Madhya Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of M.P. Vs. Virbhan Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.623/1999 State of Madhya Pradesh VERSUS Virbhan Singh and others --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the State/applicant. Shri Manish Datt, Senior Advocate alongwith Shri Ajay Mishra, Advocate for the respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 21st day of February, 2013) The State has preferred the present revision against the order dated 22.1.1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Panna in S.T.No.79/1998, whereby the respondents were discharged from the charge of offence punishable under section 306 of IPC.2. The prosecution's case, in short, is that, the deceased Sheela Bai, wife of Shankar Patel, was found dead in her house on 18.3.1998. It was found that she committed suicide. During the investigation, it was found that on 16...
M.P.GramIn Krishi Vistar Adhikari Sangh Distt.Branch Satna Vs. Shri R. ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
Conc No :1521. / 2012 MP Gramin Krishi Vikas Adhikari versus Shri R.K.Swai and others 21.02.2013. Shri Ajeet Singh for the applicant. Shri Munish Saini for non-applicants 1 and 2. Interalia contending that certain directions issued by this court in W.P(S) No.6643/2004, on 13.12.2005, has not been complied with, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents/non-applicants not to compel the members of the applicants association to distribute agriculture inputs to the farmeRs.Even though records indicate that initially an order was passed contrary to this direction on 12.10.2010, but the same was withdrawn vide order issued on 25.11.2010. These facts are evident from the proceedings dated 29.11.2010, available in the record of Contempt Case No.1377/2010. Now, from the return filed by the non-applicants it is seen that they are not insisting upon not compelling the members of the applicants associat...
Ummed Singh Vs. Sanjaya Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
Ummed Singh & Others versus Shri Sanjay Singh & OtheRs.Conc. No.1416 21. 2.2013: Shri A.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for respondents. Keeping in view the order passed by respondents as contained in Annexure R-1 rejecting claim of petitioner, not no further action is required to be taken. In case petitioner has any grievance still subsisting, he may challenge the order Annexure R-1 dated 16.10.2012 afresh in accordance to law. Accordingly, no case is made out for initiating action for contempt, respondents are discharged from the proceedings and the contempt application is disposed of. With the aforesaid the application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-...
Kedar Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.1404/2012 KEDAR SINGH VS. STATE OF M.P. & OTHERS Present: Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. Shri A. P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents No.1 to 7. Shri Rohit Sohgaura, learned counsel for respondent No.8. _________________________________________________ Whether approved for reporting: Yes/ No ORDER (21.2.2013) Seeking a direction to the police authorities to register a criminal case against officers of Indus Ind Bank Ltd. particularly respondent No.8 Shri Mahesh Singh in pursuance to a report Annexure P/8 submitted by the police authorities on 31.12.2011 and further seeking for quashing a show cause notice issued by the Regional Trasport Authority, Rewa on 29.12.2011 as contained in Annexures P/10(A) and P/10(B), this writ petition has been filed2. Petitioner claims to be owner of two trucks bearing not MP17HH/0460 and MP17HH/0251. The aforesaid ...
R.P. Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
WA 108.13 Writ Appeal No.108 of 2013 (R.P.Singh versus State of Madhya Pradesh and two otheRs.21/02/2013 Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Prashant Singh, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Anil Khare, learned senior counsel with Shri P.C.Chandak, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. Admit. Taken for final hearing. Appellant has challenged the judgment in appeal dated 16-01-2013 passed in writ petition No.20363/2012 by which learned Single Judge has declined to interfere with the order of transfer. In writ petition the petitioner contended that the impugned order dated 01-12-2012 is illegal, arbitrary and suffers from malice in fact and malice in law since it has been passed inter-alia without any reason and that too within the period of five months from his earlier transfer dated 15-07-2012. The petitioner was transferred to Sagar on 15-07-2012 and the respondent No.3 was transferred from Sagar to Ujjain. Within a per...
Ramkishan Agarwal Vs. State Bank of India Th.B.M.and ors
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
C.R.639/2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR CIVIL REVISION No.639 of 2004 SINGLE BENCH: JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Applicant : Ramkishan Agarwal, S/o Late Bhagwan Das Agarwal, resident of Main Road, Gotegaon, District Narsinghpur (M.P.) Versus Respondents :1. State Bank of India through the Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Gotegaon, Tahsil, Gotegaon, District Narsinghpur (M.P.) 2. Smt. Chandabai,W/o Shri Gulab Gir (Telegraphwale).presently residing in front of Hitkarni Garha School, Deotal, Garha, Jabalpur (M.P.) 3. Shri Preetam Puri, S/o Shri Gulab Puri Goswami, resident of Mahant Bhawan, Shivaji Ward, Kandeli Narsinghpur, District Narsinghpur (M.P.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant by - Shri K.N.Agrawal, Advocate Respondents by - None --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (21/02/2013) Indeed a joint decree has been passed against...
Smt. Sangeeta Verma Vs. Shri Rameshwar Dayal Srivastav
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
(1) M.A. No.244/2012 HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava Misc. Appeal No.244 / 2012 Appellant Smt. Sangeeta Verma, D/o. Late Shri Prem Narayan Rabuda, W/o. Shri Arjun Singh, R/o. 22, Bheru Gargh Nagar, Tehsil and District Dewas (M.P.) Vs. Respondents:1. Shri Rameshwar Dayal Srivastav S/o. Shri Shambhu Dayal Srivastav, R/o. Near Main Post Office, Kothi Bazar Nagar, Tehsil and District Hoshangabad (M.P.) 2. Shri Dulari Rabuda (deleted) 3. Shri Rajesh Rabuda S/o. Shri Prem Narayan Rabuda, 4. Shri Sunil Rabuda, S/o. Prem Narayan Rabuda 5. Shri Sanjay Rabuda, S/o. Shri Prem Narayan Rabuda No.3 to 5 R/o. Near Main Post Office, Kothi Bazar, Nagar, Tehsil and District Hoshangabad (M.P.) _______________________________________________________ Shri Pranay Verma, Advocate for appellant. Shri Manikant Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1. (2) M.A. No.244/2012 Shri Mrigendra Singh and Shri Amit Khatri, Advocates for respondents no.3 to 5. ...
Anil Kumar Tiwari Vs. Shri Rajiv Ranjan
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
Conc No :1412. / 2012 Anil Kumar Tiwari versus Shri Rajiv Ranjan and another 21.02.2013. Shri D.K.Dixit for the applicant. Shri Prashant Singh alongwith Shri Manas Verma for the non-applicants. Interalia contending that certain directions issued by this Court on 2.3.2012, in Writ Petition No.3390/2012(S).has not been complied with, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt. The writ petition was disposed of without notice to the respondents/non-applicants and it was directed that claim of the applicant/petitioner that in the light of the law laid down in the case of Smt. Prerna versus State of MP and otheRs.W.P.No.6773/2006, decided on 26.4.2007, his claim be considered and a decision taken. Non-applicants have filed return and contend that vide order-dated 16.4.2012 Annexure R/1, pay scale has been granted to the applicant, but as far as grant of Kramonnati is concerned, they have filed document Annexure R/2 and proceedings of the DPC is enclosed therewith, ...
V.S. Trivedi Vs. M.P. Road Transport Corporation
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
W.A.No.931/2010 21.2.2013 Parties present. Be listed for hearing on 19th March 2013 . (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) JUDGE JUDGE Ag Cont.Petition No.1462/2011 11.2.2013 Shri Naman Nagrath, learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, prays two weeks' time to file reply. Prayer is allowed. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) JUDGE JUDGE Ag Conc. No.1903/2012 11.2.2013 Parties present. Shri Rahul Jain, learned Dy. Advocate General submits that he has received instructions on 18.1.2013 that the consequential action in compliance of the order dated 2.7.2012 has been initiated. However, it will take further two weeks' time to comply the same. In view of the aforesaid prayer, hearing of this petition is adjourned to 11th March 2013. On the next date of hearing, the respondent shall file compliance report. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) JUDGE JUDGE Ag Cont.Cr. No.8/2012 11.2.2013 Petitioner present in person. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents No.1 and 3...
Afsar Khan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL REVISION NO.598 of 1999 Afsar Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh .................................................................................................... Shri Manish Datt, Senior Advocate with Shri Ajay Mishra counsel for the applicant. Shri Vinot Fouzdar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/ State. .................................................................................................... ORDER (Delivered on the 21st day of February, 2013) The applicant was convicted vide judgment dated 5.10.1998 by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Silwani, District Raisen in Criminal Case No.249/1993 for offences punishable under Section 25 and Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced for one years rigorous imprisonment for each count with fine of Rs.200/-. It was also directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently. In Criminal Appeal No.107/1998 the learned Additional Ses...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »