Madhya Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt.Parvati Bai Vs. M.P.State Agro Industries Development Corporation ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
W.P.No.4390/2009 27.2.2013 Shri Arvind Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondent though served and represented. This Court has granted ample opportunity to the respondent to file the return as the petition was admitted on 1.3.2011 and time to file the return was granted on 13.9.2012. Lastly, when the matter was listed on 11.2.2013, again the time was extended for filing of the return. Till now, no return has been filed by the respondents. In view of the aforesaid, the interim prayer made by the petitioner is considered. It is contended that the petitioner has claimed classification by filing the dispute before the labour court. The said claim was granted against which an appeal was preferred by the respondents but the same was dismissed. Since the petitioner is classified, she is entitled to the pay of the post on which she has been classified. Looking to the aforesaid, the petitioner be paid the minimum of the pay scale as wages on the post held by her f...
Asha Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
W.P.No.2940/2013 27.2.2013 Shri Gopal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents, on advance notice. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that the controveRs.involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by an order dated 9.5.2008 passed by the Gwalior Bench of this Court in W.P.(s) No.5066/2007 (Brajesh Kumar Tiwari versus C.E.O.Zila Panchayat Shivpuri and others).In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 9.5.2008 passed by this Court in W.P.(s) No.5066/2007. Certified copy as per rules. (K.K.Trivedi) Judge A.Praj....
Hob Lal Gval Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
W.P.No.2766/2013 27.2.2013 Mr.Santosh Meshram, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Mr.R.Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally. In this writ petition, the petitioner, inter alia , seeks a direction to the respondents to absorb the services of the petitioners in Adhyapak Samvarg from Shiksha Karmi- III. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the controveRs.involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by order dated 30.7.2012 passed by Indore Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7387/2012(S).In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and as agreed to by them, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of order passed by Division Bench in W.A.No.596/2010 (Gopal Chawla and others versus State of M.P.and otheRs.and pass appropriate ordeRs.Needless to state, the competent authority shall pass a spea...
Prabhat Kumar Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
Criminal Revision Nos.1162/2012 & 1163/2012 27.02.2013 Shri Manish Datt, senior counsel with Shri Yogesh Soni counsel for the applicants. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. As prayed by the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Since both the revisions are connected with the same case therefore, decided by a common order. The applicants have challenged the order dated 17.4.2012 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge Maihar, District Satna in S.T.No.76/12, whereby the charges of the offences punishable under Sections 341/34, 386/34, 325/34 & 294 of IPC were framed against the applicants. They have also challenged the order dated 16.5.2012 of the same case, by which the charge of the offence punishable under Section 325 of IPC was modified into the charges of the offences punishable under Sections 329/34 of IPC. The prosecution's case, in short is that, on 11.12.2011 at about 9:15 p.m.the applicants assaulted the victim Suraj P...
Pappu Singh @ Dipraj Singh and ors. Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
CRR No.1049/1999 Criminal Revision No.1049/1999 27.2.2013 Shri L.S.Singh, Senior Advocate along with Shri Luvkush Mishra, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Vinot Fauzdar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the parties finally. The applicant has preferred the present revision against the order dated 29.6.1999 passed by the learned Special Judge, under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Rewa, whereby the charges of offence punishable under section 506 (II) of IPC and section 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act were framed against the applicants. The prosecution's case, in short, is that, the complainant Bhagwan Das and other 4-5 persons had given a complaint to the Collector, Rewa that the applicants were harassing them on the basis of the caste. They had given threatening to them. They have directed that being Basores, they should touch the feet of the applicants otherwise, they would chop off their hands and legs. The collector, Rewa s...
Kamal Bhan Marskole Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
Writ Petition No ::3023. / 2013 Kamal Bhan Marskole versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others 27.02.2013. Shri Sachindra Raghuwanshi for the petitioner. Considering the fact that representation of the petitioner is pending before respondent No.2, learned Accountant General, Madhya Pradesh, for the present without entering into the controveRs.on merits, respondent No.2 is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders with regard to his grievance within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules today. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
Sukhvanti Swa Sahayta Samooh Koni Kala Janpad Panchayat Jawa Rewa Vs. ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
1 W.P.No.3194/2013 27.2.2013 Shri Ajeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Dy. Govt. Adv.for the respondents. Challenging orders dated 15.2.2013 and 22.2.2013 passed by the competent authority as contained in Annexure P/1 and P/2 instructing lodging of FIR against the petitioner, this writ petition has been filed. It is a case of the petitioner that FIR has been directed to be lodged against establishment of the petitioner without notice, without hearing them and without conducting proper enquiry. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Dy. Govt. Adv.invites my attention to the facts available on record and submits that petitioner's establishment was granted working of distributing mid day meals and when the competent authority of the Head Quarter from Delhi conducted inspection of the establishment on 29th and 30th of January 2013 it was found that in the Aganwadi Centre in question for the last one year proper mid day meal are not being distributed and f...
Shri Iqbal Khan Vs. Wakf Khankah Nijamiyan Aagha Chowk, Ranital Jabalp ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
C.R.No.97/2013 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K.Shrivastava C.R.No.97/2013 APPLICANT SHRI IQBAL KHAN s/O LATE WARIS KHAN, R/o KASTURBA WARD (PURANA GARHAPHATAK WARD H.No.90) AAGHA CHOWK KARBALA ROAD RANITAL JABALPUR DISTT. JABALPUR M.P.Versus RESPONDENTS 1 WAKF KHANKAH NIJAMIA AGA CHOWK, RANITAL, JABALPUR THROUGH ITS MUTAWALLI SAYYED LIYAKAT ALI, S/o SAYYAD KHURSHEED ALI, R/O 263/01, NAYA MOHALLA, JAIPRAKASH NARAYAN WARD, JABALPUR (M.P.) 2. M.P.WAKF BOARD, BHOPAL THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NEAR TAJUL MASJID, BHOPAL, DISTRICT M.P.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant by - Shri Saurabh Tiwari, Advocate Respondent No.1 by Shri A.M.Trivedi, Senior Advocate with Shri Ritesh Sharma, Advocate Respondent No.2 by- Shri Saleem Rahman, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER {2702-2013} For the reasons stated in the order dat...
Parvati Khare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
Writ Petition No.2892/2013 27/02/2013 Shri Amit Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents-State on advance copy. With the consent of learned counsel for parties heard finally. Stating that the petitioners are also similarly placed persons that of Dharam Pal Chaurasiya and otheRs.who have approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.2858/2005 (S).which was disposed of finally vide order dated 23.11.2007 the petitioners are also entitled to be given the benefit of order passed by coordinate bench of this Court at Indore in W.P.No.6773/2006 (S) (Smt. Prerna W/o Shri Promod Koranne versus State of M.P.& otheRs.decided on 26.1.2007, the petitioners have prayed for similar directions. It is seen that the aforesaid writ petition was decided in the following manner: 17. Consequently these petitions are allowed. The petitioners are entitled to derive the benefit of second Kramonnati according to the terms and conditions mentio...
Smt. Usha JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
W.P.No.2871/2013 27.02.2013 Smt. Sudha Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents. Heard on the question of admission. It is contended in the writ petition that the dispute is squarely covered by a decision rendered by this Court in the case of Dwarkesh versus State of M.P and another, [2004 (1) MPLJ 261 .and other analogous matters in W.P.No.2354/2003, W.P.No.2880/2003 (O.A.No.1309 and 2022 of 2002 decided on 30.8.2003) by Indore Bench of this Court and in the case of Ku.Neena Dwivedi and another versus State of M.P.and otheRs.2004(2) MPHT 221 Also reliance is placed on the order passed in the case of Shashi Bhusan Dwivedi versus State of M.P and others (W.P.No.6932/2006(s) decided by this Court on 15/05/2006. It is further contended that after the decision rendered in the aforesaid cases certain instructions were issued by the State Government. Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court has further disposed of certain writ petit...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »