Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govind Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
Criminal Appeal No.1168/2012 13.7.2012 Shri R.S.Saini, counsel for the appellant. Shri R.P.Tiwari, Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent. Heard on I.A.No.11424/2012, an application under section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 3 days in filing the appeal. Looking to the grounds mentioned in the application, application is allowed. Delay of 3 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. On the request of learned counsel for the appellant, matter is heard finally, with consent of learned counsel for the parties. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, order dated 19.3.2012 passed by Sessions Judge, Damoh in M.J.C.No.138/2011 is hereby modified that the appellant shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- from his bond, in place of entire amount of the bond. The appellant is directed to deposit the same amount before the trial Court within one month from today. If amount is not deposited then, trial Court may proceed further for recovery of that amount accord...
Union of India Vs. Ajay Kumar Yadav
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 W.P. No. 8772/2012 (S) 13.7.2012 Shri S. A. Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.K. Nagpal, learned counsel for respondents. Heard. Order dated 18.4.2012 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur is being assailed vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India; whereby claim by respondents for House Rent Allowance from the day they vacated the factory accommodation has been allowed. The respondents are High Skilled employees in Ordnance Factory, Khamaria. While living in Government accommodation allotted to them, they got their individual houses constructed and they shifted in these houses after vacating the government accommodation on 5.12.2005, 8.6.2006, May/2003, 28.1.2005 and 21.5.2006 respectively. Applications were filed by respective respondents for grant of House Rent Allowance but were ...
M/S Deepa Advertising Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
W.P.No.4171 / 2012 (M/S.Deepa Advertising..Vs.Union of India & otheRs.13-07-2012 Shri B.S.Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Govind Patel, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents and agreed to by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to filing of the present petition the respondent/authorities by order dated 30-3-2012 have provided an electricity connection to the petitioner and have also stated that the decision regarding extension of the contract commencement date in view of the delayed electricity connection will be taken later by the competent authority. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the aforesaid letter of the respondents dated 30-3-2012 the petition filed by the petitioner be disposed of with a direction to the respondent/authorities to take an early decision in respect of extension of the date of ...
Bindu Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 Criminal Rev No.604/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR (SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE SHRI M.A. SIDDIQUI, J.Criminal Rev No.604/2012 Bindu Patel APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh RESPONDENT Shri Ramesh Kumar , Advocate for applicant. Shri Akshya Namdeo P.L.. for respondent/State. Order Reserved on 10.07.2012 Order Passed on 13.07.2012 ORDER This criminal revision u/s 397(2)/401/482 Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (hereinafter referred to for short 'Cr.P.C.') has been filed in order to quash the order dated 6.3.2012 passed by 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Sessions Trial No.201/2010 (State of M.P. v. Abid and 10 others) by which learned trial Court has framed the charge u/s 306 of IPC against the applicant.2. undisputed fact of the case is that Mahendra Kumar Patel (since deceased) was husband of petitioner/applicant. Due to dispute between them so Mahendra Kumar Patel committed suicide on 27.1.2009 by consuming some poisonous substance, while getting disturbe...
General Manager Narmada Hydro Electric Development Corporation Vs. Har ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 F.A.No.611/2012 General Manager (R&R) Hari Prasad & others 13.7.2012 Shri A.J.Pawar, Counsel for appellant. Shri Shashank Upadhyaya, Counsel for respondent No.1 & 2. Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy.AG for respondents No.3, 4 & 5. I.A.No.7063/12 under Section 149 of CPC for extension of time for payment of deficit court-fee. Alongwith the application, the appellant has paid deficit court-fee. Considering aforesaid, prayer made in the application is allowed. Time period for payment of deficit court-fee is extended till 22.6.2012, the date on which deficit court-fee was paid. Admit. Issue notice to the respondents. Notice on behalf of respondent No.1 & 2 is accepted by Shri Upadhyaya and on behalf of respondents No.3,4, & 4 by Shri Pandey, Dy.AG. I.A.No.6789/12 for stay After hearing both parties, till further ordeRs.following directions are issued:- (i) Appellant to deposit 50% of the awarded amount within a period of one month before the reference Court. (ii) Appellant shall also furnish securi...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Shrinivas Sharma
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1....W.A.No.715 o13. 7.2012 Parties present. It is submitted by Shri P.K.Kaurav, learned Dy. A.G.for the State that against the order passed by the Full Bench dated 17.2.2012 on Reference, four SLPs have been preferred before the Apex Court. A prayer is made on bahelf of the appellant and also on behalf of the State for grant of four weeks time to apprise this Court in respect of out come of the SLPs. The prayer is opposed by Shri P.N.Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 but considering the fact that the Supreme Court has re-opened on 2.7.2012 after summer vacation, we find it appropriate to allow further two weeks time to the appellant and for the State to apprise this Court in respect of out come of the SLPs. List for hearing in the 1st week of August,2012. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt. Vimla Jain) Judge Judge vj...
General Manager Narmada Hydro Electric Development Corporation Vs. Dag ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 F.A.No.610/2012 General Manager (R&R) Dagadiya & others 13.7.2012 Shri A.J.Pawar, Counsel for appellant. Shri Shashank Upadhyaya, Counsel for respondent No.1. Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy.AG for respondents No.2 & 3. I.A.No.7085/12 under Section 149 of CPC for extension of time for payment of deficit court-fee. Alongwith the application, the appellant has paid deficit court-fee. Considering aforesaid, prayer made in the application is allowed. Time period for payment of deficit court-fee is extended till 22.6.2012, the date on which deficit court-fee was paid. Admit. Issue notice to the respondents. Notice on behalf of respondent No.1 is accepted by Shri Upadhyaya and on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3 by Shri Pandey, Dy.AG. I.A.No.6786/12 for stay After hearing both parties, till further ordeRs.following directions are issued:- (i) Appellant to deposit 50% of the awarded amount within a period of one month before the reference Court. (ii) Appellant shall also furnish security for the remain...
Chhabbilal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
W.P.No.8105 / 2012 (Chhabbilal ..Vs.State of M.P.& otheRs.13-07-2012 Heard Shri Vijay Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities by not taking action against the driver of the vehicle concerned which caused the death of his son in a road accident while his son on 24-4-2012 along with his friend was going from Chhalpara to Lakhnadaun. It is, however, prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition be disposed of directing the respondent/Supdt. of Police, to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the persons named by him in the complaint. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4, Superintendent of Police, Seoni, to look into the complaint filed by the petitioner and deal with the same expeditiously in accordance with law. To enabl...
General Manager Narmada Hydro Electric Development Corporation Vs. Kal ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 F.A.No.608/2012 General Manager (R&R) Kalabai (dead) through LR. Manot Kumar & others 13.7.2012 Shri A.J.Pawar, Counsel for appellant. Shri Shashank Upadhyaya, Counsel for respondent No.1. Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy.AG for respondents No.2, 3 & 4. I.A.No.7061/12 under Section 149 of CPC for extension of time for payment of deficit court-fee. Alongwith the application, the appellant has paid deficit court-fee. Considering aforesaid, prayer made in the application is allowed. Time period for payment of deficit court-fee is extended till 22.6.2012, the date on which deficit court-fee was paid. Admit. Issue notice to the respondents. Notice on behalf of respondent No.1 is accepted by Shri Upadhyaya and on behalf of respondents No.2,3 & 4 by Shri Pandey, Dy.AG. I.A.No.6785/12 for stay After hearing both parties, till further ordeRs.following directions are issued:- (i) Appellant to deposit 50% of the awarded amount within a period of one month before the reference Court. (ii) Appellant shall a...
Savitri Patel Vs. Bank of Baroda
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.20346/2011) Savitri Patel Vs. Bank of Baroda and others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Petitioner in person Counsel for respondent Bank Shri Praveen Chaturvedi, Advocate Counsel for Auction Purchaser Shri Sanjay Sanyal, Advocate O R D E R (13/07/2012) The following order of the Court was delivered by Sanjay Yadav, J : Letter dated 24.11.2011 addressed to the Hon'ble Chief Justice was directed to be treated as petition in view of the provision of Chapter XIIIA Rule 12 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008.2. The petitioner, Smt. Savitri Patel, guarantor in cash credit facility of her late husband in the letter had stated: **fuosnu gS fd eSus ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds }kjk fjV fiVh'ku ua- 7789@2010 esa ikfjr vkns'k ds vuqlkj iwjh jde 12].03].000@& vadu ckjg yk[k rhu gtkj :i;s cSad vkWQ cM+ksnk esa vius edku yksu [kkrs esa fnukad 29-06-2010 dks tek...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »