Madhya Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jai Prakash Lodhi and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.561/2001 Komal Prasad Dhimolay VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.589/2001 Jai Prakash Lodhi & others VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri H.S.Dubey,counsel for the appellants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 3rd day of January, 2013) Since both the appeals are related with the common judgment dated 30.3.2001 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur in S.T.No.5/2000, therefore, both the appeals are hereby decided by this common judgment.2. The appellants have preferred this appeal against the aforesaid judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur, whereby -:- 2 -:- ...
Komal Prasad Dhimoley Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.561/2001 Komal Prasad Dhimolay VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.589/2001 Jai Prakash Lodhi & others VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri H.S.Dubey,counsel for the appellants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 3rd day of January, 2013) Since both the appeals are related with the common judgment dated 30.3.2001 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur in S.T.No.5/2000, therefore, both the appeals are hereby decided by this common judgment.2. The appellants have preferred this appeal against the aforesaid judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur, whereby -:- 2 -:- ...
Smt. Laxmi Bai Salate Vs. Smt. Lata Pandeya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
Writ Petition No :17625. 2012 Smt. Laxmi Bai Salate & others versus Smt. Lata Pandeya & otheRs.03.01.2013. Shri Atul Choudhari for the petitioneRs.Challenging an interlocutory order dated 20.9.2012, passed by 1st Additional District Judge, Sagar in Civil Suit No.16-A/2011, rejecting the prayer made by the petitioners in an application filed under section 138 of the Evidence Act, for recalling certain witnesses for cross-examination, this writ petition has been filed. Respondent No.1 Smt. Lata Pandeya has filed the suit in question for partition of the property, the parties are related to each other and it is the case of the petitioners that their father Late Anandlal Salate was the sole owner of the property, he has constructed the property on his own, it is not ancestral property and, therefore, the plaintiffs have no right to the suit property. On the contrary, the plaintiffs claimed the suit property to be ancestral property and staked their claim to 1/6th share of the property. Be ...
Swadeshi Lal JaIn Vs. Ayodhya Prasad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
C.R. No.21/2003 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava C.R. No.21/2003 APPLICANT/ : S.L. Jain s/o Babu Lal Jain, DEFENDANT R/o village Mandi Bamora, Tahsil-Beena, District Sagar (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENT : Ayodhya Prasad s/o Ram Bharose, PLAINTIFF R/o Gandhi Ward, Beena, Tahsil-Beena, District Sagar (M.P.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri G.S. Baghel with Shri Brijendra Swaroop Sahu, Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondent though served. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER { 03-01-2013 } This revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the defendant assailing the judgment and decree dated 14.9.2001 passed by Additional District Judge, Khurai, District Sagar in Civil Appeal No.9-B/1999 whereby the judgment and decree dated 27.9.1999 passed by learned Civil Judge, Class-I, Be...
Rambabu Sharma Vs. Smt. Nirmala Sharma
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
FiRs.Appeal No.1012/2012 3.1.2013 Shri Pradeep Naveriya, Advocate, for the appellant. Heard on admission. This appeal by the paternal grandfather is directed against the order dated 4.10.2012 whereby the Second Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhopal, has dismissed his MJ.No.105/2010 filed under sections 7 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (in short, the Act.).The appellant is father of Raghvendra Sharma whereas respondent no.1 is mother of Sandhya Sharma. Both Raghvendra and Sandhya were married on 14.2.2000 at Bhopal and Khushi is their minot daughter. Raghvendra and Sandhya have died on 17.6.2009 at Indore. Khushi is presently nine years old and is living with respondent no.1 (maternal grandmother) at Bhopal. The appellant (paternal grandfather) filed the above mentioned MJ.No.105/2010 for being appointed as guardian of Khushi. He pleaded that since he has four daughteRs.Khushi can also be well looked after. He also averred that respondent no.1 lives separately fr...
Kamla Prasasd Choudhary Vs. Tulsi Das
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
Second Appeal No.1045/2010 (K.P.Choudhary versus Tulsidas & ors.) 03.01.2013 Heard Shri Mukhtar Ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant on the question of admission and interim relief. The appellant has filed this appeal being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 06.09.2010, passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Katni in C.A.No.50-0A/08, whereby the judgment and decree of the Fourth Civil Judge Class I, Katni dated 24.10.08 passed in C.S.No.14- A/06 has been set aside and reversed. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellant purchased a part of KhaSr.No.124, village Barhi, Tahsil Katni, District Jabalpur (not district Katni) by registered sale deed dated 16.03.1982 from father of respondent No.1, however, by mistake or oversight, KhaSr.Nos.130/1, 131 were mentioned in the sale deed. It is stated that respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 also purchased a part of the aforesaid khaSr.numbers from the father of respondent No.1 and similar mistakes w...
Nandu @ Nand Kumar Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.12/1997 Manot Kumar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.2338/1996 Nandu @ Nand Kumar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri A. Usmani, counsel for the appellants. Shri R.P. Tiwari, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on 3rd day of January, 2013) Both the appeals are related with the common judgment dated 19.12.1996 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in S.T. No.642/93, therefore, decided by a common judgment.2. The appellants Nandu @ Nand Kumar and Manot have preferred these appeals against the aforesaid judgment, whereby the appellant Nandu ...
Morsingh Vs. Smt.Chamabai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
(1) Civil Revision No.85/2007 HIGH COURT OF M.P.JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K.Shrivastava Civil Revision No.85 / 2007 Applicant Morsingh S/o. Amarsingh Rajput, R/o. Gram Baghwad Pas, Bichapur, P.S.and Tehsil Timarni, District Harda (M.P.) versus Respondent : Smt. Chamabai, W/o. Bhanwarsingh Rajput, R/o. Doodhkach, Tehsil Timarni, District Harda (M.P.) _________________________________________________________ Shri U.K.Shukla, Advocate for applicant. Shri Jagtendra Prasad, Advocate for respondent. _________________________________________________________ ORDER (03/01/2013) Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 16.01.2007 passed by learned Second Additional District Judge, Harda in M.J.C.No.3/2004 whereby the application of the wife-respondent under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been allowed to the tune of `500 per month, this revision has been filed by the husband-applicant.2. Several contentions have been raised by Shri Shukla learned cou...
Rajju Prasad Sahu Vs. Shri Manish Shrivastava
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
CONC NO.498/2012 03-01-2013 Shri D.K.Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned counsel for the State. Shri P.K.Mishra, learned counsel for the Corporation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even though petitioner has been reinstated, salary and other monetary benefits accruing to him in accordance with the judgment of this court has not been paid. As the petitioner was compulsory retired it is possible that certain amounts have been paid to him while settling his post retiral dues. That being so, respondents are not required to settle the monetary benefits after taking note of the amount already paid to the petitioner. As the aforesaid exercise may take some time, respondents are granted six months time for complying with the direction for payment of monetary benefits to the petitioner. Accordingly, for the present finding no case for proceeding further in the matter, contempt application is disposed of an respondents are discharged from ...
Uttam Singh Thakurs Vs. Nagar Palika Parishad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
(1) Civil Revision No.395/2009 HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava Civil Revision No.395 / 2009 Applicant Uttam Singh Thakur, S/o. Late Omkar Singh, Occupation Contractor, R/o. Ganj, District Betul (M.P.) Vs. Respondent : Nagar Palika Parishad, Betul Through Chief Municipal Officer Betul, District Betul (M.P.) _________________________________________________________ Shri Sanjay Sanyal, Advocate for applicant. _________________________________________________________ ORDER (03/01/2013) This revision application has been filed against the order dated 25.08.2009 passed by learned Court below in an unregistered case whereby the suit of the plaintiff-applicant in respect to the payment of interest has been dismissed holding that same is not maintainable.2. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that a decree for realization of `7,22,514 has been granted in favour of plaintiff-applicant by learned Civil Judge Class-...
- ‹ Prev
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- Next ›
- Last »