Madhya Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Agrawal Vs. Branch Manager, Allahabad Bank Branch Chirai D ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
1 M.Cr.C No.15459/2012 23/1/2013 Shri Madan Singh, counsel for the petitioner/ complainant. This petition has been preferred against the order 20.9.12 passed by FiRs.Additional Sessions Judge, Mandla in Criminal Revision No.29/12, rejecting the revision on the ground of limitation. Petitioner / complainant has preferred a private complainant under Sections 167, 420, 471 of IPC in the Court of JMFC, Mandla which was dismissed at the stage of Section 203 Cr.P.C, observing that to be groundless for further proceedings. Against the impugned order, revision was preferred with a delay of eight months, the cause of delay was said to be illness of the petitioner. It is submitted that by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in support of illness, in the Court of revision medical certificate issued by the Doctor Neeraj Bansal was produced on 4.7.12, but revisional Court has observed that in support of illness, no medical certificate has been produced. In view of the aforesaid factual cont...
Smt. Savita Choudhary Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
WP 21819.12 Writ Petition No.21819 of 2012 (Smt. Savita Choudhary v State of M.P.and another) 23-01-2013 Shri Jagdish Sakalle, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. Appointed on compassionate ground on ad-hoc basis as Lower Division Clerk by order dated 10-05-1994 in lieu of death of her husband, services of the petitioner were regularized by order dated 29-12-2008 in Class III Ministerial Service under M.P.Class III (Ministerial Service) Rules as Assistant Grade III on grade of Rs.3050-75-3950-80-9590. The regularization was in pursuance to the recommendation by the Selection Committee constituted in furtherance to General Administration Department's Memo. not F-5-3/06/1-3 dated 16-05-2007 and F-5-3/06/1/3 dated 08-02-2008 for considering the case of daily wages/ad-hoc appointees and Temporary Government Servants for regularization. Vide this petition petitioner seeks direction for grant of seniority in Assistant Grade III from initial date of appointment. The direction is sought...
Devesh Pratap Singh Vs. Board of Revenue
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
Devesh Pratap Singh versus Board of Revenue, M.P.Gwalior Writ Petition No.721 23. 1.2013: Shri Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel petitioner. Challenging order Annexure P-1 dated 4.11.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue rejecting an application for restoration of a revision which was dismissed by the Board of Revenue, this writ petition has been filed. Having gone through the records and on considering the objections raised by Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the State it is seen that petitioner's father Later Shri Awdhesh Pratap Singh during his life time on 17.2.1976 filed an appeal under Section 4(3) of the M.P.Ceiling on Agricultural Land Holding Act before the Board of Revenue M.P., Gwalior. In the said appeal challenge was made to an order dated 29.12.1975 passed by the S.D.O.the appeal came up for hearing before the Board of Revenue after a long period of time on 25.5.1983 and vide order Annexure P-3 due to want of prosecution the appeal was dismissed. In the ...
Rajesh Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
1 M.Cr.C.No.9086/2011 M.Cr.C No.9086/2011 23.01.2013 Petitioner by Shri K.S.Baghel, Advocate. Respondent no.1/State by Shri Vinot Fauzdar, Panel Lawyer. Respondent no.2 by Shri Y.P.Sharma, Advocate. This petition has been preferred under section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C) against the order dated 18/07/2011 passed by 6 th Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa, District-Rewa in Criminal Revision No.97/2011 affirming order dated 01/02/2011 of Magistrate taking cognizence of offence under section 193 IPC against the petitioner. According to complaint, in the year 2009-10, petitioner and respondent no.2 contested election for President of Nagar Panchayat, Govindgarh. The respondent no.2 lost the election. On 26/11/2009 petitioner submitted notarized affidavit in support of his candidature containing some false information and hiding some true information. In fact petitioner has been convicted under section 188 IPC and sentenced with fine of Rs.200/- earlier, but this f...
Mishrilal Kesherawani Vs. the General Manager, West Central Railway Ja ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
Writ Petition No :1103. / 2013 Mishrilal Kesharwani versus General Manager, WCR and others 23.01.2013. Shri R.P.Singh for the petitioner. Shri Govind Patel for respondents 1 to 5, on advance notice. Challenging a show-cause notice dated 21.12.2012 Annexure P/1 issued to the petitioner, he has filed this writ petition. It is the contention of the petitioner that he is not an encroacher or an illegal occupant of the area in question, he is a lawful occupant of the area in question and has a right to the property, therefore, he cannot be evicted. Shri Govind Patel, learned counsel for the respondents on advance notice, raised a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of this writ petition. It is stated by Shri Patel that for the present only a show-cause notice has been issued and after receiving petitioners reply to the same if petitioner is found to be encroacher or an illegal occupant, proceedings for evicting him in accordance to law shall be initiated. Accordingly, ...
Karan Singh Vs. Mahila Beni Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
M.Cr.C.No.4702 o23. 01.2013 Shri Pradeep Naveriya and Smt. Varsha Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant. None for the respondent, although represented through duly engaged counsel. Heard on the question of admission. ORDER The applicant husband has filed this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.being aggrieved by the order dated 20.3.2012 passed by the Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in Criminal Revision No.04/12, affirming the order dated 30.5.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class- Tikamgarh in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.131/08, whereby allowing the application of the respondent herein filed under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C., the sum of the monthly maintenance awarded in some proceeding under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.has been enhanced from Rs.600/- to Rs.2,000/-. It is noted that earlier order of maintenance was passed long before, thereafter vide order dated 31.5.2004 the initial amount of maintenance Rs.150/- per month was enhanced upto Rs.600/- per month and the same w...
Arjun Baretha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
1 M.Cr.C No.15228/2012 23/1/2013 Shri Dinesh Upadhyaya, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Vinot Fouzdar, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent / State. This petition has been preferred under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for setting aside the order dated 11.9.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in Criminal Appeal No.500/2011, declining the compromise petition of the parties, for incident occurred on 27.7.2010 between the petitioners and injured person Yasvant vide Annexure A/5 JMFC, Tikamgarh convicted the petitioners under Section 327 of IPC sentenced them six months RI with fine of Rs.1000/- each. Aforesaid judgment is challenged in the appeal by the petitioneRs.In Courts below petitioners and the injured person submitted written compromise petition, duly singed by the parties, but it was declined on the ground that allege offnece is not compoundable, even with the permission of the Court. Under inherent power, this Court is supposed 2 M.Cr.C No.15228/2012 to pas...
Smt. Poornima @ Purneshwari Choudhary Vs. Ishwari Patle
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: HON. SHRI N.K.GUPTA,J.CRIMINAL REVISION NO.2014/2010 Smt. Poornima @ Purneshwari Choudhary. Vs. Ishwari Patle & another. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Umesh Trivedi, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Ramakant Patel, Advocate for the respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 23rd day of January, 2013) The applicant has challenged the order dated 7.9.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge to the Court of First Additional Sessions Judge Balaghat in Criminal Revision No.170/2009 whereby the application filed under Section 216 of Cr.P.C. by the respondents was accepted and the order dated 5.11.2009 passed by the JMFC, Balaghat in Criminal Case No.2577/2006 in favour of the applicant under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. was set aside.2. The brief facts relating to the present revision are that...
Jeevan Lal Vs. Smt. Basanti Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
1 M.Cr.C No.14373/12 23/1/2013 Shri Manish Jain, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sameer Chile, learned counsel for respondent / State. This petition has been preferred challenging the order grant of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C to respondent -wife and daughter. In view of the fact that in trial Court the State was not made a party, hence, default of non-supply copy of petition to State is worth ignoring, the default is ignored. Let notice of this petition be issued to respondent No.1, on behalf of respondent No.2 also. Steps within three working days. Let matter be listed in the week commencing from 4/3/2013 for consideration of stay application. (Tarun Kumar Kaushal) JUDGE dcs/-...
Yogesh Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
Yogesh Kumar versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.21809 23. 1.2013: Shri Paritosh Trivedi, learned counsel along with the applicant in person. The Corpus is produced by the S.D.O.Police Balaghat along with lady staff members of the Police Station. The corpus was given enough time by this Court to think over the matter and make a statement. The case was taken over in the fiRs.round and thereafter again in the second round and in the second round the corpus made a statement that she wants to go with her father, therefore, in the light of the aforesaid statement no further indulgence into the matter is called for. The corpus was permitted to go with her parents. With the aforesaid finding no further orders necessary, the application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »