Madhya Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagpal Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
Cr.A.No.209 o04. 01.2013 None for the appellant. Shri Punit Shroti, learned PL for the respondent-State. In the absence of appellant's counsel and his counsel the adjudication of this appeal on merits is not possible, hence the case is adjourned with a direction to list the same by fixing a date in the month of March 2013. The presence of the appellant before this court for such date be secured by issuing a bailable warrant of Rs.5,000/- (Rs.Five thousand).Such warrant be issued positively within five days from today and the same be sent through Superintendent of Police, Panna with a direction to execute the same under his guidance and supervision, so that the same be not returned back unserved. The case be listed accordingly. (U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks...
Kuldeep Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
1 Cr.R. No.1762 of 2012 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON'BLE SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1762/2012 Kuldeep Shrivastava. -Vs- State of M.P. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Ranjan Banerjee, Advocate for the applicant. Shri S.K.Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 4th day of January, 2013) This criminal revision has been preferred by the applicant against the order dated 6.6.2012 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge to the Court of 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Panna in ST No.74/2012, whereby the charge of offence punishable under Section 304/34 of IPC was framed.2. The prosecution case, in short relating to the present revision is that on 15.4.2012 the complainant Sandeep had lodged an intimation to the police at Police Station Dharampur District Panna that a black colou...
Dhan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
1 W.P.No.21484/2012 04.1.2013 Shri Anoop Sonkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. In respect of claim put forth by the petitioner in this petition it is noticed that the petitioner has already preferred Writ Petition No.601/2011 which is pending for consideration. The said writ petition is directed against certain recovery which is effected against the petitioner. Whereon on 21.1.2011 the recovery order has been stayed. During pendency of the said petition, the petitioner has retired. His retrial dues are not settled on the anvil the stay as has been granted in Writ Petition No.601/2011. Since the Writ Petition No.601/2011 is already pending, the petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate application seeking release of gratuity amount instead of filing a fresh petition. With said liberty, the present petition is disposed of finally. C.c as per rules. (SANJAY YADAV) Das JUDGE...
Gulli @ Gopal Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
Cr.A.No.1063 o04. 01.2013 None for the appellant. Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, learned PL for the respondent- State. In the absence of appellant's counsel and his counsel the adjudication of this appeal on merits is not possible, hence the case is adjourned with a direction to list the same by fixing a date in the month of March 2013. The presence of the appellant before this court for such date be secured by issuing a bailable warrant of Rs.5,000/- (Rs.Five thousand).Such warrant be issued positively within five days from today and the same be sent through Superintendent of Police, Panna with a direction to execute the same under his guidance and supervision, so that the same be not returned back unserved. The case be listed accordingly. (U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks...
Murtaza Ali Vs. the Board of Secondary Education
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
Writ Petition No.5971/2009 4.1.2013 Shri Ishteyaq Husain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate, for the respondent. The petitioner appeared in 2009 High School Examination in English Medium as a private candidate. But on 3.5.2009 the result of petitioner through internet was incorrectly shown as a candidate of Hindi Medium. And because of this mistake he was wrongly shown absent in General English subject with incorrect marks in Hindi Special subject. Aggrieved, the petitioner made a representation on 20.6.2009 to the respondent. He then filed the present petition. The respondent during the pendency of petition rectified the mistake and declared the correct result of petitioner in the month of July 2009 itself. Admittedly, the petitioner has not suffered any loss academically due to the mistake. Since the grievance of petitioner has already been redressed, no direction is needed in the present petition. The petition stands finally disposed of. Certified cop...
M/S Rithwik Kranti (Jv) Th: T.Ravi Krishna Vs. the State of Madhya Pra ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
R.P.No.540/2012 4.1.2013 Shri Ajay Mishra, Sr.Advocate with Shri Gaurav Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S. Dwivedi, learned Government Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri Brain Da. Silva, Senior Advocate with Shri V. Bhide, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Shri R.N.Singh, Senior Advocate with Shri A.J.Pawar, learned counsel for Respondent No.3. Shri Singh, learned Senior Advocate on instructions from Principal Secretary, Mr.Rajneesh Vaish, states that the tender in question has been cancelled and a decision to issue a fresh NIT has been taken. In this view of the matter the present petition is disposed of as infructuous. It is understood that he entire process will be initiated and decided afresh. (S.A.Bobde) (Alok Aradhe) Chief Justice Judge AK...
Guru Swami Shikha Samiti Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
C.R. 57/2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR CIVIL REVISION No.57 of 2012 SINGLE BENCH: JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA Applicant : Guru Swami Shiksha Samiti Law College Campus, Sagar Road, Chhattarpur (M.P.) Through its Secretary Narendra Khare, S/o Late Shri Nathuram Khare, R/o Shantinagar Colony, Chhattarpur, District Chhattarpur, M.P. Versus Respondents :1. State of M.P. through Collector, Chhattarpur, District Chhattarpur, M.P.2. Land Acquisition Officer/Sub Divisional Officer, Chhattarpur, District Chhattarpur, M.P. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant by - Shri Anoop Saxena, Advocate Respondents 1 and 2 by-Shri Rahul Jain, Govt. Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (04/01/2013) Against the order dated 15.11.2011 passed by respondent no.2, this revision application has been filed by the claimant under Section 18(3) of the Land A...
The Accountant General Vs. Shri N.P.Pandey
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
WRIT APPEAL No.1298/20104. 01.2013 Shri P. Shankaran, learned Counsel for the appellant. Shri A. Mukhopadhyay, learned Counsel for respondent No.1/petitioner. Shri V.S.Shroti, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Vikram Johri, learned Counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Learned senior Counsel for the High Court states that entire amount due to the respondent No.1/petitioner has been paid. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.1/ petitioner, however, seeks time to ascertain the amount. We, therefore, direct the respondent No.1/ petitioner to approach the Registrar General, who shall explain the payments made to the respondent No.1/ petitioner in settlement of the dues. The respondent No.1/petitioner is directed to appear before the Registrar General on 16th January, 2013. The appellant shall also appear before the Registrar General on that date. Put up this matter on 22nd January, 2013. (S.A.Bobde) (K.K.Trivedi) Chief Justice Judge Skc...
Bhushan Singh Rajput Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
R.P.NO.983/12 04-01-2013 Shri Pratyush Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. Seeking a review of an order passed on 21-08-2012 in W.P.No.12798/12, this application is filed. The petitioner is working as Assistant Grade-III and was transferred from District Raisen to Sidhi. Challenge to the order was made on the grounds of personal inconveniences of the petitioner. This court taking note of the aforesaid was not inclined to interfere into the matter but disposed of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his representation. not it is stated that inspite of the fact the petitioner was working he has been relieved and by contending that the petitioner has been relived illegally, review is sought for for staying the order of transfer. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner , once it is found that this court on the grounds on which the order of transfer was challenged are not such on the b...
Santosh @ Lallu Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
Cr.A.No.46 o04. 01.2013 Shri Sanjeev Sexena, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Punit Shroti, learned PL for the respondent-State. After taking me though the record of the trial court alongwith the impugned judgment, initially the case was argued on merits by the appellant's counsel at length. In such arguments he raised a question that as per record the deceased had committed suicide under some sentimental emotions, which came in existence because of some allegations made against her by the appellant. In continuation he said that in any case in such count the conviction of the appellant could not be upheld, on which some query was made and in response of the same, instead to argue further appellant's counsel seeks short adjournment to examine legal position and bring the earlier decided case in which it was held that merely on the emotions or sentiments no inference could be drawn against the appellant that he has abated the deceased for committing the alleged suicide. Considerin...
- ‹ Prev
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- Next ›
- Last »