have challenged the order dated 19.11.2012 passed by the learned Third Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in ST No.608/2012 whereby the charges of offence punishable under Section 302 or 304-B or 306 or 498-A of IPC are framed against the applicants. The prosecution case, in short, is that the deceased Arti Kori was married with the applicant Pramod Kumar. Smt. Savitri Kori is mother of the applicant Pramod Kumar whereas Arjun Singh is uncle of the applicant Pramod Kumar. It is alleged against the applicants that they harassed the deceased for demand of dowry, and therefore on 20.5.2012 either the deceased committed suicide or she was killed. After due investigation, a charge sheet was filed before the concerned Court. After conside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

Sunil Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

Criminal Revision No.341/2013 22.03.2013 Shri A.K.Jain, Advocate for the applicants. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Heard on the question of admission. By this Criminal Revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C.the applicants have challenged the order dated 9.1.2013 passed by the learned FiRs.Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara District Narsinghpur in ST No.224/2011 whereby the charges of offence punishable under Section 307/34 of IPC were framed against the applicants for the victims Bade Gujar, Nanhe Bhiya and Netram along with other charges.(Learned counsel for the State informs that the victim is not Netram. His name is Tejram, but in the memo of charge, name of the victim is shown to be Netram).The prosecution case, in short, is that on 18.5.2011 at about 11:00 AM the victims were going on a motorcycle. They were dashed by a car driven by the applicant No.2 Rajesh Patel. Thereafter all the applicants abused the victims and chased them. It is alleged that t...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

M.P.Rajya Vidyut Mandal M.P. Vs. Nijam

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Next ›
Last »

Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.