Madhya Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shanker Mihani Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
W.P.No.1375/2008 (Shanker Mihani versus State of MP and otheRs.07.08.2012 Shri Rajneesh Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Sharma, learned P.L.for the State. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondents/authorities, the police to maintain the crime register in accordance with the regulation Nos.820, 644 and 822 of the Police Regulation. The return has been filed by the respondents/State in which they have stated that they are maintaining the register and have made up-to-date entries in the same till the date of filing of the return copy of which has been filed as Annexure R/1 showing that they have updated the entry relating to the record of the petitioner maintained in the crime register also. In view of the return filed by the respondents, nothing remains further for adjudication in the present petition. The writ petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of in view of the statements made in the return. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Manoj Vishvakarma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
7.8.2012 Shri Sameer Beohar, Advocate for applicant. Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.127/2012 registered at P.S.Cantt. District Sagar for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 324, 294, 323/34, 506-B of the IPC Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. The applicant was not having any sharp edged weapon at the time of incident. It is alleged that the applicant assaulted the complainant by stick, due to which he sustained fracture, thus, at the most the case of the applicant would fall under section 325 of the IPC. No case is made out under section 307 of the IPC against the applicant. The applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest his reputation will be tarnished, therefore, he be released on anticipatory ...
Babunder Saket Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
M.Cr.C.No.7827/2012 7.8.2012 Shri Y.P.Sharma, counsel for the applicants. Shri A.K.Singh, GA for the respondent/State. Heard. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicants have been arrested in connection with Crime No.185/12 registered at P.S.Waidhan, Singrouli for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 332, 307, 382, 323 of IPC and Section 25, 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are in custody since 13.6.12. They have been falsely implicated in this case. The main allegation in regard to use the firearm is against the co-accused Munna. Co-accused Monu Soni @ Manot Soni has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.6.2012 passed in M.Cr.C.No.6073/2012. Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to applicant. Learned counsel for the ...
In Reference Vs. Vinod
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
(1) Cr.Ref.No.1/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR (AFR) Division Bench: Hon'ble Justice Shri Rakesh Saksena Hon'ble Justice Shri T.K.Kaushal CRIMINAL REFERENCE NO.1/2012 In reference Received from: Presiding Officer,Children's Court & Sessions Judge, East-Nimar Khandwa (M.P.) -Versus- Vinot S/o Kishanlal Gawli, aged 22 years R/o Khalwa, Khandwa. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.D.Jain, Senior Advocate/Advocate General for the State. Shri S.C.Datt, Senior Advocate with Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate as Amicus Curiae. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing:26. 07/2012 Date of Order :07. 08/2012 ********** ORDER Per: Rakesh Saksena,J.Sessions Judge, East-Nimar, Khandwa acting under section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the 'Code') has made this reference under the following circumstances:- Judi...
Mukeem @ Imran Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1554/2007 Mukeem alias Imran Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate. For the respondent/State: Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer. ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 7th day of August, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 21.6.2007 passed by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act, Sehore in Special Case No.81 of 2006 whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 8/21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter it will be mentioned as NDPS Act.) and sentenced for five years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-, i...
Smt. Manisha Abindra Vs. Vinod Abindra
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
1 F.A.No.1107/2011 Smt.Manisha Abindra Vinot Abindra 7.8.2012 Shri Pranay Choubey, Counsel for appellant. Shri Y.H.Khare and Shri M.K.Raghuvanshi, Counsel for respondent. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Family Court, Bhopal in R.C.S.No.41-A/2011 dated 27.6.2011 by which a decree of divorce based on consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act was granted. The allegations in this appeal are in respect of playing fraud on the appellant for the compromise. The appellant has also filed certain documents showing the fact that some fraud was practised on the appellant and because of this, a decree was obtained and the compromise was not lawful. The Apex Court in Banwari Lal versus Smt.Chando Devi AIR 199.SC 113.considering this aspect held thus:- A party challenging a compromise can file a petition under proviso to R.3 of O.23, or an appeal under S.96(1) of the Code, in which he can not question the validity of the compromise in view of R.IA of O...
Rinku @ Rakesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
M.Cr.C.No.7775/2012 7.8.2012 Shri Ashish Sinha, counsel for the applicant. Shri A.K.Singh, GA for the respondent/State. Heard finally. The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.126/12 registered at P.S.Ichhawar for the offence punishable under Sections 14 & 15 of M.P.Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 8.5.2012. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that it is true that applicant was found on the city of Sehore because his sister-in-law (Bhabhi) was died. It is also true that he could not inform the police therefore police registered a case against him and taken into custody. Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to applicant. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the par...
Chagan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
7.8.2012 Shri Manish Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, PL for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 26.7.2012 in connection with Forest Crime No.4002/14 registered at P.S.Piplod for the offence punishable under sections 26(1-Chha) of Indian Forest Act and under section 9, 39 (a).50 (a)(s).51(I).1A of the Wild Life Protection Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He is agriculturist. Normally the wild animals (wild pig) enter into the fields of agriculturist, therefore, the agriculturists keep the dogs to attack them. The charge sheet has been filed. The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counse...
Muneem @ Mungwa Kol Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
1 Criminal Appeal No.221/2006 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.221/2006 Muneem @ Gungwa Kol Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present :Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri R.N. Yadav, counsel for the appellant. Shri S.K. Kashyap, Public Prosecutor the respondent/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on 7th day of September, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 8.11.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa in S.T. No.97/05, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376(2) (f) of IPC and sentenced for ten years' R.I. with fine of `100/-. In default of payment, he was to undergo for six months' R.I. in addition.2. The prose...
Yuv Raj Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
7.8.2012 Shri Ankur Shrivastava, Advocate for applicant. Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.59/2012 registered at P.S.Cantt. District Jabalpur for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A of the IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. This case arose out of a private complaint filed by complainant Shalini Singh. The Magistrate, who took the cognizance of the case, directed the Police under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C.to register the case against the applicant. As per the private complaint, allegation of demand of a sum of Rs.20 lacs has been made against the applicant and his parents. The parents of the applicant have already been enlarged on anticipatory bail. Counsel has further submitted tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- Next ›
- Last »