Madhya Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prembai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
W.A.No.369/2011 08.01.2013 Shri Ajay Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents. On 3.10.2012, the respondents which includes the Secretary, Additional Commissioner Bhopal, Collector District Raisen and Project Officer Integrated Child Development Project Bareilly, were directed to file affidavit not below the rank of the Additional Secretary. We find that stipulated period is over and two months time have passed, but no affidavit is filed. Accordingly, on payment of Process Fee within a week by registered post, issue notice to the Secretary, Woman and Child Development Department to show cause why action for contempt be not initiated. Notice be made returnable within four weeks. (S.A.Bobde) (K.K.Trivedi) Chief Justice Judge. A.Praj....
Dr. Bhartesh JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
Review Petition No.12/2013 08.01.2013 Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Vivek Agrawal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4. Shri Vijay Kumar Shukla, Advocate for respondent No.5 Satish Datt Garg. This review petition is filed for review of order dated 21.12.2012 in W.A.No.1455/2012 by which petitioner is seeking correction of the typographical error. By a detailed order in M.C.C.No.9/2013 we have already directed for correction of the typographical error. In view of aforesaid, no separate order is required in this review petition. This review petition is disposed of in view of order passed today in M.C.C.No.9/2013. The aforesaid order shall be applicable in the present case mutatis mutandis. No order as to costs. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) Judge Judge psm...
Rajesh Kela Vs. Chandrapal Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
1 M.Criminal C. No.654/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR (SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE SHRI M.A. SIDDIQUI, J.MiscCriminal Case No.654/2012 Rajesh Kela & another APPLICANTS VERSUS Chandrapal Singh & another RESPONDENTS Shri Anil Khare ,Sr. Adv with Shri Jasbeer Singh , Advocate for applicants. Shri Sanjeev Tuli, Advocate, for respondent no.1. Smt. Pratibha Mishra P.L.. for respondent No.2/State. . Order Reserved on 20.12.2012 Order Passed on 8 .01.2013 ORDER This Misc. criminal Case u/s 482 Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (hereinafter referred to for short 'Cr.P.C.') has been filed in order to quash the proceedings pending before the Court of J.M.F.C. Satna in Criminal Case No.2995/2005 which has been registered dated 11.09.2006 by which cognizance has been taken against petitioners and others for the alleged offence punishable u/s 147, 148. 302 read with section 149,, 120-B,201 and 342 of the IPC.2. undisputedly to co-accused persons namely Ravendra Siungh and Mahendra Singh quashe...
Santosh Kumar Sweeper Vs. Smt. Sharda Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
Criminal Revision No.761/2012 08.01.2013 Shri Sajidulla Khan, Advocate for the applicant. Shri M. Choubey, Advocate for the respondents. Heard on admission. This Criminal Revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C.has been filed by the applicant against the order dated 9.3.2012 passed in MJ.No.145/2011 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Sagar whereby the application under Section 127 of Cr.P.C.filed by the respondents was accepted and their maintenance was enhanced upto Rs.4500/- per month. It appears that it was an application under Section 127 of Cr.P.C.for enhancement of the maintenance amount. The applicant is earning a sum of Rs.11,000/- per month, whereas the respondents are wife and four daughters of the applicant, and therefore the dependency of the applicant may be presumed to be one-third of his salary and the remaining amount may be given to his wife and children by way of maintenance. The learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sagar has only awarded a sum of Rs.4500/- per ...
Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
1 W.P.No.21584/2012 08.1.2013 Shri L.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents. Heard. Petitioner by way of present petition seeks direction to the respondents to grant benefit of second kramonnati w.e.f 1999 as has been held in case of Smt Prerna Korane w/o Shri Pramod Koranne v. State of M.P.and otheRs.in W.P.No.6773/06, decided on 26.4.07. In view of nature of relief as has been sought for by the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the claim of the petitioner for benefit of second kramonnati in furtherance to order passed in Smt. Prerna (supra) and settle the claim within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. In case the petitioner is not found eligible, respondents are directed to pass a speaking order and communicate it to the petitioner. The petition is disposed of finally in above terms . No costs. Certified copy as per rules. (SANJAY YADAV)...
Mukesh Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
WP 3496.06 Writ Petition No.3496 of 2006 (Mukesh Singh and six others v. The State of M.P.and two otheRs.08-01-2013 Shri Hemant Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 & 2/State. Smt. Sudha Gautam, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. Heard. PetitioneRs.Assistant Accountants/Programmer, in Madhya Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., vide this petition seek quashment of order dated 12-08-2005 and order dated 20-09-1983 to the extent it sanctioned the pay scale of Rs.925-1500 and direction to the respondents to grant the pay scale of Rs.1000-30-1210-40-1250-EB-40-1450-50-1800 in Choudhary Pay Commission, approved by the Board of respondent/Corporation as contained in Agenda Item No.28 passed in its 59th Meeting on 18-08-1983, with all consequential benefits of appropriate pay fixation in subsequent pay revisions, along with arrears and interest thereon. Relevant facts in nutshell are that in furthe...
M/S Gemini Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADAHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR W.P.No.15484/2007 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and others. W.P.No.15421/2007 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and others. W.P.No.2802/2008 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Asstt.Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2810/2008 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2811/08 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt.Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2823/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2824/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt.Commissioner and others. 2 W.P.No.2825/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2826/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2827/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2828/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2829/08 M/s Vandana...
M/S Vindyachal Air Products Private Limited Vs. the Madhya Pradesh Mic ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
W.P.No.9174/2012 & W.P.No.9022/2012 08/01/2013 W.P.No.9174/2012 Shri Vivek Rusia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel for Respondent No.1. W.P.No.9022/2012 Shri Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Rusia, learned counsel for the respondent. As common questions are involved in both these writ petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience, documents and pleadings available in W.P.No.9174/2012 are being referred to in this order. Petitioner herein M/s R.S.Avtar Singh & Company feels aggrieved by the order passed by the M.P.Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, which has passed certain orders under statutory provisions and the rules framed thereunder. It is seen that the respondent/ Vindyachal Air Products PVT.LTD.filed a claim purported to be under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2006 and...
M/S Gemini Fules Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADAHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR W.P.No.15484/2007 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and others. W.P.No.15421/2007 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and others. W.P.No.2802/2008 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Asstt.Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2810/2008 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2811/08 M/s Shri Sharda Domestic Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt.Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2823/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2824/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt.Commissioner and others. 2 W.P.No.2825/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2826/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2827/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2828/08 M/s Vandana Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner and others. W.P.No.2829/08 M/s Vandana...
Vilas Kumar Bhugaonkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR W.P. No.10502/11(s) Vilas Kumar Bhugaonkar .. .. Petitioner Vs./- State of M.P. and others .. .. Respondents ------------ For the Petitioner : Shri Ajay Mishra, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Pratyush Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Prashant Singh, No.1 and 2 learned Additional Advocate General =============== Present: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE ---------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (08.1.2013) In this petition, the petitioner has inter-alia challenged the validity of the order dated 3.8.2010 by which services of the petitioner have been terminated in the light of the recommendation made by High Power Scrutiny Committee that the petitioner has illegally obtained the caste certificate. The petitioner has also challenged the validity of the order dated 2.9.2011 passed by the appellate authority by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed. The petitioner also seeks a direction to...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »