Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The St. Josephs Convent School Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
Writ Petition No. 5452 Of 2013 26.3.2013 Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S. Beg, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. Shri Kumaresh Pathak, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, on advance notice. Petitioner, a minority educational institution vide this petition calls in question the applicability and constitutional validity of Sections, 3, 4, 5, 12 (1) (c), 12 (2), 13 (1), 13 (2) (b), 14, 15, 16 and 18 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and seeks declaration that the provisions of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 are not applicable to the Institution. At the outset it is being stated at Bar that the controversy as is raised in this case has been answered and settled at rest by decision rendered by Supreme Court in Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India and another [(2012) ...
Dr. Satish Chandra JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
W.P.No.5007/2013 26.03.2013 Shri Pratyush Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. I.A.No.4059/2013, an application for replacement of documents filed as Annexure P-2 is considered and allowed. The documents be replaced as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. Issue notice of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of P.F.within 7 days by registered A.D.Notices be made returnable in six weeks. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was granted the benefit of higher pay fixation pursuant to the order of the competent authority, which order has been recalled by impugned order dated 01.03.2013, as a consequence whereof, the amount said to be paid in excess to the petitioner would be recovered from him. According to him, such an action is bad in law. Considering the fact that similar issues have been raised in other writ petitions and interim protection has been granted against recovery, it is dire...
M.P.State Electricity Board Vs. Smt.Vimla Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
F.A. No.114/2006 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava F.A. No.114/2006 APPELLANTS 1 M.P. Electricity Board through Secretary, M.P. State Electricity Board.2. Electrical Engineer, Ministry of Electricity, Government of M.P. Bhopal 3. Chief Executive Engineer, M.P. State Electricity Board, Bareli, Division Bareli, District Raisen.4. Assistant Engineer, M.P. State Electricity Board, Udaypura, Tehsil Udaypura, District Raisen. -Versus- RESPONDENTS:1. Smt. Vimla Bai wd/o Late Ajab Singh Lodhi, 2. Smt. Nanhibai wd/o Shobharamlodhi 3. Hiralal @ Bhaiyaji, s/o Ajabsingh Lodhi 4. Rajendrasingh s/o Ajabsingh 5. Ku. Deepa d/o Ajab Singh Sl. No.4 to 5 Minot through guardian Smt. Vimlabai Mother, R/o Gram Thala, Tehsil Udaipura, Dist. Raisen (M.P.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Anoop Nair and Shoibh Khan, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Manikant Sharma, Advocate for the respondents....
Naveen Kumar Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
Cr.R.No.521/2010 26.3.2013 None for the applicants even in the second round. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Vide order dated 21.4.2010 it was directed that necessary steps be taken for the service of notice to the respondent no.2 and if steps are not taken within seven days then the revision shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. It is highly objectionable that the concerned D.A did not comply the order dated 21.4.2010. Learned counsel for the applicants is not appearing since April 2010 and therefore, it appears that he does not want to prosecute the present revision. Consequently, the present revision filed by the applicants Naresh Gupta and Raj Kumar Pandey against the order dated 28.1.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shahdol in ST. No.44/2009 is hereby dismissed in want of prosecution. Copy of the order be sent to the trial Court with the information that the stay order granted in the case is hereby vaca...
Prabhudayal More Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
Cr.R.No.1773/1999 26.3.2013 None for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the State. It appears that no Advocate is appearing for the applicant since last 8 yeaRs.It appears that the learned counsel for the applicant does not want to prosecute the present revision. Consequently the present revision application filed by the applicant Prabhu Dayal More against the impugned order dated 7.10.1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Narsinghpur in Criminal Appeal No.99/1998 is hereby dismissed in want of prosecution. Copy of the order be sent to the trial Court as well as the appellate Court along with their records for information. (N.K.Gupta) Judge bina...
Amit Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3475/2013 26.3.2013 Shri Mohan Sausarkar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Puneet Shroti, PL , for the respondent-State. Heard. Admit. Call for the case diary. Also heard the learned counsel for the parties on IANo.6413/2013 for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail. Applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.510/2012 registered at Police Station Shahdol for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, who has no criminal past alleged against him. He is ready to Co.operate in the investigation. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant and prosecutrix were never lived at Shahdol. It is a matrimonial case wherein in the event of arrest of the applicant, the possibility of compromise between them will be diminished therefore, he prays from grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the ...
Chairman, M.P.S.E.B. Vs. Smt. Vimla Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
F.A. No.140/2006 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava F.A. No.140/2006 1. CHAIRMAN, M.P.S.E.B. JABALPUR 2 PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY M.P.S.E.B. JABALPUR 3 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O&M, NORTH DIVISION, M.P.S.E.B., NEHRU NAGAR, REWA (Officer Incharge for appellants Leela Charan Garg s/o Kalluram Garg, Executive Engineer, O&M, North Division, MPPKVVCL, Rewa ...Appellants -Versus- 1. SMT. VIMLA SINGH w/o LATE RAMSUMIRAN SINGH 2 ANAND SINGH s/o LATE RAM SUMIRAN SINGH THROUGH HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. VIMLA SINGH, BOTH ARE R/O VILLAGE GOUHANA P.S. JAWA TEH. TYONTHAR DISTT. REWA ... Respondents/Plaintiffs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Mukesh Agarwal, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Akhilesh Singh, Advocate for the respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT {26032013} Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27.9.200...
Kamlesh Kumar Patel Vs. Smt. Madhulata
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
M.Cr.C.No.2439 of 2011 M.Cr.C.No.2439 o26. 03.2013 Shri Sharad Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri S.P.Singh, learned counsel for the respondent. At the request of the applicant's counsel his IA No.4940/12 is taken up for consideration. The same is filed for taking the annexed documents on record. Other side did not have any objection in allowing such application and taking such documents on record. On consideration by allowing the IA, the annexed documents are taken on record. In compliance of the earlier direction, this case is listed today for final hearing at motion stage. Heard. ORDER (Oral) (1) The applicant-husband has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.for quashment of the proceeding initiated by the respondent under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Katni as MJ.No.44/09 against him for appropriate direction to pay her the sum of maintenance as prayed in the application. (2) The applicant's counsel after taking me ...
Jawaharlal Nehru Samriti Mahavidyalaya Swaroop Nagar Opp.Forest Depot, ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
WP 15132.12 Writ Petition N o. 15132 o26. 03/2013 Shri Praveen Chourasiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kumaresh Pathak, learned Dy. Advocate General for the respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Mahendra Pateriya, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. Shri K.K.Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. Petitioner vide this petition seeks direction to respondent/University for conducting Special Examination of fiRs.year students of B.Ed. CouRs.of the students admitted in the petitioner/ Institution in the year 2008- 09. At the outset it is stated on behalf of the parties that the issue which has been raised in this petition as to whether students admitted in petitioner/College in the academic year 2008- 09 for B.Ed. would be entitled to take up the examination as the same has been declined for the reason that the students have directly admitted to that colleges without taking recouRs.to selection through counseling as is the mode prescribed under 3.3 of Appendix 7 of N.C.T.E...
Smt. Mithla Rai Vs. Municipal Corporation
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
W.P.NO.4570/2013 26-03-2013 Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents. At this Stage Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel appears and takes notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2, 3 and 4. Taking note of the short controveRs.involved in the matter with the consent of the parties, petition is disposed of at this stage only. Challenging the impugned demand notice issued by Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur, proposing to recovery from the petitioner a sum of Rs.2,48,071/- towards property tax for the financial year 2011-12 and 2012-13, petitioner has filed this writ petition. It is stated by the petitioner that petitioner has submitted a detailed objection and has brought to the notice of authorities various deposits made by him. The only relief claimed by the petitioner is that respondents be directed to consider the objection of the petitioner, decide it and thereafter proceed with the recovery. Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel appearing for...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »