Madhya Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Samna Kol Vs. Pooran Lal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
1 S.A No.442/2006 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.442/2006 APPELLANTS : SAMNA KOL AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENTS : POORAN LAL AND OTHERS. Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. For the appellants : Shri S. K. Dwivedi and Shri S. N. Khan, Advocates. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (02/01/2013) The appellants have filed this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 10.1.2006 passed by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track) Amarpatan, District Satna in Civil Appeal No.121-A/05 whereby the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge Class-I, Maihar in Civil Suit No.74-A/1996 dated 28.6.2004 has been affirmed.2. The brief facts, leading to the filing of the present appeal, are that the appellant/defendant no.1, who is the owner of Khasra Nos.218, 217 and 221 of village Kalyanpur, sold the said lands to the respondents after obtaining due permission in that regard from the Collector, Sa...
Prabhat Ranjan Trivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
1 Writ Petition No.21917/2012(PIL) 02.01.2013 Shri J.N.Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. In this writ petition which has been filed as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondents to arrange road conveyance facilities (fly buses and taxis) with the coordination of Road Transport Authority / Road Transport Officers from the surrounding District places to Bandhavgarh to facilitate the tourists from abroad and within country to approach there and to implement the Tourism Scheme, 2012 of the State of Madhya Pradesh as provided under the Scheme. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears expedient in the interest of justice to permit the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents. The respondents are directed to consider the representation and take appropriate decision thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. With ...
Kamalsingh Narre Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
Writ Petition No.2608/2012 Kamalsingh Narre versus State of MP and others 02.01.2013. Shri Vishal Dhagat for the petitioner. Smt. Sheetal Dubey, Government Advocate, for the State/respondents. Petitioner claims to be a person, who is owner of certain land measuring 7.67 Acres comprising of KhaSr.Nos.135/7, 136/1, 135/5 and 135/6 situated in District Hoshangabad. It is the case of the petitioner that he alongwith one Shri Ashok Jamnani applied for development of colony in respect of the land in question. Permission has been granted under Rule 12 of the MP Colonizer Registration Nirbandhan Tatha Sharten Niyam, 1999 and under the MP Panchayat Rajya Adhiniyam. Thereafter, certain conditions have been imposed for development of the land, but by the impugned order-dated 3.6.2011 respondent No.3 has imposed an additional condition to the effect that petitioner should comply with the directions of section 165(6) of the MP Land Revenue Code and before selling the plots the petitioner should ob...
Chandra Bhusan Vs. South Eastern Coal Field Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.390/2011 (S) Chandra Bhusan Vs. South Eastern Coal Field Limited & another _______________________________________________________________ Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Greeshm Jain, learned Counsel for respondent No.1. Shri S. Chaturvedi, learned Counsel for respondent No.2. _______________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi _______________________________________________________________ ORDER (02/01/2013) The petitioner has approached this Court ventilating his grievance against the action of respondent No.1 of not recording the correct date of birth of the petitioner in his service roll and making the petitioner to retire on the basis of wrong date of birth recorded in the service record of the petitioner. It is contended that the original mark-sheet produced by the petitioner specifically contains the right date of birth of the petitione...
Baby John Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.6653/2011 Baby John Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & another ____________________________________________________________ Shri D.K. Dixit, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi ____________________________________________________________ ORDER (02/01/2013) The petitioner, who was serving as Assistant Superintendent in the Directorate of Sericulture, Bhopal, has approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, ventilating his grievance against the order dated 09.11.2011 by which the petitioner is granted the second higher pay scale in the time scale pay with effect from 09.11.2009 and has also called in question the order dated 15.03.2011 by which a show cause notice has been issued to him and on the basis...
Manvishram Charmakar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
1 W.P.No.21668/2012 W.P.No.21668/2012 02.1.2013 Shri Ajeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents. Heard. Petitioner by way of present petition seeks direction to the respondents to grant benefit of second kramonnati w.e.f 1999 as has been held in case of Smt Prerna Korane w/o Shri Pramod Koranne v. State of M.P.and otheRs.in W.P.No.6773/06, decided on 26.4.07. In view of nature of relief as has been sought for by the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the claim of the petitioner for benefit of second kramonnati in furtherance to order passed in Smt. Prerna (supra) and settle the claim within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. In case the petitioner is not found eligible, respondents are directed to pass a speaking order and communicate it to the petitioner. The petition is disposed of finally in above terms . No costs. Certified copy as per ...
Smt. Michu Kasde Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
W.A.No.1444/2012 02.01.2013 Shri Subodh Kathar, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Heard on the question of admission. This writ appeal under Section 2(1) of the M.P.Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, has been filed challenging the order dated 3.12.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.20101/2012, by which the learned Single Judge has refused to entertain the writ petition at the admission stage. It is contended that the learned Single Judge has failed to appreciate that one of the member of the Gram Panchayat was prevented to take part in the proceedings of the meeting held for consideration of no confidence motion moved against the appellant/petitioner, who was an elected Sarpanch. Only 20 elected members out of 21 were present and as 15 Panchas have voted against the appellant/petitioner, the motion of no confidence is said to be passed against the appellant. It is contended that these facts were ...
Radhelal Vs. Amna
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
S.A.No.1087/2011 (Radhelal Dangi versus Amna and otheRs.02.01.2013 Heard Shri Vinay Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant on the question of admission. The appellant has filed this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2011 passed by the 4rth Additional District Judge, Tikamgarh in Civil Appeal No.13-A/11 wherein and whereby the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2004 passed by the Civil Judge Class-1, Niwadi District Tikamgarh in civil suit No.56-A/95 has been affirmed and upheld. The appellant has filed the present appeal alleging that the impugned judgment and decree passed by the courts below deserves to be set aside on the following substantial questions of law:- (a) Whether the judgments and findings of the learned courts below are perveRs.and contrary, both on the facts and law and liable to be set aside by this Hon'ble Court ?. (b) Whether learned courts below committed error in appreciating the documents and material available on record in its proper p...
Dr.Shailendra Arya Vs. Smt. Laxmi Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
W.P.NO.22060/2012 02-01-2013 Shri K.K.Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the interlocutory order dated 17-08-2012 passed by the Civil Judge Class-II, Hoshangabad in Civil Suit No.07-A/12. The petitioners who are plaintiffs have filed suit for eviction against defendant Smt. Laxmi Bai. In the said civil suit the plaintiffs have filed application seeking direction to defendant to pay rent or to strike off the defence. It is the case of the defendant that she is owner of the property. The property belongs to her husband and after the death of her father she is owner of the property and she is not tenant and is not liable to pay any rent. As the matter pertains to determining the question of relation ship of land lord and tenant between the parties which requires inquiry, the learned trial court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under section 13(6) of the Accommodation Control Act, 1861, in doing so and i...
Satish Chandra Awasthi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
Writ Petition No.21293/2012 2.1.2013 Shri Parag S. Chaturvedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, Government Advocate, for the State. According to the petitioner, during the period between 29.5.2011 and 30.6.2011 pursuant to the direction of respondents, he supplied water in seven villages namely Kundam, Tikaria, Kuwarhat, Chherpani, Dadratola, Ghodatakan and Samnapur, all in Tahsil Kundam, District Jabalpur, as per Collector rate i.e.Rs.740/- within the distance of five kilometers and beyond it Rs.50/- per kilometer fixed vide order dated 3.6.2011. His grievance is that instead of Collector rate, respondent no.4 made the payment to him only at the rate of Rs.450/-. The petitioner submits that he has even made a representation dated 22.11.2012, Annexure P5, to respondent no.3, Collector, Jabalpur, for making payment of difference amount which comes to Rs.1,08,620/- but it has fallen on deaf eaRs.It is in this background the petitioner has filed the present petition for a direc...
- ‹ Prev
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 91
- 92
- 93
- Next ›
- Last »