Madhya Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shivendra Singh Baghel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
Shivendra Singh & Others versus State of M.P.M.Cr.C.No.14792 05. 02.2013 : Shri Brijendra Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Government Advocate for the State. This application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.and applicant apprehends his arrest in Crime No.286/2012, registered by Police Station Hanumanna District Rewa, for having committed offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 341, 506-B, 327 of I.P.C.While considering I.A.No.25668/2012 on 17.12.2012 ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant and, there is no circumstances available to show that the applicant has mis-used the bail granted. Keeping in view the aforesaid, there is no change in the circumstances and, therefore, the order passed on 17.12.2012 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant is affirmed. Considering the same, this application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest applicant Shivendra Singh Baghel shall be released on bail on...
Birendra Singh Parihar Vs. Indian Oil Corporation and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.3549/2004 BIRENDRA SINGH PARIHAR VS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION. & 4 OTHERS Present: Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. Shri Mrigendra Singh, learned counsel with Shri Hitendra Singh, for the petitioner. Shri Virendra Verma, learned counsel for the respondents No.1, 2 and 3. Shri M. L. Jaiswal, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Manot Kushwaha, for respondent No.4. Whether approved for reporting: Yes/ No ORDER ( -2-2013 ) Challenging cancellation of a letter of allotment made in favour of the petitioner in the matter of granting dealership for distribution of liquid petroleum gas by the Indian Oil Corporation, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner.2. The case in hand has a chequered history as the dispute arises out of an advertisement which was issued way 2 back on 14.1.94 by the Indian Oil Corporation and this is third round of litigation between the parties with regard to the allocation in question.3. Facts ...
Raj Shankar Pal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
1 Cr.R. No.1824 of 2012 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON. SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1824/2012 Raj Shankar Pal & another. -Vs- State of Madhya Pradesh. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Nitin Karan, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Punit Shroti, Panel Lawyer for the respondent- State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 5th day of February, 2013) By this criminal revision the applicants have challenged the order dated 25.6.2012 passed by the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in ST No.207/2012 whereby the charges of offence punishable under Section 304-B in alternative Section 306 of IPC were framed against the applicants.2. The prosecution case, in short, is that Smt. Leelapal, wife of the applicant No.1 has committed suicide on 21.6.2010 at the residential quarter of the applicant No.1 situated at Khamariya. The post- mo...
Manoj @ Gudda Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
Cr.R.No.1061/2010 05.2.2013 Shri Hemant Namdeo, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Punit Shroti, learned PL for respondent-State. In compliance of order dated 29.11.2012 under execution of the show cause notice Surety Hanif, S/o Ramjan, R/o Jhiriakheda, district Sagar Surety of the applicant is present in person. Identified by his counsel Shri Hakeem Khan, present in the court. Surety seeks for and is granted the period of fifteen days to keep present the applicant before this court or to file reply of the show cause notice explaining the circumstances in which he could not keep present the applicant before the court on earlier date which was so fixed in this regard. Considering the aforesaid prayer the case is adjourned with a direction to place the same on 5.3.2013. Surety present in person is also directed to remain present on the aforesaid date, meanwhile he may file the reply of aforesaid show cause notice. Let the presence of the applicant before this court on the aforesaid ...
Rambharos Vs. Smt. Narmadi Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
R.P.21 o05. 02.13 Shri Priyank Khandelwal, counsel for the applicant. Shri Umesh Trivedi, counsel for the respondent. Heard. The applicant has filed this petition for review of the order dated 13.9.12 passed by this Court in W.P.No.13907/12 whereby in the absence of the present applicant such writ petition was disposed of by extending the liberty to the respondent to file the application under Order 39 rule 4 of the C.P.C before the trial court along with those papers which were not submitted earlier before the trial court with a further direction to the trial court that on filing such application, the same be considered on its own merits without influencing from any finding or observation made by this court in earlier order granting interlocutory injunction in favor of the respondent or by the appellate court in the order impugned. Having heard the parties in the available circumstances, by allowing this petition in part the aforesaid earlier order is modified and the trial court is d...
Manish Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
M.Cr.C.No.1193/2013 05/02/2013 Shri Madan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Santosh Yadav, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicant is in custody since 10.11.2012 in connection with Crime No.494/2012 registered at Police Station Kareli,, District, Narsinghpur, for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S.Act. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime. It is contended that after arrest of the applicant in the earlier crime in 2007, no further case was registered against him. The said trial is pending consideration. It is pointed out by learned counsel appearing for the State that the applicant was earlier also arrested for the same offence in the year 2007 and the case registered against him is pending consideration. Looking to the facts as have come on record and after perusal of the challan papers filed by the applicant, the application...
Munna @ Munnalal Mallah Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
M.Cr.C.No.606/2013 (Munna alias Munnalal Mallah & another v. State of M.P.) 05-02-2013 Shri Ajay Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Sudesh Verma, learned G.A.for the State/non- applicant. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The applicants have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail on account of the fact that they have been arrested on 26-10-2012 pursuant to the Crime No.374/2011 registered against them at P.S.Gotegaon, District Narsinghpur, for offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(g) and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants that they have been falsely implicated on account of certain altercation and dispute between the complainant Prabhabai and the applicants, all of whom are working in the local Aanganwadi Centre. It is submitted that the complainant and her husband had both filed an affidavit before the Court wherein the complainant and her ...
Ram Sewak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
M.Cr.C.No :15220. / 2012 Ram Sewak and another versus State of Madhya Pradesh 05.02.2013. Smt. Shimla Jain for the applicants. Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the State. Heard. Case diary perused. Apprehending their arrest in Crime No.210/2011 registered at Police Station Tejgarh, District Damoh for offence under section 409 of the IPC, this application has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail. Applicant No.1 is the Secretary of the Gram Panchayat and applicant No.2 is the Ex-Sarpanch. Records indicate that they are being proceeded against due to embezzlement of an amount of more than 13 Lacs. Taking note of the nature of material available in the case diary and the totality of the circumstances, it is not proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants. The application is accordingly dismissed. (RAJENDRA MENON) Aks/- JUDGE...
Vijay Nema Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
1 M.Cr.C.No.6610/2012 5.2.2013 Shri Y.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer, for the State. Applicant apprehends his arrest in Crime No.9/2012, registered by Police Station Gaisabad, District Damoh, for having committed offence under Sections 341,294, 506, 323 and 324 of I.P.C and Section 3/5 of Explosive Substance Act. While considering I.A.No.11665/2012, applicant has been granted Ad-interim anticipatory bail on 6.7.2012. There is no report with regard to misuse of the same by the applicant. Having perused case diary, there is no change in the circumstances and, therefore, the order passed on 6.7.2012 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant is affirmed. Considering the same, this application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest applicant Vijay Nema shall be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as contained in the order dated 6.7.2012. This order shall remain in force for a period of 60 ...
Anil Kumar Ojha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
1 M.Cr.C.No.11077/2012 5.2.2013 Shri Akhil Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer, for the State. Applicant apprehends his arrest in Crime No.67/2012, registered by Police Station Jawa, District Rewa, for having committed offence under Sections 420, 421, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 474 of I.P.C.While considering I.A.No.19154/2012, applicant has been granted Ad-interim anticipatory bail on 17.9.2012. There is no report with regard to misuse of the same by the applicant. Having perused case diary, there is no change in the circumstances and, therefore, the order passed on 17.9.2012 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant is affirmed. Considering the same, this application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest applicant Anil Kumar Ojha shall be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as contained in the order dated 17.9.2012. This order shall remain in force for a period of 60 days and in the meanwhile ...
- ‹ Prev
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- Next ›
- Last »