Madhya Pradesh Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gulzar Ahmad @ Gulzar Khan and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.444/2002 Appellants :1. Gulzar Ahmad @ Gulzar Khan, aged about 70 years, S/o Subhan Khan, Cultivator 2. Saleem Khan aged about 38 years, S/o Gulzar Khan 3. Hakeem Khan, aged about 35 years, S/o Gulzar Khan, cultivator, r/o Madiyaras, P.S. Karanpathar, District Shahdol.4. Ismail Khan, aged 20 years, S/o Munne Khan, Mechanic, R/o Budhar, P.S. Bidhar, District-Shahdol M.P. Vs. Respondent: State of M.P. Present: Hon. Shri Justice Ajit Singh Hon. Shri Justice B.D.Rathi --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For appellants : Shri V.K. Lakhera, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.S. Bisen, Government Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (3/10/2013) The following judgment of the court was delivered by: B.D. Rathi, J.This appeal has been preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for sho...
Uttam Beldar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
Criminal Appeal No.1858/2011 03.10.2013 Shri Shreyas Pandit, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Aditya Singh, P.L.for the respondent/State. Shri Rajroop Patel, Advocate for the complainant. Appellant has been produced from sub jail, Nagod, District Satna. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, heard finally. This appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment dated 11.08.2011 passed by FiRs.Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in S.T.No.296/2006, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 326 of I.P.C.and sentenced to R.I.for 5 years with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, he has to suffer further R.I.for three months. Facts, in short, are that on 14.09.2006, at about 11.15 A.M., complainant Vineet Gupta was going to Palika Bazar, Stana. Appellant Uttam Beldar and co-accused Sallu Yadav intercepted him, abused him and appellant Uttam Beldar took out a knife and assaulted him by the sam...
Dr.Narayan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.1489/2000 Appellant : Dr. Narain Singh aged about 35 years, s/o Shri Budh Singh, r/o Rao Colony, Shahdol, P.S. Shahdol, the Sohagpur District-Shahdol (M.P.) Vs. Respondent : The State of Madhya Pradesh Present: Hon. Shri Justice Ajit Singh & Hon. Shri Justice B.D.Rathi For appellant : Shri Mrigendra Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Aditya Adhikari, Standing Counsel with Shri Satish Chaturvedi, Advocate JUDGMENT ( .10.2013) The following judgment of the Court was delivered by: B.D.Rathi,J This appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code.) against the judgment dated 19.5.2000 passed by Special Judge (under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988(for short, the act.)) at Shahdol in Special Case No.3/97, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 13(1)(d) read with 13 (2) of the Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/...
Khushal Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR (M.P.) SINGLE BENCH Criminal Appeal No.1776/1999 Khushal Singh and others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Shri Siddharth Datt, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri Y.D. Yadav, learned PL for the State. Date of hearing :05. 09/2013 Date of Judgement :03. 10/2013 JUDGMENT Appellants have preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, being aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.6.1999 passed in S.T. No.12/1993 by Third Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara, whereby the appellants have been convicted under Section 498-A/34 of IPC and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 year with fine of Rs. 3,500/- (each), with default stipulations.2. Facts, in short, riving rise to this appeal are that appellant No.1 Khushal Singh, husband of deceased Padmabai, on 10.9.1998 has informed the police at Police Station Tamiya that for a while at about 4.15 pm he went upto the bus stand and when he returned back...
Sanjay Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.5135/2012 Sanjay Soni & others Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ Shri Mrigendra Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vivek Agrawal, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Prashant Singh, learned Counsel for respondents No.3, 4 and 5. ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (03.10.2013) By filing this writ petition initially the petitioners, four in number, working on the post of Sanitary Inspectors and officiating on the post of Chief Municipal Officer of various Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats, have approached this Court ventilating their grievances against circular dated 04.02.2012. It is contended that by such a circular, right of petitioners to be promoted on the post of Chief Munici...
Chanda Suryawanshi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
M.Cr.C.No.4892/2013 3/10/2013 Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Sameer Chille, GA for the respondent/State. Heard finally. This is the second application filed by applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail. The fiRs.application was dismissed as withdrawn 26/03/13. Applicants are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.931/12, registered at police station City Kotwali, District Chhindwara for the offence punishable under sections 294, 341, 506, 427, 384 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicants submit that applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that initially the allegation of extortion alleged against the applicant Chanda Suryawanshi and one co-accused Pawan. It is alleged against applicants Abhinandan and Rakhan that they came on the spot later on and assaulted the complainant. Applicants have no criminal past, they are ready to co-operate in further investigation. Under such circumstances, he...
Suresh and anr. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.444/2002 Appellants :1. Gulzar Ahmad @ Gulzar Khan, aged about 70 years, S/o Subhan Khan, Cultivator 2. Saleem Khan aged about 38 years, S/o Gulzar Khan 3. Hakeem Khan, aged about 35 years, S/o Gulzar Khan, cultivator, r/o Madiyaras, P.S. Karanpathar, District Shahdol.4. Ismail Khan, aged 20 years, S/o Munne Khan, Mechanic, R/o Budhar, P.S. Bidhar, District-Shahdol M.P. Vs. Respondent: State of M.P. Present: Hon. Shri Justice Ajit Singh Hon. Shri Justice B.D.Rathi --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For appellants : Shri V.K. Lakhera, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.S. Bisen, Government Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (3/10/2013) The following judgment of the court was delivered by: B.D. Rathi, J.This appeal has been preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for sho...
Smt. Manisha Lalwani Vs. Dr. D.V. Paul
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
Civil Revision No.344/2013 03.10.2013 Mr.Ashok Lalwani, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.S.K.Dwivedi, learned counsel for the non- applicant. During the couRs.of his submissions, learned counsel for the applicant has brought to the notice of this Court the order dated 18.01.2013 passed in M.C.C.No.1159/2011 by Division Bench of this Court, by which the Civil Judge Class-I, Sehora was directed to make endeavour to decide the civil suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the case. It was further observed by the Division Bench that in case of filing of any application of any nature, the court shall decide the application expeditiously not later than seven days from the date of filing of such application. If any application is found to be frivolous, then the court shall be free to impose heavy cost. Despite lapse of period of three months, the evidence in the suit is yet to be recorded. I have been apprised by learned counsel for the applicant that the Presidi...
M/S Vishnu Packaging Products Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.14762 of 2013 M/s Vishnu Packaging Products Versus. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors For Petitioner : Shri Pratyush Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondent/ : Shri Vivek Agrawal, Govt. Advocate. No.1/State ORDER (03.10.2013) Per U. C. Maheshwari J.1. On behalf of the petitioner-firm, this petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, (the same appears to be under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) being aggrieved by the orders dated 23.11.2012 (Annexure-P-1) passed by the appellate Authority respondent no.2 President, M.P. Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam Bhopal, (hereinafter in short Nigam) affirming the order dated 29.8.2011 (Annexure-P-2) bearing No.Aukevinibho/BF-(iii) 2008/5812 passed by the respondent no.3 Managing Director of Nigam whereby, the lease granted to the petitioner vide dated (10.1.2005) 12.1.2005 with respect of plot Nos.24/A & 24/B having area 45,000 sq. feet, situated at Ma...
Sayyed Minhajul Hasan Vs. Mst.Majhar Aara Begum
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR First Appeal No.36/2007 Sayyed Minhajul Hasan & 5 Others. Vs. Mst. Majhar Aara Begum. Counsel for the appellants : Mr. J.L. Mishra, Advocate. Counsel for the respondents :Mr. K.N. Fakruddin, Advocate. Present : Honble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe JUDGMENT (01.10.2013) In this appeal, the appellants/defendants have assailed the validity of the decree dated 23.11.2006 passed in Civil Suit No.1A/2006, by which the claim of respondents No.1 and 2 /plaintiffs has been decreed.2. Facts giving rise to filing of the appeal briefly stated are that the plaintiffs filed a suit on the ground that they are daughters of Sayyed Mahbubul Hasan, who was owner of the suit lands. It was further pleaded that the plaintiffs had two brothers one of whom is citizen of Pakistan whereas another namely Sayyed Manjurul Hasan died in the year 1978. The plaintiffs' father expired 2 F.A. No.36/2007 sometime in the year 1973. It was further pleaded that as per the M...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »