Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
(1) Cr.A.No.550/2001 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE T.K.KAUSHAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.550/2001 APPELLANT : Ramesh S/o Ganjan Gond, aged 24 years, R/o village Pisajhodi, Tahsil and District Betul (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENT: State of Madhya Pradesh through Police Station Betul, Tahsil and District Betul (M.P.). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellant : Smt. Durgesh Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Shri Amit Pandey, Panel Lawyer. Date of hearing :19. 07/2012 Date of judgment:19. 07/2012 (JUDGMENT ) Per: Rakesh Saksena; J.Appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 20.3.2001 passed by Sessions Judge, Betul in Sessions Trial No.100/2000, convicting the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for three years, on each count ...
Yatri Soni Vs. Shri R.A. Khandelwal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
M.C.C.No.618/2012 19/07/2012 Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned counsel for the applicant. This application has been filed under Chapter 2 Rule 10 of the M.P.High Court Rules and the grievance made in the application is that the order passed on 4.10.2010 in W.P.No.14010/2010 has not been complied with. Prayer made that the respondents be directed to comply with the order passed by the Writ Court. On a perusal of the provisions of Chapter 2 of the M.P.High Court Rules 2008, it is seen that under Chapter 10, various provisions are made for registration of Miscellaneous Civil Cases and the class of cases, which can be registered as M.C.C are indicated in Sub-Clause 1 to 8, this provision only indicates the applications filed as indicated are to be registered as a Miscellaneous Civil Cases. Under this Rule, no power is vested on this Court to interfere into the matter or issuing any further direction, petitioner should take recouRs.to the remedy available for getting the order executed in accorda...
Dr. Narmada Prasad Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
1....W.A.No.640 of 2012 Dr. Narmada Pd. Sharma State of M.P.& otheRs.19.7.2012 Shri Rohit Arya, learned Senior Advocate with Shri Sanjeev Tuli, Counsel for the appellant. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy.G.A.For respondents No.1,3 & 4. Shri Anshuman Singh, Counsel for respondent No.2. This appeal is directed against an order dated 19.4.2012 passed in W.P.No.16060 of 2010 by which a writ petition preferred by the petitioner seeking regularisation on the post of Lecturer under the respondent No.2, in the institution namely Pt. Loknath Shashtri Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Jabalpur. The Learned Single Judge found that the appellant was appointed as Siksha Karmi for the School though he was teaching B.A.and M.A.classes and was not entitled to be regularised on the post of Lecturer and dismissed the petition. However, the learned Single Judge in the last para of the judgment observed that in case in future if the respondents take recouRs.to selection of Lecturer for Mahavidhyalaya under Rules of 1990, the...
Kumari Rooplal Agrawal Vs. Rani Durgawati Vishwavidyalaya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
1 W.P. No. 4216/2012 19.7.2012 Shri D.K. Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Kaurav, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. None for respondent No. 2. Shri Manish Upadhyay, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. With consent the matter is heard finally. Petitioner is aggrieved by nongrant of two marks in theory paper of oral medicine, diagnosis and Radiology, which the petitioner appeared in the supplementary examination. Relevant facts giving rise to the case are that the petitioner was admitted in the Course of Bachelor of Dental Surgery in the Hitkarini Dental College in the year 200607. After passing first year she appeared in second year examination wherein she was declared fail in one subject as she obtained 45 marks out of 100 (passing marks being 50%). On her request for grant of 5 grace marks having been turned down by the examining body, i.e., respondent No. 1, petitioner approached this Court vide W.P. No. 5411/...
Roop Ram Sen Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.17283/2010 Roop Ram Sen. Vs State of M.P.and otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri Pushpraj Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Shri Vikram Johri, learned counsel for the respondent No.6. ORDER (19.7.2012) 1: This petition is directed against the order dated 12.11.2011 passed by the respondent No.2, by which the appeal preferred by the respondent No.6 has been allowed and the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer in appeal of the petitioner has been set aside, on the grounds that a proper enquiry was conducted by the Sub Divisional Officer with respect to the residence of the respondent No.6 and a definite finding was recorded that the respondent No.6 was not the local resident of the Village and, therefore, was not to be given appointment on the post of Panchayat Karmi, for the purposes of his Notification as Secretary of th...
Smt.Kanchan Vishwakarma Vs. Madhya Pradesh Rojgar Garanti Parishad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
W.P.No.5972/2010 19/07/2012 Shri Ashok Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned GA for Respondent No.1. Petitioner was a contract employee and during the subsistence of the contract, as it was found that the petitioner was not regular in attendance, his services have been terminated on the ground of no longer required. Inter-alia contending that the contract is brought to an end on the allegation of petitioner being absent, the same could not be done without conducting any enquiry and without giving any opportunity of hearing and contending that the cancellation of the contract of the petitioner, in the manner without granting any opportunity of hearing, is illegal, this writ petition is filed. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 submits that as the petitioner was only a contract employee and as the contract has been terminated during the subsistence of the same, the order is not stigmatic in nature and does not warrant any opport...
Santosh Kumar Chaturvedi Vs. Smt.Premwati @ Munni Devi Chaturvedi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
F.A.No.66/2005 Santosh Kumar Chaturvedi Smt.Premwati @ Munni Devi Chaturvedi 19.7.2012 Appellant present in person. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.10.2004 passed by the Second Additional Judge to the Court of FiRs.Additional District Judge, Sidhi in Hindu Marriage Case No.7-A/2004, by which a suit filed by the appellant seeking decree of divorce against respondent was dismissed. The appellant is appearing in person. He has insisted for hearing of this case today itself. He has also made certain allegations that his papers have been stolen and he could not produce any documentary evidence before the trial Court. However, we have perused the pleadings, in which we find that there are allegations against the respondent that she was having illicit relations with 20 persons, whose names are pleaded in para 10 of the petition. On the aforesaid ground, appellant had also alleged that at the time of marriage she was pregnant, however this fact was denied by th...
Smt. Prem Bai Vs. Smt. Mamta Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
1 W.A.No.776/2012 Smt.Prem Bai Smt.Mamta Bai & others 19.7.2012 Shri Arpan Shrivastava, Counsel for appellant. This appeal is directed against an order dated 18.5.2012 in Writ Petition No.8000/2012 by which the writ petition preferred by the appellant against the order dated 9.3.2012 was dismissed with the observations that if the appellant feels that the application has been rejected on improper consideration or on mis-appreciation of facts, she may file an application for review and it would be for the competent Tribunal to consider the application. Facts of the case are that the appellant is a returned candidate for the office of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Chhaprikala, Tahsil and District Sehore. Appellant's election was assailed by Smt.Mamta Bai on various grounds by filing an election petition under Section 122 of the M.P.Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993. The appellant herein contested the election petition. The Election Tribunal after recording evidence of the electi...
Vibha Sharma Vs. Principal Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
W.P.No.6026/2011 (Vibha Sharma versus State of MP and otheRs.19.07.2012 Shri V.K.Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.P.Tiwari, learned P.L.for the State. Shr Devang Trivedi, learned counsel for the respondent No.5. Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 23.03.2011 by which the charge of the post of the Secretary of the Gram Panchayat Imjhhara has been given to the respondent No.5/Chitrangat Rajpoot taking it away from the petitioner as a result of which she is not required to perform her duties as Secretary only of the Gram Panchayat Nouradehi. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially working as Panchayat Secretary, Imjhhara. Subsequently, by order dated 31.01.2011 she was given additional charge of the post of Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Nouradehi and thereafter by impugned order dated 23.03.2011 the charge of the post of Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Imjhhara has been given to the respondent No...
Santosh Kumar Kewat Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
1 Cr.A No.1134/2002 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE T.K. KAUSHAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1134 OF 200.APPELLANT: Santosh Kumar Kewat, S/o Shambhu Kewat, aged 25 years, Agriculturist, R/o Village Barna, P.S & Tahsil Jaisingh Nagar, District-Shahdol (M.P) Versus RESPONDENT: State of Madhya Pradesh ****************************************************************** For appellant : Ms. Aparna Singh, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Umesh Pandey, Government Advocate ****************************************************************** Date of hearing :19. 07/2012 Date of judgment:19. 07 /2012 This appeal has been preferred under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C) against the judgment dated 09/03/2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Beohari, District- Shahdol in Sessions Trial No.254/2001 convicting the appellant under section 302 IPC for committing murder of Khoob Chand sentencing...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »